Literature DB >> 21170758

Usefulness of 3-month protocol biopsy of kidney allograft to detect subclinical rejection under triple immunosuppression with basiliximab: a single center experience.

Kohsuke Masutani1, Hidehisa Kitada, Akihiro Tsuchimoto, Shunsuke Yamada, Hideko Noguchi, Kazuhiko Tsuruya, Masao Tanaka, Mitsuo Iida.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Theoretically, an early protocol biopsy (PB) serves to detect subclinical rejection (SCR), allowing early treatment and prevention of acute rejection (AR) and chronic graft injuries. In this retrospective study, we investigated the incidence of biopsy-proven AR (BPAR) and the usefulness of a 3-month PB in detecting SCR in kidney transplant (KT) and simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant (SPKT) recipients who received triple immunosuppression and basiliximab.
METHODS: Between January 2007 and September 2009, 116 patients received transplantation (KT = 112, SPKT = 4). In August 2008, we changed our PB policy and started to collect PB after 3 months instead of a pre-discharge biopsy performed 1 month after transplantation. Here we compare the incidence of SCR (defined as Banff grade Ia or higher) between the pre-discharge PB group and the 3-month PB group. PB was obtained from 41 patients before discharge (pre-discharge PB group), and from 49 patients 3 months after transplantation (3-month PB group).
RESULTS: Among all recipients, 21 patients were diagnosed with BPAR (estimated incidence of BPAR 20.1%); including 13 (62.0%) diagnosed from 31 to 180 postoperative days (POD), and only 3 (14.3%) within 30 POD. The incidence of BPAR was not different between the two groups (19.5 and 20.8%, respectively); however, 4 of 8 recipients in the 3-month PB group were diagnosed with SCR, compared to none in the pre-discharge PB group (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Since the use of triple immunosuppression and basiliximab delayed the onset of AR, we recommend that in order to detect SCR, PB should be obtained 3 months postoperatively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21170758     DOI: 10.1007/s10157-010-0385-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol        ISSN: 1342-1751            Impact factor:   2.801


  11 in total

Review 1.  The significance of subclinical rejection and the value of protocol biopsies.

Authors:  B J Nankivell; J R Chapman
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 8.086

2.  Significance of subclinical rejection in early renal allograft biopsies for chronic allograft dysfunction.

Authors:  Moriatsu Miyagi; Yukio Ishikawa; Sonoo Mizuiri; Atsushi Aikawa; Takehiro Ohara; Akira Hasegawa
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.863

3.  Sirolimus-based calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal immunosuppressive regimen in kidney transplantation: a single center experience.

Authors:  Sameer M Alarrayed; Amgad E El-Agroudy; Ahmad S Alarrayed; Sumaya M Al Ghareeb; Taysir S Garadah; Salah Y El-Sharqawi; Ali H Al-Aradi; Balaji G Dandi; Sadiq Abdulla
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 2.801

4.  Subclinical rejection and borderline changes in early protocol biopsy specimens after renal transplantation.

Authors:  Ian S D Roberts; Srikanth Reddy; Christine Russell; David R Davies; Peter J Friend; Ashok I Handa; Peter J Morris
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Beneficial effects of treatment of early subclinical rejection: a randomized study.

Authors:  D Rush; P Nickerson; J Gough; R McKenna; P Grimm; M Cheang; K Trpkov; K Solez; J Jeffery
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 6.  Recent findings in ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation: classification and therapeutic strategy for acute antibody-mediated rejection due to ABO-blood-group-related antigens during the critical period preceding the establishment of accommodation.

Authors:  Kota Takahashi
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 2.801

7.  Prevalence and immunohistochemical findings of subclinical kidney allograft rejection and its association with graft outcome.

Authors:  Francisco V Veronese; Irene L Noronha; Roberto C Manfro; Maria I Edelweiss; Julio Goldberg; Luiz F Gonçalves
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.863

8.  Lack of benefit of early protocol biopsies in renal transplant patients receiving TAC and MMF: a randomized study.

Authors:  D Rush; D Arlen; A Boucher; S Busque; S M Cockfield; C Girardin; G Knoll; J-G Lachance; D Landsberg; J Shapiro; A Shoker; S Yilmaz
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 8.086

9.  Triple immunosuppression with or without basiliximab in pediatric renal transplantation: acute rejection rates at one year.

Authors:  A Duzova; N Buyan; M Bakkaloglu; A Dalgic; O Soylemezoglu; N Besbas; A Bakkaloglu
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.066

10.  Basiliximab induction therapy for live donor kidney transplantation: a long-term follow-up of prospective randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Hussein A Sheashaa; Mohamed A Bakr; Amani M Ismail; Khaled M Mahmoud; Mohamed A Sobh; Mohamed A Ghoneim
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2008-03-11       Impact factor: 2.801

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.