Literature DB >> 16796717

The significance of subclinical rejection and the value of protocol biopsies.

B J Nankivell1, J R Chapman.   

Abstract

Subclinical rejection (SCR) is diagnosed by protocol histology with a maximal prevalence occurring early after transplantation, falling to low levels by 1 year. Needle-core biopsy is safe, and the histology obtained fairly reflects subclinical immune activity. Several studies have consistently shown that SCR is associated with chronic tubulointerstitial damage, subsequent renal dysfunction and reduced graft survival. SCR is effectively treated by pulse corticosteroid therapy, although increased baseline immunosuppression may be necessary. A single randomized clinical trial of biopsy and corticosteroid therapy demonstrated significantly improved early structural and functional outcomes, and a (nonsignificant) 17% risk reduction in 4-year graft survival. Three possible approaches include: no protocol biopsies (usually accompanied by powerful immunosuppression); biopsies only in high-risk recipients (who may be difficult to reliably predict) or universal screening protocol biopsy (comprehensive but limited by cost and resource utilization). The appropriate screening methodology for a transplant unit is both a clinical and an economic decision; influenced by the SCR prevalence and potential gains of treatment, against costs and resource utilization. Further trials to quantify the cost-benefit balance in a typical, heterogeneous recipient population using modern immunosuppression are required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16796717     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01436.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  37 in total

Review 1.  Detecting adaptive immunity: applications in transplantation monitoring.

Authors:  Georg A Böhmig; Markus Wahrmann; Marcus D Säemann
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 4.074

2.  Transplantation: Biomarkers in transplantation—the devil is in the detail.

Authors:  Michael Abecassis; Bruce Kaplan
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 28.314

3.  Transplantation: Utilizing the transcriptome to predict allograft fibrosis.

Authors:  Adyr Moss; Bruce Kaplan
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 4.  Benefits and risks of protocol biopsies in pediatric renal transplantation.

Authors:  Roberto Gordillo; Raj Munshi; Eric J Monroe; Giridhar M Shivaram; Jodi M Smith
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 3.714

5.  Fibrosis with inflammation at one year predicts transplant functional decline.

Authors:  Walter D Park; Matthew D Griffin; Lynn D Cornell; Fernando G Cosio; Mark D Stegall
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 10.121

6.  Usefulness of 3-month protocol biopsy of kidney allograft to detect subclinical rejection under triple immunosuppression with basiliximab: a single center experience.

Authors:  Kohsuke Masutani; Hidehisa Kitada; Akihiro Tsuchimoto; Shunsuke Yamada; Hideko Noguchi; Kazuhiko Tsuruya; Masao Tanaka; Mitsuo Iida
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 2.801

7.  Interleukin-2 in CD8+ T cells correlates with Banff score during organ rejection in liver transplant recipients.

Authors:  Bora Akoglu; Susanne Kriener; Swantje Martens; Eva Herrmann; Wolf Peter Hofmann; Vladan Milovic; Stefan Zeuzem; Dominik Faust
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 3.984

8.  Orthogonal Comparison of Molecular Signatures of Kidney Transplants With Subclinical and Clinical Acute Rejection: Equivalent Performance Is Agnostic to Both Technology and Platform.

Authors:  S M Kurian; E Velazquez; R Thompson; T Whisenant; S Rose; N Riley; F Harrison; T Gelbart; J J Friedewald; J Charette; S Brietigam; J Peysakhovich; M R First; M M Abecassis; D R Salomon
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 9.  Proteomics and metabolomics in renal transplantation-quo vadis?

Authors:  Rahul Bohra; Jacek Klepacki; Jelena Klawitter; Jost Klawitter; Joshua M Thurman; Uwe Christians
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.782

10.  Gene Expression in Biopsies of Acute Rejection and Interstitial Fibrosis/Tubular Atrophy Reveals Highly Shared Mechanisms That Correlate With Worse Long-Term Outcomes.

Authors:  B D Modena; S M Kurian; L W Gaber; J Waalen; A I Su; T Gelbart; T S Mondala; S R Head; S Papp; R Heilman; J J Friedewald; S M Flechner; C L Marsh; R S Sung; H Shidban; L Chan; M M Abecassis; D R Salomon
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 8.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.