PURPOSE: In a pilot study of women with pathologic nipple discharge (PND) undergoing ductoscopy, we tested quantitative assessment of gene promoter hypermethylation using quantitative multiplex methylation-specific PCR (QM-MSP) to enhance detection of duct carcinoma in situ (DCIS). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Women with PND underwent ductoscopy; ducts with significant lesions were surgically resected (36 ducts in 33 women) and those with minimal findings were not (28 ducts in 16 women). QM-MSP was done on ductoscopy cell samples. Results were compared with cytology and tissue histology. RESULTS: Cells from ducts with significant lesions on ductoscopy had significantly higher levels of methylation than those with minimal findings. Furthermore, cells from ducts with DCIS displayed higher levels of methylation than those with benign lesions such as papilloma (P = 0.006); or ducts with minimal findings on ductoscopy (P = 0.0001). Cumulative RASSF1A, TWIST1, and HIN1 gene methylation accurately distinguished ducts with cancerous versus benign lesions (100% sensitivity, 72% specificity, and area under the curve of 0.91 according to receiving operating characteristic analyses). QM-MSP analysis was more informative than cytology (100% versus 29% sensitivity, respectively), for detecting DCIS. In a validation set of paraffin-embedded DCIS and papilloma samples from women presenting with PND, QM-MSP was significantly higher in DNA from DCIS than papilloma sections (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The positive predictive value of ductoscopy was more than doubled (19% versus 47%) with the addition of QM-MSP, demonstrating the benefit of targeting ducts having both high methylation and significant abnormalities on ductoscopy for surgical excision. Future large-scale studies to validate this approach are needed.
PURPOSE: In a pilot study of women with pathologic nipple discharge (PND) undergoing ductoscopy, we tested quantitative assessment of gene promoter hypermethylation using quantitative multiplex methylation-specific PCR (QM-MSP) to enhance detection of duct carcinoma in situ (DCIS). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:Women with PND underwent ductoscopy; ducts with significant lesions were surgically resected (36 ducts in 33 women) and those with minimal findings were not (28 ducts in 16 women). QM-MSP was done on ductoscopy cell samples. Results were compared with cytology and tissue histology. RESULTS: Cells from ducts with significant lesions on ductoscopy had significantly higher levels of methylation than those with minimal findings. Furthermore, cells from ducts with DCIS displayed higher levels of methylation than those with benign lesions such as papilloma (P = 0.006); or ducts with minimal findings on ductoscopy (P = 0.0001). Cumulative RASSF1A, TWIST1, and HIN1 gene methylation accurately distinguished ducts with cancerous versus benign lesions (100% sensitivity, 72% specificity, and area under the curve of 0.91 according to receiving operating characteristic analyses). QM-MSP analysis was more informative than cytology (100% versus 29% sensitivity, respectively), for detecting DCIS. In a validation set of paraffin-embedded DCIS and papilloma samples from women presenting with PND, QM-MSP was significantly higher in DNA from DCIS than papilloma sections (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The positive predictive value of ductoscopy was more than doubled (19% versus 47%) with the addition of QM-MSP, demonstrating the benefit of targeting ducts having both high methylation and significant abnormalities on ductoscopy for surgical excision. Future large-scale studies to validate this approach are needed.
Authors: Roisin M Connolly; Mary Jo Fackler; Zhe Zhang; Xian C Zhou; Matthew P Goetz; Judy C Boughey; Bridget Walsh; John T Carpenter; Anna Maria Storniolo; Stanley P Watkins; Edward W Gabrielson; Vered Stearns; Saraswati Sukumar Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2017-09-16 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Kala Visvanathan; MaryJo S Fackler; Zhe Zhang; Zoila A Lopez-Bujanda; Stacie C Jeter; Lori J Sokoll; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; Leslie M Cope; Christopher B Umbricht; David M Euhus; Andres Forero; Anna M Storniolo; Rita Nanda; Nancy U Lin; Lisa A Carey; James N Ingle; Saraswati Sukumar; Antonio C Wolff Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-11-21 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Mary Jo Fackler; Christopher B Umbricht; Danielle Williams; Pedram Argani; Leigh-Ann Cruz; Vanessa F Merino; Wei Wen Teo; Zhe Zhang; Peng Huang; Kala Visvananthan; Jeffrey Marks; Stephen Ethier; Joe W Gray; Antonio C Wolff; Leslie M Cope; Saraswati Sukumar Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2011-08-08 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Amy E Cyr; Julie A Margenthaler; Jill Conway; Antonella L Rastelli; Rosa M Davila; Feng Gao; Jill R Dietz Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2011-08-17 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Vered Stearns; Mary Jo Fackler; Seema A Khan; Saraswati Sukumar; Sidra Hafeez; Zoila Lopez Bujanda; Robert T Chatterton; Lisa K Jacobs; Nagi F Khouri; David Ivancic; Kara Kenney; Christina Shehata; Stacie C Jeter; Judith A Wolfman; Carola M Zalles; Peng Huang Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2016-06-03
Authors: Mary Jo Fackler; Zoila Lopez Bujanda; Christopher Umbricht; Wei Wen Teo; Soonweng Cho; Zhe Zhang; Kala Visvanathan; Stacie Jeter; Pedram Argani; Chenguang Wang; Jaclyn P Lyman; Marina de Brot; James N Ingle; Judy Boughey; Kandace McGuire; Tari A King; Lisa A Carey; Leslie Cope; Antonio C Wolff; Saraswati Sukumar Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2014-04-15 Impact factor: 12.701