PURPOSE: Mice are commonly used in glaucoma research, but relatively little is known about aqueous outflow dynamics in the species. To facilitate future use of the mouse as a model of aqueous humor outflow, several fundamental physiological parameters were measured in the mouse eye. METHODS: Eyes from adult mice of either sex (C57BL/6 background) were enucleated, cannulated with a 33-gauge needle, and perfused at constant pressure while inflow was continuously measured. RESULTS: At 8 mm Hg, total outflow facility (C(total)) was 0.022 ± 0.005 μL/min/mm Hg (all values mean ± SD; n = 21). The flow-pressure relationship was linear up to 35 mm Hg. The conventional outflow facility (C(conv)) was 0.0066 ± 0.0009 μL/min/mm Hg, and the unconventional outflow (F(u)) was 0.114 ± 0.019 μL/min, both measured at room temperature. At 8 mm Hg, 66% of the outflow was via the unconventional pathway. In a more than 2-hour-long perfusion at 8 mm Hg, the rate of facility change was 2.4% ± 5.4% (n = 11) of starting facility per hour. The ocular compliance (0.086 ± 0.017 μL/mm Hg; n = 5) was comparable to the compliance of the perfusion system (0.100 ± 0.004 μL/mm Hg). CONCLUSIONS: Mouse eyes are similar to human eyes, in that they have no detectable washout rate and a linear pressure-flow relationship over a broad range of intraocular pressures. Because of the absence of washout and the apparent presence of a true Schlemm's canal, the mouse is a useful model for studying the physiology of the inner wall of Schlemm's canal and the conventional outflow tissues.
PURPOSE:Mice are commonly used in glaucoma research, but relatively little is known about aqueous outflow dynamics in the species. To facilitate future use of the mouse as a model of aqueous humor outflow, several fundamental physiological parameters were measured in the mouse eye. METHODS: Eyes from adult mice of either sex (C57BL/6 background) were enucleated, cannulated with a 33-gauge needle, and perfused at constant pressure while inflow was continuously measured. RESULTS: At 8 mm Hg, total outflow facility (C(total)) was 0.022 ± 0.005 μL/min/mm Hg (all values mean ± SD; n = 21). The flow-pressure relationship was linear up to 35 mm Hg. The conventional outflow facility (C(conv)) was 0.0066 ± 0.0009 μL/min/mm Hg, and the unconventional outflow (F(u)) was 0.114 ± 0.019 μL/min, both measured at room temperature. At 8 mm Hg, 66% of the outflow was via the unconventional pathway. In a more than 2-hour-long perfusion at 8 mm Hg, the rate of facility change was 2.4% ± 5.4% (n = 11) of starting facility per hour. The ocular compliance (0.086 ± 0.017 μL/mm Hg; n = 5) was comparable to the compliance of the perfusion system (0.100 ± 0.004 μL/mm Hg). CONCLUSIONS:Mouse eyes are similar to human eyes, in that they have no detectable washout rate and a linear pressure-flow relationship over a broad range of intraocular pressures. Because of the absence of washout and the apparent presence of a true Schlemm's canal, the mouse is a useful model for studying the physiology of the inner wall of Schlemm's canal and the conventional outflow tissues.
Authors: Tomokazu Souma; Stuart W Tompson; Benjamin R Thomson; Owen M Siggs; Krishnakumar Kizhatil; Shinji Yamaguchi; Liang Feng; Vachiranee Limviphuvadh; Kristina N Whisenhunt; Sebastian Maurer-Stroh; Tammy L Yanovitch; Luba Kalaydjieva; Dimitar N Azmanov; Simone Finzi; Lucia Mauri; Shahrbanou Javadiyan; Emmanuelle Souzeau; Tiger Zhou; Alex W Hewitt; Bethany Kloss; Kathryn P Burdon; David A Mackey; Keri F Allen; Jonathan B Ruddle; Sing-Hui Lim; Steve Rozen; Khanh-Nhat Tran-Viet; Xiaorong Liu; Simon John; Janey L Wiggs; Francesca Pasutto; Jamie E Craig; Jing Jin; Susan E Quaggin; Terri L Young Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2016-06-06 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Jason Y H Chang; W Daniel Stamer; Jacques Bertrand; A Thomas Read; Catherine M Marando; C Ross Ethier; Darryl R Overby Journal: Am J Physiol Cell Physiol Date: 2015-06-03 Impact factor: 4.249
Authors: Darryl R Overby; Jacques Bertrand; Ozan-Yüksel Tektas; Alexandra Boussommier-Calleja; Martin Schicht; C Ross Ethier; David F Woodward; W Daniel Stamer; Elke Lütjen-Drecoll Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-07-15 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Ted S Acott; Mary J Kelley; Kate E Keller; Janice A Vranka; Diala W Abu-Hassan; Xinbo Li; Mini Aga; John M Bradley Journal: J Ocul Pharmacol Ther Date: 2014-01-08 Impact factor: 2.671