Literature DB >> 21169398

Why is the subendocardium more vulnerable to ischemia? A new paradigm.

Dotan Algranati1, Ghassan S Kassab, Yoram Lanir.   

Abstract

Myocardial ischemia is transmurally heterogeneous where the subendocardium is at higher risk. Stenosis induces reduced perfusion pressure, blood flow redistribution away from the subendocardium, and consequent subendocardial vulnerability. We propose that the flow redistribution stems from the higher compliance of the subendocardial vasculature. This new paradigm was tested using network flow simulation based on measured coronary anatomy, vessel flow and mechanics, and myocardium-vessel interactions. Flow redistribution was quantified by the relative change in the subendocardial-to-subepicardial perfusion ratio under a 60-mmHg perfusion pressure reduction. Myocardial contraction was found to induce the following: 1) more compressive loading and subsequent lower transvascular pressure in deeper vessels, 2) consequent higher compliance of the subendocardial vasculature, and 3) substantial flow redistribution, i.e., a 20% drop in the subendocardial-to-subepicardial flow ratio under the prescribed reduction in perfusion pressure. This flow redistribution was found to occur primarily because the vessel compliance is nonlinear (pressure dependent). The observed thinner subendocardial vessel walls were predicted to induce a higher compliance of the subendocardial vasculature and greater flow redistribution. Subendocardial perfusion was predicted to improve with a reduction of either heart rate or left ventricular pressure under low perfusion pressure. In conclusion, subendocardial vulnerability to a acute reduction in perfusion pressure stems primarily from differences in vascular compliance induced by transmural differences in both extravascular loading and vessel wall thickness. Subendocardial ischemia can be improved by a reduction of heart rate and left ventricular pressure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21169398      PMCID: PMC3064294          DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00473.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6135            Impact factor:   4.733


  42 in total

1.  Does systolic subepicardial perfusion come from retrograde subendocardial flow?

Authors:  A E Flynn; D L Coggins; M Goto; G S Aldea; R E Austin; J W Doucette; W Husseini; J I Hoffman
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1992-06

2.  Microvascular pressures and resistances in the left ventricular subepicardium and subendocardium.

Authors:  W M Chilian
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 3.  Pressure-flow relations in coronary circulation.

Authors:  J I Hoffman; J A Spaan
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 37.312

4.  Coronary microvascular responses to reductions in perfusion pressure. Evidence for persistent arteriolar vasomotor tone during coronary hypoperfusion.

Authors:  W M Chilian; S M Layne
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 17.367

5.  Myogenic activity in isolated subepicardial and subendocardial coronary arterioles.

Authors:  L Kuo; M J Davis; W M Chilian
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1988-12

6.  Model of the coronary circulation based on pressure dependence of coronary resistance and compliance.

Authors:  P Bruinsma; T Arts; J Dankelman; J A Spaan
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  1988 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 17.165

7.  Coronary pressure-flow relationships. Controversial issues and probable implications.

Authors:  F J Klocke; R E Mates; J M Canty; A K Ellis
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 17.367

8.  Morphometry of pig coronary arterial trees.

Authors:  G S Kassab; C A Rider; N J Tang; Y C Fung
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1993-07

Review 9.  Regulation of transmural myocardial blood flow.

Authors:  J I Hoffman; R W Baer; F L Hanley; L M Messina
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 2.097

10.  Cardiac contraction affects deep myocardial vessels predominantly.

Authors:  M Goto; A E Flynn; J W Doucette; C M Jansen; M M Stork; D L Coggins; D D Muehrcke; W K Husseini; J I Hoffman
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1991-11
View more
  41 in total

1.  Detection of myocardial iron overload by two-dimensional speckle tracking in patients with beta-thalassaemia major: a combined echocardiographic and T2* segmental CMR study.

Authors:  Fausto Pizzino; Antonella Meloni; Anna Terrizzi; Tommaso Casini; Anna Spasiano; Carlo Cosmi; Massimo Allò; Concetta Zito; Scipione Carerj; Giovanni Donato Aquaro; Gianluca Di Bella; Alessia Pepe
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Diameter-dependent axial prestretch of porcine coronary arteries and veins.

Authors:  Xiaomei Guo; Yi Liu; Ghassan S Kassab
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2011-12-08

3.  Slackness between vessel and myocardium is necessary for coronary flow reserve.

Authors:  Jonathan M Young; Jenny S Choy; Ghassan S Kassab; Yoram Lanir
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 4.  Regulation of Coronary Blood Flow.

Authors:  Adam G Goodwill; Gregory M Dick; Alexander M Kiel; Johnathan D Tune
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 9.090

Review 5.  Myocardial-vessel interaction: role of LV pressure and myocardial contractility.

Authors:  Ghassan S Kassab; Dotan Algranati; Yoram Lanir
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2013-04-20       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Association of ischemic heart disease to global and regional longitudinal strain in asymptomatic aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Helle Gervig Carstensen; Linnea Hornbech Larsen; Christian Hassager; Klaus Fuglsang Kofoed; Jan Skov Jensen; Rasmus Mogelvang
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Assessment of coronary artery stenosis severity and location: quantitative analysis of transmural perfusion gradients by high-resolution MRI versus FFR.

Authors:  Amedeo Chiribiri; Gilion L T F Hautvast; Timothy Lockie; Andreas Schuster; Boris Bigalke; Luca Olivotti; Simon R Redwood; Marcel Breeuwer; Sven Plein; Eike Nagel
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-04-10

8.  Remodeling of left circumflex coronary arterial tree in pacing-induced heart failure.

Authors:  Yunlong Huo; Ghassan S Kassab
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2015-07-09

Review 9.  Cardiac Systolic Mechanics in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: New Insights and Controversies.

Authors:  Chi-In Lo; Yau-Hui Lai; Jih-Jer Wu; Chun-Ho Yun; Chung-Lieh Hung; Bernard E Bulwer; Hung-I Yeh
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.672

Review 10.  Quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging by cardiovascular magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography.

Authors:  K Bratis; I Mahmoud; A Chiribiri; E Nagel
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.