Literature DB >> 1873859

Microvascular pressures and resistances in the left ventricular subepicardium and subendocardium.

W M Chilian1.   

Abstract

These experiments tested the hypothesis that differences in the distribution of subepicardial and subendocardial microvascular resistances may alter the transmural distributions of microvascular pressures. Isolated blood- and physiological saline-perfused porcine hearts were surgically incised to enable exposure of the subendocardial and subepicardial microcirculations. Microvascular pressures were measured during cardiac arrest and maximal vasodilation at various perfusion pressures to formulate relations between perfusion pressure and microvascular pressure in the different subendocardial (both free wall and papillary muscle) and subepicardial segments. Measurements of arteriolar and venular pressures in both myocardial regions were performed in comparably sized vessels (80-120 microns in diameter). At a coronary perfusion pressure of 100 mm Hg, subendocardial arteriolar and venular pressures were 60 +/- 4 and 33 +/- 3 mm Hg, respectively. In contrast, at the same coronary perfusion pressure, arteriolar and venular pressures in the subepicardial microcirculation averaged 80 +/- 6 and 22 +/- 3 mm Hg, respectively (p less than 0.05 versus subendocardium). At all levels of coronary perfusion pressure, arteriolar pressures were significantly lower in the subendocardium than in the subepicardium (p less than 0.05). Venular pressures were also higher in the subendocardial microcirculation than in the subepicardial microcirculation at all but the lowest perfusion pressure (p less than 0.05). The relative distribution of resistances in arteries, microvessels, and veins was also different between the subepicardium and subendocardium. Specifically, in the subendocardium, arterial and venous resistances were higher, percentage-wise, but microvascular resistance was proportionately lower than that in the subepicardium (p less than 0.05). From these data, it is concluded that the distribution of microvascular resistances and pressures is different during maximal vasodilation in the subepicardial and subendocardial microcirculations of the left ventricle. It is also speculated that differences in autoregulatory capacity and vulnerability to ischemia may be partially related to unequal distribution of microvascular resistances across the wall of the left ventricle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1873859     DOI: 10.1161/01.res.69.3.561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Res        ISSN: 0009-7330            Impact factor:   17.367


  40 in total

1.  A pilot study on diagnosis of coronary artery disease using computed tomography first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging at rest.

Authors:  Qi Wang; Jing Qin; Lu-yue Gai; Yun-dai Chen; Wei Dong; Zhi-wei Guan; Zhi-guo Wang; Zhi-jun Sun; Jia-he Tian
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.066

2.  Slackness between vessel and myocardium is necessary for coronary flow reserve.

Authors:  Jonathan M Young; Jenny S Choy; Ghassan S Kassab; Yoram Lanir
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 3.  Magnetic resonance approaches and recent advances in myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Daniel C Lee; Francis J Klocke
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Relation between branching patterns and perfusion in stochastic generated coronary arterial trees.

Authors:  J Dankelman; A J M Cornelissen; J Lagro; E Vanbavel; J A E Spaan
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Biophysical model of the spatial heterogeneity of myocardial flow.

Authors:  Yunlong Huo; Benjamin Kaimovitz; Yoram Lanir; Thomas Wischgoll; Julien I E Hoffman; Ghassan S Kassab
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  The scaling of blood flow resistance: from a single vessel to the entire distal tree.

Authors:  Yunlong Huo; Ghassan S Kassab
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 7.  Myocardial microvascular permeability, interstitial oedema, and compromised cardiac function.

Authors:  Ranjeet M Dongaonkar; Randolph H Stewart; Hans J Geissler; Glen A Laine
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 10.787

8.  Prognostic Implications of Mitral Annular Plane Systolic Excursion in Patients with Hypertension and a Clinical Indication for Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Simone Romano; Robert M Judd; Raymond J Kim; Han W Kim; John F Heitner; Dipan J Shah; Richard B Devereux; Pablo Salazar; Michael Trybula; Richard C Chia; Kaleigh Evans; Afshin Farzaneh-Far
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-11-05

9.  Coronary microcirculation in the beating heart.

Authors:  Fumihiko Kajiya; Toyotaka Yada; Osamu Hiramatsu; Yasuo Ogasawara; Yousuke Inai; Masahito Kajiya
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 10.  Coronary microcirculation: autoregulation and metabolic control.

Authors:  D V DeFily; W M Chilian
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 17.165

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.