INTRODUCTION: transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an emerging technique for the treatment of aortic stenosis. With the advent of percutaneous suture devices for the access point and prosthesis delivery systems of smaller diameter, TAVI has become a truly percutaneous procedure: percutaneous aortic valve replacement (PAVR). Thus, PAVR may be conducted without general anaesthesia (GA). METHODS: We report two centres' experience from PAVR without GA. CoreValve aortic bioprostheses were utilised. The patient selection process and PAVR procedure are described in detail. RESULTS: a total of 30 patients (pts) were treated with PAVR. In 4 pts correction of the initial malposition of the prosthesis required a special technique (2 pts: "snare"; 2 pts: "removing and reinserting"). At 1-month follow up, haemodynamic and clinical improvements were observed: left ventricular ejection fraction increased from 50.8 ± 9.3% to 54.3 ± 8.3% (p=0.02); peak aortic valve gradient decreased from 90.3 ± 26.4 mmHg to 14.8 ± 9.7 mmHg, (p<0.001); NYHA functional class decreased from 3.53 ± 0.93 to 1.45 ± 0.94 (p<0.001). Overall 1-month mortality was 3.3% (1 patient died). CONCLUSION: PAVR without general anaesthesia is a feasible technique, however the role of anaesthesiologists is still important.
INTRODUCTION: transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an emerging technique for the treatment of aortic stenosis. With the advent of percutaneous suture devices for the access point and prosthesis delivery systems of smaller diameter, TAVI has become a truly percutaneous procedure: percutaneous aortic valve replacement (PAVR). Thus, PAVR may be conducted without general anaesthesia (GA). METHODS: We report two centres' experience from PAVR without GA. CoreValve aortic bioprostheses were utilised. The patient selection process and PAVR procedure are described in detail. RESULTS: a total of 30 patients (pts) were treated with PAVR. In 4 pts correction of the initial malposition of the prosthesis required a special technique (2 pts: "snare"; 2 pts: "removing and reinserting"). At 1-month follow up, haemodynamic and clinical improvements were observed: left ventricular ejection fraction increased from 50.8 ± 9.3% to 54.3 ± 8.3% (p=0.02); peak aortic valve gradient decreased from 90.3 ± 26.4 mmHg to 14.8 ± 9.7 mmHg, (p<0.001); NYHA functional class decreased from 3.53 ± 0.93 to 1.45 ± 0.94 (p<0.001). Overall 1-month mortality was 3.3% (1 patient died). CONCLUSION: PAVR without general anaesthesia is a feasible technique, however the role of anaesthesiologists is still important.
Authors: Manolis Vavuranakis; Dimitrios A Vrachatis; Harisios Boudoulas; Theodore G Papaioannou; Carmen Moldovan; Maria G Kariori; Konstantinos I Kalogeras; Panagiota G Pietri; Constantinos Tentolouris; Christodoulos Stefanadis Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2012-05-16 Impact factor: 5.460