Literature DB >> 21168026

Simulating video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: a virtual reality cognitive task simulation.

Brian Solomon1, Costas Bizekis, Sophia L Dellis, Jessica S Donington, Aaron Oliker, Leora B Balsam, Michael Zervos, Aubrey C Galloway, Harvey Pass, Eugene A Grossi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Current video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery training models rely on animals or mannequins to teach procedural skills. These approaches lack inherent teaching/testing capability and are limited by cost, anatomic variations, and single use. In response, we hypothesized that video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery right upper lobe resection could be simulated in a virtual reality environment with commercial software.
METHODS: An anatomy explorer (Maya [Autodesk Inc, San Rafael, Calif] models of the chest and hilar structures) and simulation engine were adapted. Design goals included freedom of port placement, incorporation of well-known anatomic variants, teaching and testing modes, haptic feedback for the dissection, ability to perform the anatomic divisions, and a portable platform.
RESULTS: Preexisting commercial models did not provide sufficient surgical detail, and extensive modeling modifications were required. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery right upper lobe resection simulation is initiated with a random vein and artery variation. The trainee proceeds in a teaching or testing mode. A knowledge database currently includes 13 anatomic identifications and 20 high-yield lung cancer learning points. The "patient" is presented in the left lateral decubitus position. After initial camera port placement, the endoscopic view is displayed and the thoracoscope is manipulated via the haptic device. The thoracoscope port can be relocated; additional ports are placed using an external "operating room" view. Unrestricted endoscopic exploration of the thorax is allowed. An endo-dissector tool allows for hilar dissection, and a virtual stapling device divides structures. The trainee's performance is reported.
CONCLUSIONS: A virtual reality cognitive task simulation can overcome the deficiencies of existing training models. Performance scoring is being validated as we assess this simulator for cognitive and technical surgical education.
Copyright © 2011. Published by Mosby, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21168026     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.09.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  21 in total

1.  Reliable and valid assessment of performance in thoracoscopy.

Authors:  Lars Konge; Per Lehnert; Henrik Jessen Hansen; René Horsleben Petersen; Charlotte Ringsted
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Learning curve associated with VATS lobectomy.

Authors:  René H Petersen; Henrik J Hansen
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-05

3.  Teaching video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy.

Authors:  Philip W Carrott; David R Jones
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy in the animal model.

Authors:  Mercedes de la Torre; Diego Gonzalez-Rivas; Ricardo Fernández-Prado; María Delgado; Eva M Fieira; Alberto Centeno
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 5.  Society for Translational Medicine expert consensus on training and certification standards for surgeons and assistants in minimally invasive surgery for lung cancer.

Authors:  Lunxu Liu; Jiandong Mei; Jie He; Shugeng Gao; Shanqing Li; Jianxing He; Yunchao Huang; Shidong Xu; Weimin Mao; Qunyou Tan; Chun Chen; Xiaofei Li; Zhu Zhang; Gening Jiang; Lin Xu; Lanjun Zhang; Jianhua Fu; Hui Li; Qun Wang; Deruo Liu; Lijie Tan; Qinghua Zhou; Xiangning Fu; Zhongmin Jiang; Haiquan Chen; Wentao Fang; Xun Zhang; Yin Li; Ti Tong; Zhentao Yu; Yongyu Liu; Xiuyi Zhi; Tiansheng Yan; Xingyi Zhang; Todd L Demmy; Mark F Berry; Alexia Belén Gutierrez Pérez; Daniele Cataneo; Andrea Bille; Peter Licht; Gregor J Kocher; Murat Oncel; Serdar Evman; Katrine Jensen; Patrick Bagan; Raul Embun
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Thoracoscopic lobectomy: is a training program feasible with low postoperative morbidity?

Authors:  Andrea Billè; Lawrence Okiror; Wolfram Karenovics; Debajeet Choudhuri; Tom Routledge
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-03-01

Review 7.  The role of wet lab in thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Benedetta Bedetti; Philipp Schnorr; Joachim Schmidt; Marco Scarci
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2017-05-04

Review 8.  3D-CT anatomy for VATS segmentectomy.

Authors:  Kimihiro Shimizu; Seshiru Nakazawa; Toshiteru Nagashima; Hiroyuki Kuwano; Akira Mogi
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2017-07-01

Review 9.  Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy learning curve: what program should be offered in a residency course?

Authors:  Duilio Divisi; Mirko Barone; Gino Zaccagna; Angela De Palma; Francesca Gabriele; Roberto Crisci
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2017-10-18

10.  Computer-based learning: interleaving whole and sectional representation of neuroanatomy.

Authors:  John R Pani; Julia H Chariker; Farah Naaz
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 5.958

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.