Literature DB >> 21166762

First 500 cases of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy from a single UK centre: learning curves of two surgeons.

Naomi Laura Sharma1, Alexandros Papadopoulos, Dominic Lee, John McLoughlin, Sarah L Vowler, Herve Baumert, Anne Y Warren, Vishal Patil, Nimish Shah, David E Neal.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: • To study the outcomes and learning curve of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) in a single centre by two surgeons. PATIENTS AND METHODS: • In total, 500 consecutive patients underwent RALP between 2005 and 2009 carried out by two surgeons. Using an ethically-approved database, prospective data collection of demographic, surgical, oncological and functional outcomes (patient reported) was performed, with up to 4 years of follow-up. • The learning curves of both surgeons were analyzed and, in addition, the first 100 and last 100 patients were compared to determine the effect of surgeon experience.
RESULTS: • The mean age of the patients was 61.5 years and mean preoperative prostate-specific antigen was 7.0 µg/L. Clinical stages were T1 in 63.2%, T2 in 33.8% and T3 in 3.0% of patients. Median (range) operating time was 170 (63-420) min and median (range) blood loss was 200 (20-3000) mL, with significant improvements for both surgeons with increasing experience (P < 0.001 and P= 0.029, respectively). • Pathological stages were pT2 in 53.4%, pT3a in 41.6%, pT3b in 4.0% and pT4 in 0.6% of patients. Overall, the positive margin rate (PMR) was 24.0% and stage-specific rates were 16.1%, 30.4%, 55.0% and 100.0% for pT2, pT3a, pT3b and pT4 disease, respectively. In the last 50 cases performed by each surgeon, the PMRs for pT2 and pT3a disease were 8.0% and 19.1% (surgeon 1) and 12.9% and 23.5% (surgeon 2). • At 12 months of follow-up, 91.3% of patients were continent and, by 48 months of follow-up, 75% of men with preoperative potency who underwent bilateral nerve-sparing RALP were potent.
CONCLUSION: • This is the first report of two surgeons' learning curves in a single centre and shows that key learning curve outcomes continued to improve during the series, suggesting that the learning curve for RALP may be longer than has been previously suggested.
© 2010 THE AUTHORS. BJU INTERNATIONAL © 2010 BJU INTERNATIONAL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21166762     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09941.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  13 in total

1.  [Radical prostatectomy - pro laparoscopic].

Authors:  H M Do; S Holze; H Qazi; A Dietel; T Häfner; E Liatsikos; J-U Stolzenburg
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Learning curve assessment of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open-surgery controls from the premier perspective database.

Authors:  John W Davis; Usha S Kreaden; Jessica Gabbert; Raju Thomas
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Adding a newly trained surgeon into a high-volume robotic prostatectomy group: are outcomes compromised?

Authors:  Luchen Wang; Mireya Diaz; Hans Stricker; James O Peabody; Mani Menon; Craig G Rogers
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-06-27

Review 4.  [Quality control in the implementation of new surgical procedures: Da Vinci robot-assisted systems].

Authors:  G Niegisch; R Rabenalt; P Albers
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 5.  The safety of urologic robotic surgery depends on the skills of the surgeon.

Authors:  Erika Palagonia; Elio Mazzone; Geert De Naeyer; Frederiek D'Hondt; Justin Collins; Pawel Wisz; Fijs W B Van Leeuwen; Henk Van Der Poel; Peter Schatteman; Alexandre Mottrie; Paolo Dell'Oglio
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  A systematic review of the learning curve in robotic surgery: range and heterogeneity.

Authors:  I Kassite; T Bejan-Angoulvant; H Lardy; A Binet
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  A multi-surgeon learning curve analysis of overall and site-specific positive surgical margins after RARP and implications for training.

Authors:  Carlo Gandi; Angelo Totaro; Riccardo Bientinesi; Filippo Marino; Francesco Pierconti; Maurizio Martini; Andrea Russo; Marco Racioppi; PierFrancesco Bassi; Emilio Sacco
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-02-28

Review 8.  Learning curves in laparoscopic and robot-assisted prostate surgery: a systematic search and review.

Authors:  Nikolaos Grivas; Ioannis Zachos; Georgios Georgiadis; Markos Karavitakis; Vasilis Tzortzis; Charalampos Mamoulakis
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-09-04       Impact factor: 3.661

9.  A comparison of operative and margin outcomes from surgeon learning curves in robot assisted radical prostatectomy in a changing referral practice.

Authors:  A Jaulim; A Srinivasan; S Hori; N Kumar; A Y Warren; N C Shah; V J Gnanapragasam
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  Impact of intraoperative fluid administration on outcome in patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy--a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Tobias Piegeler; Pamela Dreessen; Sereina M Graber; Sarah R Haile; Daniel Max Schmid; Beatrice Beck-Schimmer
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 2.217

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.