Literature DB >> 21166536

Outcome measures for practice.

Jason L Whipple1, Michael J Lambert.   

Abstract

The current review targets efforts to use outcome measures in routine care for the purpose of enhancing psychotherapy outcome, particularly for patients who are predicted to have a negative treatment outcome. The place of outcome measures in solving the negative effects problem is emphasized, with a narrow focus on one set of measures that is relatively well advanced in its clinical utility. This clinical innovation relies on research-based clinical decision tools that provide psychotherapists with timely warnings and problem-solving strategies when a patient deviates from an expected treatment response. Summary of a meta-analytic review using this patient feedback methodology suggests that measuring, monitoring, predicting treatment failure, and providing clinical support tools to clinicians enhance treatment outcome for patients who have an early negative treatment response. Other measures are then briefly reviewed before we turn to future directions. Clinicians are encouraged to employ these methods in routine practice.
© 2011 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21166536     DOI: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-040510-143938

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol        ISSN: 1548-5943            Impact factor:   18.561


  12 in total

1.  Chronic pain and the interpersonal theory of suicide.

Authors:  Keith G Wilson; John Kowal; Peter R Henderson; Lachlan A McWilliams; Katherine Péloquin
Journal:  Rehabil Psychol       Date:  2013-02

2.  Using Routine Outcome Measures to Provide Feedback at the Service Agency Level.

Authors:  David Roe; Liron Lapid; Vered Baloush-Kleinman; Paula Garber-Epstein; Miriam Isolde Gornemann; Marc Gelkopf
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2016-06-20

Review 3.  Annual Research Review: Building a science of personalized intervention for youth mental health.

Authors:  Mei Yi Ng; John R Weisz
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 8.982

4.  Development and validation of 21-item outcome inventory (OI-21).

Authors:  Nahathai Wongpakaran; Tinakon Wongpakaran; Zsuzsanna Kövi
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-06-07

Review 5.  Outcomes Accountability Systems for Early Childhood Disruptive Behaviors: A Scoping Review of Availability.

Authors:  Helen Fan Yu-Lefler; Jill Marsteller; Anne W Riley
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2022-04-25

6.  Change in suicidal ideation after interdisciplinary treatment of chronic pain.

Authors:  John Kowal; Keith G Wilson; Peter R Henderson; Lachlan A McWilliams
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.442

7.  Usability evaluation of a web-based support system for people with a schizophrenia diagnosis.

Authors:  Lian van der Krieke; Ando C Emerencia; Marco Aiello; Sjoerd Sytema
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Effective components of feedback from Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM) in youth mental health care: study protocol of a three-arm parallel-group randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Maartje A M S van Sonsbeek; Giel G J M Hutschemaekers; Jan Willem Veerman; Bea B G Tiemens
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 3.630

9.  Using Patient Reported Outcome Measures to Improve Service Effectiveness (UPROMISE): Training clinicians to Use Outcome Measures in Child Mental Health.

Authors:  Julian Edbrooke-Childs; Miranda Wolpert; Jessica Deighton
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2016-05

10.  Uses and abuses of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs): potential iatrogenic impact of PROMs implementation and how it can be mitigated.

Authors:  Miranda Wolpert
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2014-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.