Literature DB >> 27324903

Using Routine Outcome Measures to Provide Feedback at the Service Agency Level.

David Roe1,2, Liron Lapid3,4, Vered Baloush-Kleinman5, Paula Garber-Epstein2, Miriam Isolde Gornemann2, Marc Gelkopf1,2.   

Abstract

The use of routine outcome measurement (ROM) to assess service effectiveness has been on the rise in mental health settings. However, there is a scarcity of information on the use of ROM data to provide feedback to teams of service providers. In this paper we review the existing literature to identify the principles that can guide the use of ROM data as feedback with the aim to improve quality of service provision in mental health settings. We present a pilot trial of 12 agencies participating in group feedback sessions. The guiding principles and core processes, the procedure and implementation in a pilot trial, lessons learned and future directions are discussed. Based on this experience we conclude that using ROM to implement group feedback among mental health stakeholders is feasible and can generate discussions and directions for improvement.

Keywords:  Feedback to mental health service agencies; Mental health; Rehabilitation services; Routine outcome measures

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27324903     DOI: 10.1007/s10597-016-0039-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Community Ment Health J        ISSN: 0010-3853


  40 in total

1.  The perception of needs for care in staff and patients in community-based mental health services. The South-Verona Outcome Project 3.

Authors:  A Lasalvia; M Ruggeri; M A Mazzi; R B Dall'Agnola
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.392

2.  Effects of routine feedback to clinicians on mental health outcomes of youths: results of a randomized trial.

Authors:  Leonard Bickman; Susan Douglas Kelley; Carolyn Breda; Ana Regina de Andrade; Manuel Riemer
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Understanding the differential impact of outcome monitoring: therapist variables that moderate feedback effects in a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Kim de Jong; Patricia van Sluis; M Annet Nugter; Willem J Heiser; Philip Spinhoven
Journal:  Psychother Res       Date:  2012-04-02

4.  The art and science of using routine outcome measurement in mental health benchmarking.

Authors:  Roderick McKay; Tim Coombs; David Duerden
Journal:  Australas Psychiatry       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 1.369

5.  Patient-reported outcomes in child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS): use of idiographic and standardized measures.

Authors:  Miranda Wolpert; Tamsin Ford; Emma Trustam; Duncan Law; Jessica Deighton; Halina Flannery; Andrew J B Fugard; Rew J B Fugard
Journal:  J Ment Health       Date:  2012-04

Review 6.  Routine outcome monitoring and feedback on physical or mental health status: evidence and theory.

Authors:  Ingrid V E Carlier; Denise Meuldijk; Irene M Van Vliet; Esther Van Fenema; Nic J A Van der Wee; Frans G Zitman
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 2.431

7.  Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS). Research and development.

Authors:  J K Wing; A S Beevor; R H Curtis; S B Park; S Hadden; A Burns
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 9.319

8.  The Schizophrenia Care and Assessment Program Health Questionnaire (SCAP-HQ): an instrument to assess outcomes of schizophrenia care.

Authors:  Anthony F Lehman; Ellen P Fischer; Leticia Postrado; Janine Delahanty; Bryan M Johnstone; Patricia A Russo; William H Crown
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 9.  Meta-analysis: audit and feedback features impact effectiveness on care quality.

Authors:  Sylvia J Hysong
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Achievements in mental health outcome measurement in Australia: Reflections on progress made by the Australian Mental Health Outcomes and Classification Network (AMHOCN).

Authors:  Philip Burgess; Tim Coombs; Adam Clarke; Rosemary Dickson; Jane Pirkis
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Syst       Date:  2012-05-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.