Literature DB >> 21165704

[LDL-cholesterol in secondary prevention: goal-attainment in patients on lipid-lowering drugs in private practice and in hospitals in Austria (ZIEL)].

Bernhard Föger1, Josef R Patsch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A hospital-based screening project (HSP) in Austria found 47% of high-risk patients (LDL-C < 100 mg/dl) and 24% of very high-risk patients (LDL-C < 70 mg/dl) at goal. Separate data for the sexes were not reported. We analyze whether LDL-C goal attainment in patients with manifest atherosclerosis and/or diabetes on stable lipid-lowering treatment differs between private practice and hospital and between men and women. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From September to November 2007, 49 Austrian centers (36 private practice, 13 hospitals) documented vascular morbidity, lipid levels, and lipid lowering treatment in patients with high risk (atherosclerosis or diabetes, n = 978) and very high risk (coronary heart disease and diabetes or acute coronary syndrome, n = 322).
RESULTS: 75% and 25% of the 1300 patients were high and very high risk, respectively. LDL-C goals of < 100 and < 70 mg/dl, respectively, were attained by 45.4% and 26.4% of patients (p < 0.001). A similar percentage of patients with very high risk was found in men and women (26.4% vs. 22.9%, NS) and goal attainment was not influenced by sex (high risk: 47.2% (m) vs. 43.8% (w), NS and very high risk: 29.1% (m) vs. 22.4% (w), NS). In patients with high risk, 41.6% treated in private practice vs. 57.9% treated in the hospital were at goal (p < 0.001). In patients with very high risk, 15.9% treated in private practice vs. 45.2% treated in the hospital were at goal (p < 0.001). Lower goal-attainment in private practice occurred despite significantly more intensive lipid intervention and probably reflects higher baseline LDL-C. LDL-C > 100 mg/dl leads to a more aggressive lipid lowering in approx. 70% of patients, irrespective of whether they are treated in private practice or in the hospital. LDL-C between 70 and 100 mg/dl, however, leads to a more aggressive lipid lowering in < 5% of patients, irrespective of whether they are high or very high risk.
CONCLUSION: As observed in EUROASPIRE III for other European countries, there is substantial potential for improvement in lipid control in Austrian cardiovascular high-risk patients, irrespective of whether they are treated in private practice or in the hospital.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21165704     DOI: 10.1007/s00508-010-1498-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr        ISSN: 0043-5325            Impact factor:   1.704


  8 in total

1.  Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90,056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins.

Authors:  C Baigent; A Keech; P M Kearney; L Blackwell; G Buck; C Pollicino; A Kirby; T Sourjina; R Peto; R Collins; R Simes
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005-09-27       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Clinical reality of coronary prevention guidelines: a comparison of EUROASPIRE I and II in nine countries. EUROASPIRE I and II Group. European Action on Secondary Prevention by Intervention to Reduce Events.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-03-31       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  High-dose atorvastatin vs usual-dose simvastatin for secondary prevention after myocardial infarction: the IDEAL study: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Terje R Pedersen; Ole Faergeman; John J P Kastelein; Anders G Olsson; Matti J Tikkanen; Ingar Holme; Mogens Lytken Larsen; Fredrik S Bendiksen; Christina Lindahl; Michael Szarek; John Tsai
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-11-16       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Intensive lipid lowering with atorvastatin in patients with stable coronary disease.

Authors:  John C LaRosa; Scott M Grundy; David D Waters; Charles Shear; Philip Barter; Jean-Charles Fruchart; Antonio M Gotto; Heiner Greten; John J P Kastelein; James Shepherd; Nanette K Wenger
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-03-08       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines.

Authors:  Scott M Grundy; James I Cleeman; C Noel Bairey Merz; H Bryan Brewer; Luther T Clark; Donald B Hunninghake; Richard C Pasternak; Sidney C Smith; Neil J Stone
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-07-13       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  [Lipid profiles and therapy status in the secondary prevention of high risk patients with cardiovascular disease and/or diabetes mellitus: the Austrian Hospital Screening Project (HSP)].

Authors:  Michael Roden; Kurt Huber
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.704

7.  Cardiovascular prevention guidelines in daily practice: a comparison of EUROASPIRE I, II, and III surveys in eight European countries.

Authors:  Kornelia Kotseva; David Wood; Guy De Backer; Dirk De Bacquer; Kalevi Pyörälä; Ulrich Keil
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Use of recommended medications after myocardial infarction in Austria.

Authors:  Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; Anna E Bucsics; Alexandra Schautzer; Peter Wieninger; Michaela Pogantsch
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 8.082

  8 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Benefits and pitfalls of cardiovascular medication in seniors.

Authors:  Hana Matejovska Kubesova; Pavel Weber; Hana Meluzinova; Katarina Bielakova; Jan Matejovsky
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 2.  Lipid lowering therapy in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Bernhard Föger
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2011-06

3.  Lipid lowering therapy in primary and secondary prevention in Austria: are LDL-C goals achieved? : Results from the DA VINCI study.

Authors:  Peter Siostrzonek; Helmut Brath; Robert Zweiker; Heinz Drexel; Robert Hoelzl; Margit Hemetsberger; Kausik K Ray
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 2.275

4.  Are there differences in LDL-C target value attainment in Austrian federal states? Yes!

Authors:  Max Pichler; Dominik Lautsch; Claudia Adler; Karl Bögl; Heinz Drexel; Bernd Eber; Christiane Fauer; Johannes Föchterle; Bernhard Föger; Karin Gansch; Peter Grafinger; Monika Lechleitner; Bernhard Ludvik; Gerald Maurer; Reinhard Mörz; Bernhard Paulweber; Karl Peter Pfeiffer; Rudolf Prager; Gerhard Stark; Hermann Toplak; Otto Traindl; Raimund Weitgasser
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2013-08-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.