Bernhard Föger1, Josef R Patsch. 1. Abteilung für Innere Medizin, LKH Bregenz, Bregenz, Austria. bernhard.foeger@lkhb.at
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A hospital-based screening project (HSP) in Austria found 47% of high-risk patients (LDL-C < 100 mg/dl) and 24% of very high-risk patients (LDL-C < 70 mg/dl) at goal. Separate data for the sexes were not reported. We analyze whether LDL-C goal attainment in patients with manifest atherosclerosis and/or diabetes on stable lipid-lowering treatment differs between private practice and hospital and between men and women. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From September to November 2007, 49 Austrian centers (36 private practice, 13 hospitals) documented vascular morbidity, lipid levels, and lipid lowering treatment in patients with high risk (atherosclerosis or diabetes, n = 978) and very high risk (coronary heart disease and diabetes or acute coronary syndrome, n = 322). RESULTS: 75% and 25% of the 1300 patients were high and very high risk, respectively. LDL-C goals of < 100 and < 70 mg/dl, respectively, were attained by 45.4% and 26.4% of patients (p < 0.001). A similar percentage of patients with very high risk was found in men and women (26.4% vs. 22.9%, NS) and goal attainment was not influenced by sex (high risk: 47.2% (m) vs. 43.8% (w), NS and very high risk: 29.1% (m) vs. 22.4% (w), NS). In patients with high risk, 41.6% treated in private practice vs. 57.9% treated in the hospital were at goal (p < 0.001). In patients with very high risk, 15.9% treated in private practice vs. 45.2% treated in the hospital were at goal (p < 0.001). Lower goal-attainment in private practice occurred despite significantly more intensive lipid intervention and probably reflects higher baseline LDL-C. LDL-C > 100 mg/dl leads to a more aggressive lipid lowering in approx. 70% of patients, irrespective of whether they are treated in private practice or in the hospital. LDL-C between 70 and 100 mg/dl, however, leads to a more aggressive lipid lowering in < 5% of patients, irrespective of whether they are high or very high risk. CONCLUSION: As observed in EUROASPIRE III for other European countries, there is substantial potential for improvement in lipid control in Austrian cardiovascular high-risk patients, irrespective of whether they are treated in private practice or in the hospital.
BACKGROUND: A hospital-based screening project (HSP) in Austria found 47% of high-risk patients (LDL-C < 100 mg/dl) and 24% of very high-risk patients (LDL-C < 70 mg/dl) at goal. Separate data for the sexes were not reported. We analyze whether LDL-C goal attainment in patients with manifest atherosclerosis and/or diabetes on stable lipid-lowering treatment differs between private practice and hospital and between men and women. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From September to November 2007, 49 Austrian centers (36 private practice, 13 hospitals) documented vascular morbidity, lipid levels, and lipid lowering treatment in patients with high risk (atherosclerosis or diabetes, n = 978) and very high risk (coronary heart disease and diabetes or acute coronary syndrome, n = 322). RESULTS: 75% and 25% of the 1300 patients were high and very high risk, respectively. LDL-C goals of < 100 and < 70 mg/dl, respectively, were attained by 45.4% and 26.4% of patients (p < 0.001). A similar percentage of patients with very high risk was found in men and women (26.4% vs. 22.9%, NS) and goal attainment was not influenced by sex (high risk: 47.2% (m) vs. 43.8% (w), NS and very high risk: 29.1% (m) vs. 22.4% (w), NS). In patients with high risk, 41.6% treated in private practice vs. 57.9% treated in the hospital were at goal (p < 0.001). In patients with very high risk, 15.9% treated in private practice vs. 45.2% treated in the hospital were at goal (p < 0.001). Lower goal-attainment in private practice occurred despite significantly more intensive lipid intervention and probably reflects higher baseline LDL-C. LDL-C > 100 mg/dl leads to a more aggressive lipid lowering in approx. 70% of patients, irrespective of whether they are treated in private practice or in the hospital. LDL-C between 70 and 100 mg/dl, however, leads to a more aggressive lipid lowering in < 5% of patients, irrespective of whether they are high or very high risk. CONCLUSION: As observed in EUROASPIRE III for other European countries, there is substantial potential for improvement in lipid control in Austrian cardiovascular high-risk patients, irrespective of whether they are treated in private practice or in the hospital.
Authors: C Baigent; A Keech; P M Kearney; L Blackwell; G Buck; C Pollicino; A Kirby; T Sourjina; R Peto; R Collins; R Simes Journal: Lancet Date: 2005-09-27 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Terje R Pedersen; Ole Faergeman; John J P Kastelein; Anders G Olsson; Matti J Tikkanen; Ingar Holme; Mogens Lytken Larsen; Fredrik S Bendiksen; Christina Lindahl; Michael Szarek; John Tsai Journal: JAMA Date: 2005-11-16 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: John C LaRosa; Scott M Grundy; David D Waters; Charles Shear; Philip Barter; Jean-Charles Fruchart; Antonio M Gotto; Heiner Greten; John J P Kastelein; James Shepherd; Nanette K Wenger Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-03-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Scott M Grundy; James I Cleeman; C Noel Bairey Merz; H Bryan Brewer; Luther T Clark; Donald B Hunninghake; Richard C Pasternak; Sidney C Smith; Neil J Stone Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-07-13 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Kornelia Kotseva; David Wood; Guy De Backer; Dirk De Bacquer; Kalevi Pyörälä; Ulrich Keil Journal: Lancet Date: 2009-03-14 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; Anna E Bucsics; Alexandra Schautzer; Peter Wieninger; Michaela Pogantsch Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2007-12-07 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: Hana Matejovska Kubesova; Pavel Weber; Hana Meluzinova; Katarina Bielakova; Jan Matejovsky Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr Date: 2013-07-12 Impact factor: 1.704
Authors: Peter Siostrzonek; Helmut Brath; Robert Zweiker; Heinz Drexel; Robert Hoelzl; Margit Hemetsberger; Kausik K Ray Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr Date: 2021-12-06 Impact factor: 2.275
Authors: Max Pichler; Dominik Lautsch; Claudia Adler; Karl Bögl; Heinz Drexel; Bernd Eber; Christiane Fauer; Johannes Föchterle; Bernhard Föger; Karin Gansch; Peter Grafinger; Monika Lechleitner; Bernhard Ludvik; Gerald Maurer; Reinhard Mörz; Bernhard Paulweber; Karl Peter Pfeiffer; Rudolf Prager; Gerhard Stark; Hermann Toplak; Otto Traindl; Raimund Weitgasser Journal: Wien Med Wochenschr Date: 2013-08-27