Literature DB >> 16287954

High-dose atorvastatin vs usual-dose simvastatin for secondary prevention after myocardial infarction: the IDEAL study: a randomized controlled trial.

Terje R Pedersen1, Ole Faergeman, John J P Kastelein, Anders G Olsson, Matti J Tikkanen, Ingar Holme, Mogens Lytken Larsen, Fredrik S Bendiksen, Christina Lindahl, Michael Szarek, John Tsai.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Evidence suggests that more intensive lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) than is commonly applied clinically will provide further benefit in stable coronary artery disease.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of 2 strategies of lipid lowering on the risk of cardiovascular disease among patients with a previous myocardial infarction (MI). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The IDEAL study, a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end-point evaluation trial conducted at 190 ambulatory cardiology care and specialist practices in northern Europe between March 1999 and March 2005 with a median follow-up of 4.8 years, which enrolled 8888 patients aged 80 years or younger with a history of acute MI.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive a high dose of atorvastatin (80 mg/d; n = 4439), or usual-dose simvastatin (20 mg/d; n = 4449). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Occurrence of a major coronary event, defined as coronary death, confirmed nonfatal acute MI, or cardiac arrest with resuscitation.
RESULTS: During treatment, mean LDL-C levels were 104 (SE, 0.3) mg/dL in the simvastatin group and 81 (SE, 0.3) mg/dL in the atorvastatin group. A major coronary event occurred in 463 simvastatin patients (10.4%) and in 411 atorvastatin patients (9.3%) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.89; 95% CI, 0.78-1.01; P = .07). Nonfatal acute MI occurred in 321 (7.2%) and 267 (6.0%) in the 2 groups (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.71-0.98; P = .02), but no differences were seen in the 2 other components of the primary end point. Major cardiovascular events occurred in 608 and 533 in the 2 groups, respectively (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.77-0.98; P = .02). Occurrence of any coronary event was reported in 1059 simvastatin and 898 atorvastatin patients (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.76-0.91; P<.001). Noncardiovascular death occurred in 156 (3.5%) and 143 (3.2%) in the 2 groups (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.73-1.15; P = .47). Death from any cause occurred in 374 (8.4%) in the simvastatin group and 366 (8.2%) in the atorvastatin group (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.85-1.13; P = .81). Patients in the atorvastatin group had higher rates of drug discontinuation due to nonserious adverse events; transaminase elevation resulted in 43 (1.0%) vs 5 (0.1%) withdrawals (P<.001). Serious myopathy and rhabdomyolysis were rare in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study of patients with previous MI, intensive lowering of LDL-C did not result in a significant reduction in the primary outcome of major coronary events, but did reduce the risk of other composite secondary end points and nonfatal acute MI. There were no differences in cardiovascular or all-cause mortality. Patients with MI may benefit from intensive lowering of LDL-C without an increase in noncardiovascular mortality or other serious adverse reactions.Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00159835.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16287954     DOI: 10.1001/jama.294.19.2437

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  302 in total

1.  Incomparable effectiveness--apples to apples?

Authors:  F David Winter; Kevin R Wheelan
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 2.  Statin effects on both low-density lipoproteins and high-density lipoproteins: is there a dual benefit?

Authors:  Kiyoko Uno; Stephen J Nicholls
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.113

3.  Residual cardiovascular risk in secondary prevention.

Authors:  Alberto Zambon
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.397

4.  Impact of high dose statin trials on hospital prescribers.

Authors:  Thomas I Barron; Kathleen Bennett; John Feely
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-11-18       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Canadian Cardiovascular Society position statement--recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of dyslipidemia and prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Ruth McPherson; Jiri Frohlich; George Fodor; Jacques Genest
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.223

6.  [New AHA and ACC guidelines on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk : Statement of the D•A•CH Society for Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases, the Austrian Atherosclerosis Society and the Working Group on Lipids and Atherosclerosis (AGLA) of the Swiss Society for Cardiology].

Authors:  G Klose; F U Beil; H Dieplinger; A von Eckardstein; B Föger; I Gouni-Berthold; W Koenig; G M Kostner; U Landmesser; U Laufs; F Leistikow; W März; M Merkel; D Müller-Wieland; G Noll; K G Parhofer; B Paulweber; W Riesen; J R Schaefer; E Steinhagen-Thiessen; A Steinmetz; H Toplak; C Wanner; E Windler
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 7.  Atherosclerosis surrogate imaging trials come of age: for better or for worse?

Authors:  Michael H Davidson; Ewa Dembowski
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.931

8.  Cost effectiveness of intensive lipid-lowering treatment for patients with congestive heart failure and coronary heart disease in the US.

Authors:  Virginia M Rosen; Douglas C A Taylor; Hemangi Parekh; Ankur Pandya; David Thompson; Andreas Kuznik; David D Waters; Michael Drummond; Milton C Weinstein
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 9.  LDL cholesterol goals in high-risk patients: how low do we go and how do we get there?

Authors:  Joost Besseling; Julian van Capelleveen; John J P Kastelein; G Kees Hovingh
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  Cardiovascular and economic outcomes after initiation of lipid-lowering therapy with atorvastatin vs simvastatin in an employed population.

Authors:  Ross J Simpson; James Signorovitch; Howard Birnbaum; Jasmina Ivanova; Cristina Connolly; Yohanne Kidolezi; Andreas Kuznik
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 7.616

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.