Literature DB >> 21164484

Greenhouse gas mitigation can reduce sea-ice loss and increase polar bear persistence.

Steven C Amstrup1, Eric T Deweaver, David C Douglas, Bruce G Marcot, George M Durner, Cecilia M Bitz, David A Bailey.   

Abstract

On the basis of projected losses of their essential sea-ice habitats, a United States Geological Survey research team concluded in 2007 that two-thirds of the world's polar bears (Ursus maritimus) could disappear by mid-century if business-as-usual greenhouse gas emissions continue. That projection, however, did not consider the possible benefits of greenhouse gas mitigation. A key question is whether temperature increases lead to proportional losses of sea-ice habitat, or whether sea-ice cover crosses a tipping point and irreversibly collapses when temperature reaches a critical threshold. Such a tipping point would mean future greenhouse gas mitigation would confer no conservation benefits to polar bears. Here we show, using a general circulation model, that substantially more sea-ice habitat would be retained if greenhouse gas rise is mitigated. We also show, with Bayesian network model outcomes, that increased habitat retention under greenhouse gas mitigation means that polar bears could persist throughout the century in greater numbers and more areas than in the business-as-usual case. Our general circulation model outcomes did not reveal thresholds leading to irreversible loss of ice; instead, a linear relationship between global mean surface air temperature and sea-ice habitat substantiated the hypothesis that sea-ice thermodynamics can overcome albedo feedbacks proposed to cause sea-ice tipping points. Our outcomes indicate that rapid summer ice losses in models and observations represent increased volatility of a thinning sea-ice cover, rather than tipping-point behaviour. Mitigation-driven Bayesian network outcomes show that previously predicted declines in polar bear distribution and numbers are not unavoidable. Because polar bears are sentinels of the Arctic marine ecosystem and trends in their sea-ice habitats foreshadow future global changes, mitigating greenhouse gas emissions to improve polar bear status would have conservation benefits throughout and beyond the Arctic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21164484     DOI: 10.1038/nature09653

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  10 in total

1.  Global warming in the twenty-first century: an alternative scenario.

Authors:  J Hansen; M Sato; R Ruedy; A Lacis; V Oinas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The climate change commitment.

Authors:  T M L Wigley
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-03-18       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Climate change. Is battered Arctic Sea ice down for the count?

Authors:  Richard A Kerr
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-10-05       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Tipping elements in the Earth's climate system.

Authors:  Timothy M Lenton; Hermann Held; Elmar Kriegler; Jim W Hall; Wolfgang Lucht; Stefan Rahmstorf; Hans Joachim Schellnhuber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Nonlinear threshold behavior during the loss of Arctic sea ice.

Authors:  I Eisenman; J S Wettlaufer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  On avoiding dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system: formidable challenges ahead.

Authors:  V Ramanathan; Y Feng
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The future of ice sheets and sea ice: between reversible retreat and unstoppable loss.

Authors:  Dirk Notz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-11-02       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Reduced body size and cub recruitment in polar bears associated with sea ice decline.

Authors:  Karyn D Rode; Steven C Amstrup; Eric V Regehr
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.657

9.  Climate change threatens polar bear populations: a stochastic demographic analysis.

Authors:  Christine M Hunter; Hal Caswell; Michael C Runge; Eric V Regehr; Steve C Amstrup; Ian Stirling
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.499

10.  Survival and breeding of polar bears in the southern Beaufort Sea in relation to sea ice.

Authors:  Eric V Regehr; Christine M Hunter; Hal Caswell; Steven C Amstrup; Ian Stirling
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2009-09-14       Impact factor: 5.091

  10 in total
  14 in total

1.  Mama Grizzly and the polar bears.

Authors:  Howy Jacobs
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  Climate change: The prospects for polar bears.

Authors:  Andrew E Derocher
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Ancient DNA reveals that bowhead whale lineages survived Late Pleistocene climate change and habitat shifts.

Authors:  Andrew D Foote; Kristin Kaschner; Sebastian E Schultze; Cristina Garilao; Simon Y W Ho; Klaas Post; Thomas F G Higham; Catherine Stokowska; Henry van der Es; Clare B Embling; Kristian Gregersen; Friederike Johansson; Eske Willerslev; M Thomas P Gilbert
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Projected polar bear sea ice habitat in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago.

Authors:  Stephen G Hamilton; Laura Castro de la Guardia; Andrew E Derocher; Vicki Sahanatien; Bruno Tremblay; David Huard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Implications of the circumpolar genetic structure of polar bears for their conservation in a rapidly warming Arctic.

Authors:  Elizabeth Peacock; Sarah A Sonsthagen; Martyn E Obbard; Andrei Boltunov; Eric V Regehr; Nikita Ovsyanikov; Jon Aars; Stephen N Atkinson; George K Sage; Andrew G Hope; Eve Zeyl; Lutz Bachmann; Dorothee Ehrich; Kim T Scribner; Steven C Amstrup; Stanislav Belikov; Erik W Born; Andrew E Derocher; Ian Stirling; Mitchell K Taylor; Øystein Wiig; David Paetkau; Sandra L Talbot
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Rapid Environmental Change Drives Increased Land Use by an Arctic Marine Predator.

Authors:  Todd C Atwood; Elizabeth Peacock; Melissa A McKinney; Kate Lillie; Ryan Wilson; David C Douglas; Susanne Miller; Pat Terletzky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Arctic marine mammal population status, sea ice habitat loss, and conservation recommendations for the 21st century.

Authors:  Kristin L Laidre; Harry Stern; Kit M Kovacs; Lloyd Lowry; Sue E Moore; Eric V Regehr; Steven H Ferguson; Øystein Wiig; Peter Boveng; Robyn P Angliss; Erik W Born; Dennis Litovka; Lori Quakenbush; Christian Lydersen; Dag Vongraven; Fernando Ugarte
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 6.560

8.  Global change-driven use of onshore habitat impacts polar bear faecal microbiota.

Authors:  Sophie E Watson; Heidi C Hauffe; Matthew J Bull; Todd C Atwood; Melissa A McKinney; Massimo Pindo; Sarah E Perkins
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 10.302

9.  Pacific Walrus and climate change: observations and predictions.

Authors:  James G Maccracken
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-07-22       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Demographic and traditional knowledge perspectives on the current status of Canadian polar bear subpopulations.

Authors:  Jordan York; Martha Dowsley; Adam Cornwell; Miroslaw Kuc; Mitchell Taylor
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.