Literature DB >> 21164201

Adaptations of the in vitro MN assay for the genotoxicity assessment of nanomaterials.

L Gonzalez1, B J S Sanderson, M Kirsch-Volders.   

Abstract

The issue of appropriate testing strategies has been raised for the genotoxicity assessment of nanomaterials. Recently, efforts have been made to evaluate the adequacy of Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development-standardised tests to assess the genotoxicity of nanomaterials. The aim of this review was to examine whether the current guideline for the in vitro micronucleus (MN) assay is applicable for testing nanomaterials. From a Pubmed literature search, 21 available studies were identified for analysis. We reviewed all protocols used for testing nanomaterials with the in vitro MN assay. All studies were categorised based on the particle type and size. Different aspects of the protocols were evaluated such as the exposure (duration and doses), the cytochalasin-B treatment, serum levels and cytotoxicity assessment. Sixteen of the 21 studies demonstrated increased frequencies of MN. Some recommendations regarding the protocol were formulated to maximise sensitivity and avoid false negatives. Determination of the cellular dose was advised for a better interpretation of MN frequency results. The level of serum can modulate the cellular response, therefore the serum percentage used should enable cell growth and proliferation and a maximal sensitivity of the assay. Furthermore, different types of cytochalasin-B treatment were used, co-treatment, post-treatment and delayed co-treatment. In order to avoid decreased cellular uptake as a consequence of actin inhibition, post-treatment or delayed co-treatment is suggested. Exposure during mitosis should be recommended to allow contact with the chromatin or mitotic apparatus for nanomaterials that are unable to cross the nuclear membrane. With these adaptations, the in vitro MN assay can be recommended for genotoxicity testing of nanomaterials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21164201     DOI: 10.1093/mutage/geq088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutagenesis        ISSN: 0267-8357            Impact factor:   3.000


  17 in total

1.  Hazard Assessment of Benchmark Metal-Based Nanomaterials Through a Set of In Vitro Genotoxicity Assays.

Authors:  Maria Dušinská; Maria João Silva; Nádia Vital; Mariana Pinhão; Naouale El Yamani; Elise Rundén-Pran; Henriqueta Louro
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 3.650

Review 2.  Emerging metrology for high-throughput nanomaterial genotoxicology.

Authors:  Bryant C Nelson; Christa W Wright; Yuko Ibuki; Maria Moreno-Villanueva; Hanna L Karlsson; Giel Hendriks; Christopher M Sims; Neenu Singh; Shareen H Doak
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 3.000

3.  In Vivo toxicological assessment of biologically synthesized silver nanoparticles in adult Zebrafish (Danio rerio).

Authors:  Chandran Krishnaraj; Stacey L Harper; Soon-Il Yun
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 10.588

4.  Bucky Tubes Induce Oxidative Stress Mediated Cell Death in Human Lung Cells.

Authors:  Jaya Singhal; Surinder P Singh; Stalin Karuppiah; Alok K Pandey
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  In vitro genotoxicity testing strategy for nanomaterials and the adaptation of current OECD guidelines.

Authors:  S H Doak; B Manshian; G J S Jenkins; N Singh
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 2.433

6.  Genotoxicity of TiO2 nanoparticles assessed by mini-gel comet assay and micronucleus scoring with flow cytometry.

Authors:  Sebastiano Di Bucchianico; Francesca Cappellini; Florane Le Bihanic; Yuning Zhang; Kristian Dreij; Hanna L Karlsson
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 3.000

7.  Appropriate in vitro methods for genotoxicity testing of silver nanoparticles.

Authors:  Ha Ryong Kim; Yong Joo Park; Da Young Shin; Seung Min Oh; Kyu Hyuck Chung
Journal:  Environ Health Toxicol       Date:  2013-02-07

8.  Poorly soluble cobalt oxide particles trigger genotoxicity via multiple pathways.

Authors:  Chiara Uboldi; Thierry Orsière; Carine Darolles; Valérie Aloin; Virginie Tassistro; Isabelle George; Véronique Malard
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 9.400

9.  The use of the comet assay for the evaluation of the genotoxicity of nanomaterials.

Authors:  Amaya Azqueta; Maria Dusinska
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 4.599

10.  Genetic toxicity assessment of engineered nanoparticles using a 3D in vitro skin model (EpiDerm™).

Authors:  John W Wills; Nicole Hondow; Adam D Thomas; Katherine E Chapman; David Fish; Thierry G Maffeis; Mark W Penny; Richard A Brown; Gareth J S Jenkins; Andy P Brown; Paul A White; Shareen H Doak
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 9.400

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.