Literature DB >> 21164195

Flow cytometric scoring of micronucleated erythrocytes: an efficient platform for assessing in vivo cytogenetic damage.

Stephen D Dertinger1, Dorothea K Torous, Makoto Hayashi, James T MacGregor.   

Abstract

The relative simplicity of the micronucleated erythrocyte endpoint has made it amenable to automated scoring approaches. Flow cytometry is one such scoring platform that has been employed successfully. This review describes the evolution and properties of flow cytometry-based scoring of micronucleated erythrocytes. The methodology has become widely applied to rodent blood specimens and the high throughput nature of the technology provides a number of advantages over manual microscopic scoring. For instance, the ability to efficiently survey many dose levels and many more cells per specimen relative to microscopy benefits studies that are designed to identify no observable effect levels or lowest observable effect levels. Furthermore, flow cytometry makes it practical to study species with low spontaneous reticulocyte (RET) counts and micronucleus (MN) frequencies, thereby facilitating integration of blood-based micronucleated reticulocyte (MN-RET) frequency measurements into experiments conducted across species of toxicological interest. This capability enhances genotoxicity assessments that have historically been made in dedicated MN tests performed in one species. Importantly, the feasibility of using MN-RET frequencies in blood from humans as an index of genetic damage in bone marrow opens a critical area of application that had not been practical previously. We conclude with recommendations for additional work that is needed to more fully realise the potential of flow cytometric in vivo MN scoring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21164195     DOI: 10.1093/mutage/geq055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutagenesis        ISSN: 0267-8357            Impact factor:   3.000


  8 in total

1.  Analysis of Biomarkers of DNA Damage and Mutagenicity in Mice Exposed to Acrylonitrile.

Authors:  Vernon E Walker; Dale M Walker; Burhan I Ghanayem; George R Douglas
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2020-06-28       Impact factor: 3.739

2.  Differences in micronucleus frequency and acrylamide adduct levels with hemoglobin between vegetarians and non-vegetarians.

Authors:  Natalia Kotova; Cecilia Frostne; Lilianne Abramsson-Zetterberg; Eden Tareke; Rolf Bergman; Siamak Haghdoost; Birgit Paulsson; Margareta Törnqvist; Dan Segerbäck; Dag Jenssen; Jan Grawé
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2014-11-16       Impact factor: 5.614

3.  Sidestream tobacco smoke is a male germ cell mutagen.

Authors:  Francesco Marchetti; Andrea Rowan-Carroll; Andrew Williams; Aris Polyzos; M Lynn Berndt-Weis; Carole L Yauk
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Genetic toxicology in silico protocol.

Authors:  Catrin Hasselgren; Ernst Ahlberg; Yumi Akahori; Alexander Amberg; Lennart T Anger; Franck Atienzar; Scott Auerbach; Lisa Beilke; Phillip Bellion; Romualdo Benigni; Joel Bercu; Ewan D Booth; Dave Bower; Alessandro Brigo; Zoryana Cammerer; Mark T D Cronin; Ian Crooks; Kevin P Cross; Laura Custer; Krista Dobo; Tatyana Doktorova; David Faulkner; Kevin A Ford; Marie C Fortin; Markus Frericks; Samantha E Gad-McDonald; Nichola Gellatly; Helga Gerets; Véronique Gervais; Susanne Glowienke; Jacky Van Gompel; James S Harvey; Jedd Hillegass; Masamitsu Honma; Jui-Hua Hsieh; Chia-Wen Hsu; Tara S Barton-Maclaren; Candice Johnson; Robert Jolly; David Jones; Ray Kemper; Michelle O Kenyon; Naomi L Kruhlak; Sunil A Kulkarni; Klaus Kümmerer; Penny Leavitt; Scott Masten; Scott Miller; Chandrika Moudgal; Wolfgang Muster; Alexandre Paulino; Elena Lo Piparo; Mark Powley; Donald P Quigley; M Vijayaray Reddy; Andrea-Nicole Richarz; Benoit Schilter; Ronald D Snyder; Lidiya Stavitskaya; Reinhard Stidl; David T Szabo; Andrew Teasdale; Raymond R Tice; Alejandra Trejo-Martin; Anna Vuorinen; Brian A Wall; Pete Watts; Angela T White; Joerg Wichard; Kristine L Witt; Adam Woolley; David Woolley; Craig Zwickl; Glenn J Myatt
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 3.271

Review 5.  Comparison of methods used for evaluation of mutagenicity/genotoxicity of model chemicals - parabens.

Authors:  J Chrz; B Hošíková; L Svobodová; D Očadlíková; H Kolářová; M Dvořáková; K Kejlová; L Malina; G Jírová; A Vlková; M Mannerström
Journal:  Physiol Res       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 1.881

6.  A high-throughput in vivo micronucleus assay for genome instability screening in mice.

Authors:  Gabriel Balmus; Natasha A Karp; Bee Ling Ng; Stephen P Jackson; David J Adams; Rebecca E McIntyre
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 7.  The micronucleus test-most widely used in vivo genotoxicity test.

Authors:  Makoto Hayashi
Journal:  Genes Environ       Date:  2016-10-01

8.  A Signature of Genomic Instability Resulting from Deficient Replication Licensing.

Authors:  Steven C Pruitt; Maochun Qin; Jianmin Wang; Dimiter Kunnev; Amy Freeland
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 5.917

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.