Literature DB >> 21163913

Auditory-olfactory integration: congruent or pleasant sounds amplify odor pleasantness.

Han-Seok Seo1, Thomas Hummel.   

Abstract

Even though we often perceive odors while hearing auditory stimuli, surprisingly little is known about auditory-olfactory integration. This study aimed to investigate the influence of auditory cues on ratings of odor intensity and/or pleasantness, with a focus on 2 factors: "congruency" (Experiment 1) and the "halo/horns effect" of auditory pleasantness (Experiment 2). First, in Experiment 1, participants were presented with congruent, incongruent, or neutral sounds before and during the presentation of odor. Participants rated the odors as being more pleasant while listening to a congruent sound than while listening to an incongruent sound. In Experiment 2, participants received pleasant or unpleasant sounds before and during the presentation of either a pleasant or unpleasant odor. The hedonic valence of the sounds transferred to the odors, irrespective of the hedonic tone of the odor itself. The more the participants liked the preceding sound, the more pleasant the subsequent odor became. In contrast, the ratings of odor intensity appeared to be little or not at all influenced by the congruency or hedonic valence of the auditory cue. In conclusion, the present study for the first time provides an empirical demonstration that auditory cues can modulate odor pleasantness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21163913     DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjq129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  17 in total

1.  Influence of background noise on the performance in the odor sensitivity task: effects of noise type and extraversion.

Authors:  Han-Seok Seo; Antje Hähner; Volker Gudziol; Mandy Scheibe; Thomas Hummel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-02       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Crossmodal correspondences between odors and contingent features: odors, musical notes, and geometrical shapes.

Authors:  Ophelia Deroy; Anne-Sylvie Crisinel; Charles Spence
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-10

Review 3.  Why we are not all synesthetes (not even weakly so).

Authors:  Ophelia Deroy; Charles Spence
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-08

4.  Background sound modulates the performance of odor discrimination task.

Authors:  Han-Seok Seo; Volker Gudziol; Antje Hähner; Thomas Hummel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-21       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Individual recognition through olfactory-auditory matching in lemurs.

Authors:  Ipek G Kulahci; Christine M Drea; Daniel I Rubenstein; Asif A Ghazanfar
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Cross-modal integration of emotions in the chemical senses.

Authors:  Moustafa Bensafi; Emilia Iannilli; Valentin A Schriever; Johan Poncelet; Han-Seok Seo; Johannes Gerber; Catherine Rouby; Thomas Hummel
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Crossmodal effect of music and odor pleasantness on olfactory quality perception.

Authors:  Carlos Velasco; Diana Balboa; Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos; Charles Spence
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-11-28

8.  Assessing the Effect of Musical Congruency on Wine Tasting in a Live Performance Setting.

Authors:  Qian Janice Wang; Charles Spence
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2015-07-30

9.  Reduced pleasant touch appraisal in the presence of a disgusting odor.

Authors:  Ilona Croy; Silvia D' Angelo; Håkan Olausson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Multisensory integration mechanisms during aging.

Authors:  Jessica Freiherr; Johan N Lundström; Ute Habel; Kathrin Reetz
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.