Literature DB >> 22941357

Influence of background noise on the performance in the odor sensitivity task: effects of noise type and extraversion.

Han-Seok Seo1, Antje Hähner, Volker Gudziol, Mandy Scheibe, Thomas Hummel.   

Abstract

Recent research demonstrated that background noise relative to silence impaired subjects' performance in a cognitively driven odor discrimination test. The current study aimed to investigate whether the background noise can also modulate performance in an odor sensitivity task that is less cognitively loaded. Previous studies have shown that the effect of background noise on task performance can be different in relation to degree of extraversion and/or type of noise. Accordingly, we wanted to examine whether the influence of background noise on the odor sensitivity task can be altered as a function of the type of background noise (i.e., nonverbal vs. verbal noise) and the degree of extraversion (i.e., introvert vs. extrovert group). Subjects were asked to conduct an odor sensitivity task in the presence of either nonverbal noise (e.g., party sound) or verbal noise (e.g., audio book), or silence. Overall, the subjects' mean performance in the odor sensitivity task was not significantly different across three auditory conditions. However, with regard to the odor sensitivity task, a significant interaction emerged between the type of background noise and the degree of extraversion. Specifically, verbal noise relative to silence significantly impaired or improved the performance of the odor sensitivity task in the introvert or extrovert group, respectively; the differential effect of introversion/extraversion was not observed in the nonverbal noise-induced task performance. In conclusion, our findings provide new empirical evidence that type of background noise and degree of extraversion play an important role in modulating the effect of background noise on subjects' performance in an odor sensitivity task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22941357     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3222-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  35 in total

1.  Event-related brain potentials to attended and ignored olfactory and trigeminal stimuli.

Authors:  M W Geisler; C Murphy
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.997

Review 2.  Crossmodal processing in the human brain: insights from functional neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  G A Calvert
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Flavor processing: more than the sum of its parts.

Authors:  D M Small; M Jones-Gotman; R J Zatorre; M Petrides; A C Evans
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1997-12-22       Impact factor: 1.837

4.  Cognitive factors in odor detection, odor discrimination, and odor identification tasks.

Authors:  Margareta Hedner; Maria Larsson; Nancy Arnold; Gesualdo M Zucco; Thomas Hummel
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 2.475

5.  Acute effects of noise exposure: an experimental investigation of the effects of noise and task parameters on cognitive vigilance tasks.

Authors:  A P Smith
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.015

6.  fMRI of emotional responses to odors: influence of hedonic valence and judgment, handedness, and gender.

Authors:  Jean-P Royet; Jane Plailly; Chantal Delon-Martin; David A Kareken; Christoph Segebarth
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  The tuning fork--an essential instrument in otologic practice.

Authors:  P J Doyle; D W Anderson; S Pijl
Journal:  J Otolaryngol       Date:  1984-04

8.  Attention to odor modulates thalamocortical connectivity in the human brain.

Authors:  Jane Plailly; James D Howard; Darren R Gitelman; Jay A Gottfried
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Influences of olfactory impairment on depression, cognitive performance, and quality of life in Korean elderly.

Authors:  Han-Seok Seo; Kwang Jin Jeon; Thomas Hummel; Byung-Chan Min
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Cross-modal deactivations during modality-specific selective attention.

Authors:  Jennifer L Mozolic; David Joyner; Christina E Hugenschmidt; Ann M Peiffer; Robert A Kraft; Joseph A Maldjian; Paul J Laurienti
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 2.474

View more
  4 in total

1.  Contribution of ambient noise and hyperbaric atmosphere to olfactory and gustatory function.

Authors:  Hans-Georg Fischer; Christopher Schmidtbauer; Annett Seiffart; Michael Bucher; Stefan K Plontke; Torsten Rahne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Should Panelists Refrain from Wearing a Personal Fragrance Prior to Sensory Evaluation? The Effect of Using Perfume on Olfactory Performance.

Authors:  Thadeus L Beekman; Kaushik Luthra; Shady Afrin Jeesan; Rebecca Bowie; Han-Seok Seo
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-02-01

3.  An investigation of cognitive test performance across conditions of silence, background noise and music as a function of neuroticism.

Authors:  James Reynolds; Alastair McClelland; Adrian Furnham
Journal:  Anxiety Stress Coping       Date:  2013-12-10

4.  Does ambient noise or hypobaric atmosphere influence olfactory and gustatory function?

Authors:  Torsten Rahne; Robert Köppke; Michael Nehring; Stefan K Plontke; Hans-Georg Fischer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.