OBJECTIVE: This report surveys and evaluates the scientific research on evidence-based healthcare design and extracts its implications for designing better and safer hospitals. BACKGROUND: It builds on a literature review conducted by researchers in 2004. METHODS: Research teams conducted a new and more exhaustive search for rigorous empirical studies that link the design of hospital physical environments with healthcare outcomes. The review followed a two-step process, including an extensive search for existing literature and a screening of each identified study for the relevance and quality of evidence. RESULTS: This review found a growing body of rigorous studies to guide healthcare design, especially with respect to reducing the frequency of hospital-acquired infections. Results are organized according to three general types of outcomes: patient safety, other patient outcomes, and staff outcomes. The findings further support the importance of improving outcomes for a range of design characteristics or interventions, including single-bed rooms rather than multibed rooms, effective ventilation systems, a good acoustic environment, nature distractions and daylight, appropriate lighting, better ergonomic design, acuity-adaptable rooms, and improved floor layouts and work settings. Directions for future research are also identified. CONCLUSIONS: The state of knowledge of evidence-based healthcare design has grown rapidly in recent years. The evidence indicates that well-designed physical settings play an important role in making hospitals safer and more healing for patients, and better places for staff to work.
OBJECTIVE: This report surveys and evaluates the scientific research on evidence-based healthcare design and extracts its implications for designing better and safer hospitals. BACKGROUND: It builds on a literature review conducted by researchers in 2004. METHODS: Research teams conducted a new and more exhaustive search for rigorous empirical studies that link the design of hospital physical environments with healthcare outcomes. The review followed a two-step process, including an extensive search for existing literature and a screening of each identified study for the relevance and quality of evidence. RESULTS: This review found a growing body of rigorous studies to guide healthcare design, especially with respect to reducing the frequency of hospital-acquired infections. Results are organized according to three general types of outcomes: patient safety, other patient outcomes, and staff outcomes. The findings further support the importance of improving outcomes for a range of design characteristics or interventions, including single-bed rooms rather than multibed rooms, effective ventilation systems, a good acoustic environment, nature distractions and daylight, appropriate lighting, better ergonomic design, acuity-adaptable rooms, and improved floor layouts and work settings. Directions for future research are also identified. CONCLUSIONS: The state of knowledge of evidence-based healthcare design has grown rapidly in recent years. The evidence indicates that well-designed physical settings play an important role in making hospitals safer and more healing for patients, and better places for staff to work.
Authors: Rose Gunn; Melinda M Davis; Jennifer Hall; John Heintzman; John Muench; Brianna Smeds; Benjamin F Miller; William L Miller; Emma Gilchrist; Shandra Brown Levey; Jacqueline Brown; Pam Wise Romero; Deborah J Cohen Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2015 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Edward A Vessel; Ayse Ilkay Isik; Amy M Belfi; Jonathan L Stahl; G Gabrielle Starr Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2019-09-04 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Paula Gómez-Vela; Margarita Pérez-Ruiz; María Fátima Hernández Martín; Javier Román; Eneko Larumbe-Zabala Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-09-03 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Irene J Zaal; Carolina F Spruyt; Linda M Peelen; Maarten M J van Eijk; Rens Wientjes; Margriet M E Schneider; Jozef Kesecioglu; Arjen J C Slooter Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2012-10-24 Impact factor: 17.440