BACKGROUND/AIMS: In hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration patients, the plasma sodium (PNa) measured before dialysis can be regarded as the sodium setpoint. By the end of dialysis, the PNa typically approximates the prescribed dialysate sodium (DNa), the difference between DNa and PNa being considered the sodium gradient. We determined the relationship between setpoint, gradient and pre- to postdialysis PNa change (delta PNa), and studied associations with dialysis-related variables. METHODS: Cohort study. Measurements from 132 patients during 12 consecutive treatments included PNa and DNa concentrations, pre- to postdialysis body weight and predialysis systolic blood pressure. RESULTS: Sodium setpoints were normally distributed (137.9 ± 2.4 mmol/l), DNa prescriptions were non-normally distributed (138.9 ± 1.8 mmol/l). The sodium gradient correlated strongly with delta PNa (r = 0.76, p < 0.001). Both sodium gradient and delta PNa correlated with relative interdialytic weight gain (IDWG; r = 0.25, p = 0.004, and r = 0.44, p < 0.001, respectively), but not with predialysis systolic blood pressure. These correlations were consistent after exclusion of patients with urine volume >500 ml/day and patients undergoing sodium profiling, and increased after exclusion of patients with hemodiafiltration protocols. Predictors for having higher relative IDWG (≥2.8%) were delta PNa concentrations ≥0 mmol/l and younger age. Predictors for having a delta PNa concentration ≥0 mmol/l were lower sodium setpoints, higher DNa prescriptions, use of Nikkiso machines, sodium profiling and younger age. Patients with positive delta PNa despite negative gradients were significantly younger, used more Nikkiso machines and presented with higher IDWG. CONCLUSION: IDWG correlated with the sodium gradient and more strongly with delta PNa, suggesting the need for studying other outcomes, such as morbidity and mortality.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: In hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration patients, the plasma sodium (PNa) measured before dialysis can be regarded as the sodium setpoint. By the end of dialysis, the PNa typically approximates the prescribed dialysate sodium (DNa), the difference between DNa and PNa being considered the sodium gradient. We determined the relationship between setpoint, gradient and pre- to postdialysis PNa change (delta PNa), and studied associations with dialysis-related variables. METHODS: Cohort study. Measurements from 132 patients during 12 consecutive treatments included PNa and DNa concentrations, pre- to postdialysis body weight and predialysis systolic blood pressure. RESULTS:Sodium setpoints were normally distributed (137.9 ± 2.4 mmol/l), DNa prescriptions were non-normally distributed (138.9 ± 1.8 mmol/l). The sodium gradient correlated strongly with delta PNa (r = 0.76, p < 0.001). Both sodium gradient and delta PNa correlated with relative interdialytic weight gain (IDWG; r = 0.25, p = 0.004, and r = 0.44, p < 0.001, respectively), but not with predialysis systolic blood pressure. These correlations were consistent after exclusion of patients with urine volume >500 ml/day and patients undergoing sodium profiling, and increased after exclusion of patients with hemodiafiltration protocols. Predictors for having higher relative IDWG (≥2.8%) were delta PNa concentrations ≥0 mmol/l and younger age. Predictors for having a delta PNa concentration ≥0 mmol/l were lower sodium setpoints, higher DNa prescriptions, use of Nikkiso machines, sodium profiling and younger age. Patients with positive delta PNa despite negative gradients were significantly younger, used more Nikkiso machines and presented with higher IDWG. CONCLUSION: IDWG correlated with the sodium gradient and more strongly with delta PNa, suggesting the need for studying other outcomes, such as morbidity and mortality.
Authors: Manfred Hecking; Angelo Karaboyas; Rajiv Saran; Ananda Sen; Masaaki Inaba; Hugh Rayner; Walter H Hörl; Ronald L Pisoni; Bruce M Robinson; Gere Sunder-Plassmann; Friedrich K Port Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2011-11-03 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Manfred Hecking; Marlies Antlanger; Wolfgang Winnicki; Thomas Reiter; Johannes Werzowa; Michael Haidinger; Thomas Weichhart; Hans-Dietrich Polaschegg; Peter Josten; Isabella Exner; Katharina Lorenz-Turnheim; Manfred Eigner; Gernot Paul; Renate Klauser-Braun; Walter H Hörl; Gere Sunder-Plassmann; Marcus D Säemann Journal: Trials Date: 2012-06-08 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Joanna Leigh Dunlop; Alain Charles Vandal; Janak Rashme de Zoysa; Ruvin Sampath Gabriel; Imad Adbi Haloob; Christopher John Hood; Philip James Matheson; David Owen Ross McGregor; Kannaiyan Samuel Rabindranath; David John Semple; Mark Roger Marshall Journal: BMC Nephrol Date: 2013-07-15 Impact factor: 2.388
Authors: Andrea Tura; Stefano Sbrignadello; Emanuele Mambelli; Paolo Ravazzani; Antonio Santoro; Giovanni Pacini Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-07-02 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jochen G Raimann; Linda H Ficociello; Len A Usvyat; Hanjie Zhang; Lisa Pacelli; Sandi Moore; Penny Sheppard; Qingqing Xiao; Yuedong Wang; Claudy Mullon; Paul Balter; Terry Sullivan; Peter Kotanko Journal: BMC Nephrol Date: 2018-04-02 Impact factor: 2.388