| Literature DB >> 21159571 |
Ying-Cun Li1, Yu-Hua Deng, Zhen-Hua Guo, Ming-Man Zhang, Jin Zhu, Chon-Lun Pu, Chun-Ping Xiang, Chun-Bao Guo.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Activation of hedgehog (Hh) pathway has been implicated in the development of human malignancies. Hh as well as related downstream target genes has been extensively studied in many kinds of malignant tumours for clinical diagnostic or prognostic utilities. This study aimed at investigating whether Hh molecules provides a molecular marker of hepatoblastoma malignancy.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 21159571 PMCID: PMC3352655 DOI: 10.1186/2047-783x-15-11-468
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Med Res ISSN: 0949-2321 Impact factor: 2.175
Figure 1A representative series of immunohistochemical staining of Hh signaling components from hepatoblastoma patients. (A) Immunohistochemistry for CK-7 expression (expected deeply-brown) in liver sections from a child with BA demonstrating the expression of Shh was present in the cytoplasm of epithelium and stroma tissues. (B) Patched and (C) Smo expression was observed in cytoplasm and cell membrane of tumors. (D) Gli1 expression was scattered found in nuclear of hepatoblastoma cells.
Hh pathway components staining status in hepatoblastoma, cholestasis tissues and control
| Variables | hepato-blastoma | cholestasis | Control | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ( | |||
| Shh | |||||
| (+) | 28 | 7 | 0.040 | 3 | 0.008 |
| (-) | 4 | 5 | 5 | ||
| Gli-1 | |||||
| (+) | 22 | 6 | 0.143 | 2 | 0.032 |
| (-) | 10 | 6 | 6 | ||
| Smo | |||||
| (+) | 21 | 7 | 0.245 | 2 | 0.041 |
| (-) | 11 | 5 | 6 | ||
| Ptc | |||||
| (+) | 26 | 8 | 0.181 | 4 | 0.075 |
| (-) | 6 | 4 | 4 |
Association between Shh, Gli1 and Gli-1 staining and pathological characteristics of hepatoblastoma patients (Pearson's χ2 test)
| Prognostic factors | Shh(+) | Smo(+) | Gli-1(+) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n(%) | n(%) | n(%) | ||||
| Age(y)(n) | ||||||
| 0-2 years(15) | 13 | 0.554 | 10 | 0.508 | 10 | 0.571 |
| 2-5 years (12) | 11 | 8 | 9 | |||
| over 5 years (5) | 4 | 3 | 3 | |||
| Gender | ||||||
| Female (10) | 9 | 0.704 | 5 | 0.148 | 7 | 0.625 |
| Male (21) | 19 | 16 | 15 | |||
| Histology | ||||||
| Well (17) | 13 | 0.07 | 9 | 0.108 | 9 | 0.046 |
| Poorly (15) | 15 | 12 | 13 | |||
| Tumor size | ||||||
| n ≤ 2 (3) | 2 | 0.056 | 1 | 0.070 | 1 | 0.030 |
| 2 < n ≤ 5 (14) | 11 | 8 | 8 | |||
| 5 < n (15) | 15 | 12 | 13 | |||
| Stage | ||||||
| Stages I, II (8) | 5 | 0.078 | 2 | 0.010 | 1 | 0.000 |
| StagesIII, IV (24) | 23 | 19 | 21 | |||
| Preoperative chemotherapy | ||||||
| Yes(17) | 14 | 0.350 | 8 | 0.022 | 9 | 0.046 |
| No (15) | 14 | 13 | 13 | |||
| Prognosis | ||||||
| Survived with evidence-free (19) | 15 | 0.108 | 8 | 0.022 | 10 | 0.020 |
| Recurrence/died of disease (13) | 13 | 13 | 12 |
Figure 2Kaplan-Meier curves for overall survival of the patient population with hepatoblastoma. A, Overall survival according to Gli1 status. patients with nuclear Gli1 (+) showed poorer survival rates than those with tumors expressing Gli1 (-) (P < 0.01, log-rank test). B, Survival according to the levels of Smo expression. Patients with Smo (+) pattern showed poorer outcome than the remainder of the population (P < 0.01).
Univariate and Multivariate analysis of potential molecular markers for overall survival of hepatoblastoma
| Univariate | P | Multivariate HR (95%CI)* | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preoperative chemotherapy | ||||
| (yes versus no) | 1.36(0.89-3.79) | 0.046 | 2.16(0.91-5.11) | 0.074 |
| surgical resection | ||||
| (yes versus no) | 1.81(0.92-3.62) | 0.082 | 2.13(1.17-4.43) | 0.033 |
| Gli1 expression | ||||
| (positive versus negative) | 4.75(1.16-15.61) | 0.011 | 6.34(1.35-18.86) | 0.007 |
| Patched expression | ||||
| (positive versus negative) | 2.53(0.81-5.86) | 0.161 | 3.12(0.93-6.45) | 0.084 |
* Adjusted for tumor grade, histologic type, and stage classification