Literature DB >> 21159406

Data archiving in ecology and evolution: best practices.

Michael C Whitlock1.   

Abstract

Many ecology and evolution journals have recently adopted policies requiring that data from their papers be publicly archived. I present suggestions on how data generators, data re-users, and journals can maximize the fairness and scientific value of data archiving. Data should be archived with enough clarity and supporting information that they can be accurately interpreted by others. Re-users should respect their intellectual debt to the originators of data through citation both of the paper and of the data package. In addition, journals should consider requiring that all data for published papers be archived, just as DNA sequences must be deposited in GenBank. Data are another valuable part of the legacy of a scientific career and archiving them can lead to new scientific insights. Archiving also increases opportunities for credit to be given to the scientists who originally collected the data.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21159406     DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2010.11.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  36 in total

1.  EMBL2checklists: A Python package to facilitate the user-friendly submission of plant and fungal DNA barcoding sequences to ENA.

Authors:  Michael Gruenstaeudl; Yannick Hartmaring
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Public availability of research data in dentistry journals indexed in Journal Citation Reports.

Authors:  Antonio Vidal-Infer; Beatriz Tarazona; Adolfo Alonso-Arroyo; Rafael Aleixandre-Benavent
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-03-26       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Continent-wide effects of urbanization on bird and mammal genetic diversity.

Authors:  C Schmidt; M Domaratzki; R P Kinnunen; J Bowman; C J Garroway
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Opportunities and challenges of macrogenetic studies.

Authors:  Deborah M Leigh; Charles B van Rees; Katie L Millette; Martin F Breed; Chloé Schmidt; Laura D Bertola; Brian K Hand; Margaret E Hunter; Evelyn L Jensen; Francine Kershaw; Libby Liggins; Gordon Luikart; Stéphanie Manel; Joachim Mergeay; Joshua M Miller; Gernot Segelbacher; Sean Hoban; Ivan Paz-Vinas
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  Data rescue: saving environmental data from extinction.

Authors:  Ellen K Bledsoe; Joseph B Burant; Gracielle T Higino; Dominique G Roche; Sandra A Binning; Kerri Finlay; Jason Pither; Laura S Pollock; Jennifer M Sunday; Diane S Srivastava
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 5.530

6.  What should be the data sharing policy of cognitive science?

Authors:  Mark A Pitt; Yun Tang
Journal:  Top Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-01

Review 7.  Overview of FEED, the feeding experiments end-user database.

Authors:  Christine E Wall; Christopher J Vinyard; Susan H Williams; Vladimir Gapeyev; Xianhua Liu; Hilmar Lapp; Rebecca Z German
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 3.326

8.  Data issues in the life sciences.

Authors:  Anne E Thessen; David J Patterson
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 1.546

Review 9.  The promises and challenges of archiving insect behavior and natural history in a changing world.

Authors:  Michael J Sheehan; Sara E Miller
Journal:  Curr Opin Insect Sci       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 5.254

10.  Sharing and re-use of phylogenetic trees (and associated data) to facilitate synthesis.

Authors:  Arlin Stoltzfus; Brian O'Meara; Jamie Whitacre; Ross Mounce; Emily L Gillespie; Sudhir Kumar; Dan F Rosauer; Rutger A Vos
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2012-10-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.