Literature DB >> 21158295

Verification of patient-specific dose distributions in proton therapy using a commercial two-dimensional ion chamber array.

Bijan Arjomandy1, Narayan Sahoo, George Ciangaru, Ronald Zhu, Xiaofei Song, Michael Gillin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether a two-dimensional (2D) ion chamber array detector quickly and accurately measures patient-specific dose distributions in treatment with passively scattered and spot scanning proton beams.
METHODS: The 2D ion chamber array detector MatriXX was used to measure the dose distributions in plastic water phantom from passively scattered and spot scanning proton beam fields planned for patient treatment. Planar dose distributions were measured using MatriXX, and the distributions were compared to those calculated using a treatment-planning system. The dose distributions generated by the treatment-planning system and a film dosimetry system were similarly compared.
RESULTS: For passively scattered proton beams, the gamma index for the dose-distribution comparison for treatment fields for three patients with prostate cancer and for one patient with lung cancer was less than 1.0 for 99% and 100% of pixels for a 3% dose tolerance and 3 mm distance-to-dose agreement, respectively. For spot scanning beams, the mean (+/- standard deviation) percentages of pixels with gamma indices meeting the passing criteria were 97.1% +/- 1.4% and 98.8% +/- 1.4% for MatriXX and film dosimetry, respectively, for 20 fields used to treat patients with prostate cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: Unlike film dosimetry, MatriXX provides not only 2D dose-distribution information but also absolute dosimetry in fractions of minutes with acceptable accuracy. The results of this study indicate that MatriXX can be used to verify patient-field specific dose distributions in proton therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21158295     DOI: 10.1118/1.3505011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  13 in total

1.  Quenching correction for volumetric scintillation dosimetry of proton beams.

Authors:  Daniel Robertson; Dragan Mirkovic; Narayan Sahoo; Sam Beddar
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Statistical assessment of proton treatment plans under setup and range uncertainties.

Authors:  Peter C Park; Joey P Cheung; X Ronald Zhu; Andrew K Lee; Narayan Sahoo; Susan L Tucker; Wei Liu; Heng Li; Radhe Mohan; Laurence E Court; Lei Dong
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  3D reconstruction of scintillation light emission from proton pencil beams using limited viewing angles-a simulation study.

Authors:  CheukKai Hui; Daniel Robertson; Sam Beddar
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Automation of routine elements for spot-scanning proton patient-specific quality assurance.

Authors:  Danairis Hernandez Morales; Jie Shan; Wei Liu; Kurt E Augustine; Martin Bues; Michael J Davis; Mirek Fatyga; Jedediah E Johnson; Daniel W Mundy; Jiajian Shen; James E Younkin; Joshua B Stoker
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Automated Monte-Carlo re-calculation of proton therapy plans using Geant4/Gate: implementation and comparison to plan-specific quality assurance measurements.

Authors:  Adam H Aitkenhead; Peter Sitch; Jenny C Richardson; Carla Winterhalter; Imran Patel; Ranald I Mackay
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Which technique for radiation is most beneficial for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer? Intensity modulated proton therapy versus intensity modulated photon treatment, helical tomotherapy and volumetric arc therapy for primary radiation - an intraindividual comparison.

Authors:  Simone Marnitz; Waldemar Wlodarczyk; Oliver Neumann; Christhardt Koehler; Mirko Weihrauch; Volker Budach; Luca Cozzi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 7.  Towards effective and efficient patient-specific quality assurance for spot scanning proton therapy.

Authors:  X Ronald Zhu; Yupeng Li; Dennis Mackin; Heng Li; Falk Poenisch; Andrew K Lee; Anita Mahajan; Steven J Frank; Michael T Gillin; Narayan Sahoo; Xiaodong Zhang
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  Pencil beam scanning dosimetry for large animal irradiation.

Authors:  Liyong Lin; Timothy D Solberg; Alexandro Carabe; James E Mcdonough; Eric Diffenderfer; Jenine K Sanzari; Ann R Kennedy; Keith Cengel
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 2.724

9.  Use of a novel two-dimensional ionization chamber array for pencil beam scanning proton therapy beam quality assurance.

Authors:  Liyong Lin; Minglei Kang; Timothy D Solberg; Thierry Mertens; Christian Baeumer; Christopher G Ainsley; James E McDonough
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Monte Carlo Calculations Supporting Patient Plan Verification in Proton Therapy.

Authors:  Thiago V M Lima; Manjit Dosanjh; Alfredo Ferrari; Silvia Molineli; Mario Ciocca; Andrea Mairani
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.