Literature DB >> 21155694

Pharmacoeconomics of voriconazole in the management of invasive fungal infections.

Daoud Al-Badriyeh1, Siow Chin Heng, Chin Fen Neoh, Monica Slavin, Kay Stewart, David C M Kong.   

Abstract

The incidence of invasive fungal infection has risen in recent years with the introduction of more intensive chemotherapy regimens and the advent of stem cell and solid-organ transplants. In patients undergoing chemotherapy, mortality rates ranging from 50 to 90% have been associated with documented invasive fungal infection. Voriconazole is a second-generation triazole, which is a synthesized derivative of fluconazole. It was first approved for marketing in the USA in 2002. Voriconazole has excellent bioavailability and is available in oral and intravenous dosage form. It has extended-spectrum antifungal activity whereby it is highly effective against a variety of fungal organisms, including Candida, Fusarium, Paecilomyces and Scedosporium species, but it is especially known for its activity against the Aspergillu s species. Voriconazole has become widely used for three types of treatment strategies (i.e., targeted, empirical and prophylactic). However, voriconazole is a high-cost antifungal agent and, therefore, its effectiveness should be scrutinized, taking into consideration its cost in relation to the costs of other comparable antifungal agents. This article summarizes the 18 identified peer-reviewed publications on the pharmacoeconomics of voriconazole in the English literature, up to March 2010, and provides a view on its future role in therapy. Comparisons with existing antifungals are provided when possible to illustrate the potential role of voriconazole in a clinical setting. The studies took place in a variety of countries and were all retrospective in nature, with the majority suggesting that voriconazole is a more cost-effective option for antifungal treatment. Of the 18 evaluations, 11 were related to the economic impact of voriconazole against invasive aspergillosis only. Economic data to guide the use of voriconazole as prophylaxis or empirical therapy as well as targeted therapy against invasive candidiasis remain limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21155694     DOI: 10.1586/erp.10.69

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res        ISSN: 1473-7167            Impact factor:   2.217


  5 in total

Review 1.  Triazole antifungal agents in invasive fungal infections: a comparative review.

Authors:  Cornelia Lass-Flörl
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  [Innovative antifungals for treatment of invasive fungal infections].

Authors:  A Glöckner
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 0.743

3.  Open-Label Study of Absorption and Clearance of 1% Voriconazole Eye Drops.

Authors:  Chin Fen Neoh; Lok Leung; Elsie Chan; Daoud Al-Badriyeh; Robert O Fullinfaw; Vishal Jhanji; Rasik B Vajpayee; Geoffrey E Davies; Kay Stewart; David C M Kong
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Cutaneous Fusariosis in Unprotected Snake Bite Wound of Farmer's Hand.

Authors:  Eun Taik Son; Hwan Jun Choi; Young Man Lee; Jun Hyuk Kim; Doo Hyun Nam; Hyun Deuk Cho
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2015-03-16

5.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Isavuconazole vs. Voriconazole as First-Line Treatment for Invasive Aspergillosis.

Authors:  Rachel Harrington; Edward Lee; Hongbo Yang; Jin Wei; Andrew Messali; Nkechi Azie; Eric Q Wu; James Spalding
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 3.845

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.