Literature DB >> 21155508

Update on distance and velocity requirements for community ambulation.

A Williams Andrews1, Susan A Chinworth, Michael Bourassa, Miranda Garvin, Dacia Benton, Scott Tanner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were to provide an update to the ambulatory distance requirements for community ambulation and to update gait speed performance and requirements at intersections.
METHODS: Distances were measured at 9 types of sites using a rolling measuring device in accordance with the protocol set forth by Lerner-Frankiel and associates. The 9 types of sites were supermarkets, drug stores, banks, department stores, post offices, medical offices, superstores, club warehouses, and hardware stores. Gait speed allotted by crosswalk signals as well as the gait speeds of individuals through crosswalks were recorded. Qualitative observations of the pedestrians' age (older - 65 years; younger < 65 years) and sex were also noted.
RESULTS: Distances were measured at 141 different establishments. The shortest mean distance requirement was found in the medical offices at 65.82 (32.28) m. Club warehouses had the longest mean distance requirement at 676.82 (159.36) m. The mean gait speed used by the pedestrians (N = 139) was 1.32 (0.31) m/s while the mean speed necessary as set by the crosswalk signals was 0.49 (0.20) m/s. All of the individuals observed were able to cross the street within the allotted time and with adequate speed. The gait speeds met the normative data established for age and sex as well as data reported for slower older adults and some with incomplete spinal cord injury.
CONCLUSIONS: Distance requirements for full community ambulation may need to be increased to 600 m or more. Gait speed requirements at crosswalks in the communities measured are set to accommodate the gait speed capabilities of older pedestrians who attempt crossing at controlled intersections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21155508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Geriatr Phys Ther        ISSN: 1539-8412            Impact factor:   3.381


  30 in total

1.  Highest ambulatory speed using Lokomat gait training for individuals with a motor-complete spinal cord injury: a clinical pilot study.

Authors:  Lysanne van Silfhout; Zdenĕk Váňa; Jakub Pĕtioký; Michael J R Edwards; Ronald H M A Bartels; Henk van de Meent; Allard J F Hosman
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 2.216

2.  Spinal Cord Injury Functional Ambulation Profile: a preliminary look at responsiveness.

Authors:  Kristin E Musselman; Jaynie F Yang
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2013-10-10

3.  Initial Outcomes from a Multicenter Study Utilizing the Indego Powered Exoskeleton in Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Candy Tefertiller; Kaitlin Hays; Janell Jones; Arun Jayaraman; Clare Hartigan; Tamara Bushnik; Gail F Forrest
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2017-11-20

4.  A step activity monitoring program improves real world walking activity post stroke.

Authors:  Kelly A Danks; Margaret A Roos; Dana McCoy; Darcy S Reisman
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 3.033

5.  Association between reliance on devices and people for walking and ability to walk community distances among persons with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Sandra S Brotherton; Lee L Saunders; James S Krause; David C Morrisette
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.985

6.  Associations of Usual Pace and Complex Task Gait Speeds With Incident Mobility Disability.

Authors:  Andrea L Rosso; Andrea L Metti; Kimberly Faulkner; Jennifer S Brach; Stephanie A Studenski; Mark Redfern; Caterina Rosano
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  Walking-related outcomes for individuals with traumatic and non-traumatic spinal cord injury inform physical therapy practice.

Authors:  Andresa R Marinho; Heather M Flett; Catharine Craven; C Andrea Ottensmeyer; Daria Parsons; Molly C Verrier
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.985

8.  Does the intensity of daily walking matter for protecting against the development of a slow gait speed in people with or at high risk of knee osteoarthritis? An observational study.

Authors:  S A M Fenton; T Neogi; D Dunlop; M Nevitt; M Doherty; J L Duda; R Klocke; A Abhishek; A Rushton; W Zhang; C E Lewis; J Torner; G Kitas; D K White
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 6.576

9.  Mobility Outcomes Following Five Training Sessions with a Powered Exoskeleton.

Authors:  Clare Hartigan; Casey Kandilakis; Skyler Dalley; Mike Clausen; Edgar Wilson; Scott Morrison; Steven Etheridge; Ryan Farris
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2015-04-12

10.  Relationship Between Walking Capacity, Biopsychosocial Factors, Self-efficacy, and Walking Activity in Persons Poststroke.

Authors:  Kelly A Danks; Ryan T Pohlig; Margie Roos; Tamara R Wright; Darcy S Reisman
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.649

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.