Literature DB >> 21154748

Frequent genomic loss at chr16p13.2 is associated with poor prognosis in colorectal cancer.

Claus Lindbjerg Andersen1, Philippe Lamy, Kasper Thorsen, Eigil Kjeldsen, Friedrik Wikman, Palle Villesen, Bodil Øster, Søren Laurberg, Torben Falck Ørntoft.   

Abstract

Genomic alterations play important roles in colorectal cancer (CRC) carcinogenesis. Here, we aimed to identify and characterize recurrent copy-number alterations (CNAs) associated with clinical outcome of CRC by the use of single nucleotide polymorphism arrays, genomic quantitative PCR (qPCR) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Colorectal neoplasia specimens and paired germline samples from 144 patients (40 adenomas and 104 carcinomas) as well as 40 CRC cell lines were investigated. This large dataset revealed frequent loss, including homozygous loss, at chr16p13.2 (from 5.9 to 7.42Mb). The loss was observed in 30% of adenomas and even more frequently in carcinomas, 56%, indicating that the loss define a subset of adenomas with a propensity for invasion. Consistent with this, the loss occurred twice as frequent in villous (40%) as in tubular adenomas (20%). The loss occurred independently of microsatellite stability and could be validated by qPCR in an independent sample cohort (n = 71). In Stage II/III, microsatellite stable (MSS) CRC it was associated with poor recurrence free survival (hazard ratio 2.4; p = 0.02; Multivariate Cox regression analysis). No transcriptional consequences of the losses were observed, and the only gene, A2BP1, located in the region showed no mutations. Correlation with other CNAs was established for chr3p22 in carcinomas and chr20p (inverse) in adenomas. FISH documented the chr16p13.2 region to be involved in complex structural rearrangements that included translocation to chr3p22 in some cases. The findings indicate that structural rearrangements involving chr16p13.2 are very frequent in colorectal neoplasia, often lead to homozygous deletion, and are associated with poor clinical outcome.
Copyright © 2011 UICC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21154748     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.25841

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  19 in total

Review 1.  Critical appraisal of quantitative PCR results in colorectal cancer research: can we rely on published qPCR results?

Authors:  J R Dijkstra; L C van Kempen; I D Nagtegaal; S A Bustin
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 6.603

2.  Integrated high-resolution array CGH and SKY analysis of homozygous deletions and other genomic alterations present in malignant mesothelioma cell lines.

Authors:  Geula Klorin; Ester Rozenblum; Oleg Glebov; Robert L Walker; Yoonsoo Park; Paul S Meltzer; Ilan R Kirsch; Frederic J Kaye; Anna V Roschke
Journal:  Cancer Genet       Date:  2013-07-05

3.  Single nucleotide polymorphism array analysis of microsatellite-stable, diploid/near-diploid colorectal carcinomas without the CpG island methylator phenotype.

Authors:  Michael Linnebacher; Christiane Ostwald; Dirk Koczan; Tareq Salem; Björn Schneider; Mathias Krohn; Mathias Ernst; Friedrich Prall
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 4.  Orchestration of neurodevelopmental programs by RBFOX1: implications for autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Brent R Bill; Jennifer K Lowe; Christina T Dybuncio; Brent L Fogel
Journal:  Int Rev Neurobiol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.230

Review 5.  Somatic gene copy number alterations in colorectal cancer: new quest for cancer drivers and biomarkers.

Authors:  H Wang; L Liang; J-Y Fang; J Xu
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 9.867

6.  Two Distinct Categories of Focal Deletions in Cancer Genomes.

Authors:  Megha Rajaram; Jianping Zhang; Tim Wang; Jinyu Li; Cem Kuscu; Huan Qi; Mamoru Kato; Vladimir Grubor; Robert J Weil; Aslaug Helland; Anne-Lise Borrenson-Dale; Kathleen R Cho; Douglas A Levine; Alan N Houghton; Jedd D Wolchok; Lois Myeroff; Sanford D Markowitz; Scott W Lowe; Michael Zhang; Alex Krasnitz; Robert Lucito; David Mu; R Scott Powers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Prognostic Value of Germline Copy Number Variants and Environmental Exposures in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Shizhen Chen; Liming Lu; Jianfeng Xian; Changhong Shi; Jinbin Chen; Boqi Rao; Fuman Qiu; Jiachun Lu; Lei Yang
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 4.599

8.  Chromosomal instability in BRAF mutant, microsatellite stable colorectal cancers.

Authors:  Catherine E Bond; Aarti Umapathy; Ron L Buttenshaw; Leesa Wockner; Barbara A Leggett; Vicki L J Whitehall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A comprehensive characterization of genome-wide copy number aberrations in colorectal cancer reveals novel oncogenes and patterns of alterations.

Authors:  Tao Xie; Giovanni D' Ario; John R Lamb; Eric Martin; Kai Wang; Sabine Tejpar; Mauro Delorenzi; Fred T Bosman; Arnaud D Roth; Pu Yan; Stephanie Bougel; Antonio Fabio Di Narzo; Vlad Popovici; Eva Budinská; Mao Mao; Scott L Weinrich; Paul A Rejto; J Graeme Hodgson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Analysis of colorectal cancers in British Bangladeshi identifies early onset, frequent mucinous histotype and a high prevalence of RBFOX1 deletion.

Authors:  Neel Sengupta; Christopher Yau; Anuratha Sakthianandeswaren; Dmitri Mouradov; Peter Gibbs; Nirosha Suraweera; Jean-Baptiste Cazier; Guadalupe Polanco-Echeverry; Anil Ghosh; Mohamed Thaha; Shafi Ahmed; Roger Feakins; David Propper; Sina Dorudi; Oliver Sieber; Andrew Silver; Cecilia Lai
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 27.401

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.