Literature DB >> 21153898

Prognostic factor analyses of myeloma survival with intergroup trial S9321 (INT 0141): examining whether different variables govern different time segments of survival.

Bart Barlogie1, Vanessa Bolejack, Michael Schell, John Crowley.   

Abstract

Multiple myeloma (MM) survival plots usually display steeper initial and shallower subsequent slopes reflecting differences in disease biology and likely prognostic factors (PF). S9321 trial was selected to determine PF operative at baseline and subsequent 3, 4, 5, and 7-year landmarks (LM-0, LM-3, LM-4, LM-5, and LM-7). With a median follow-up of 8.2 years, survival was similar in transplant and standard therapy arms, justifying data pooling. Median survival for 775 eligible patients is 48 months. According to proportional hazards models, seven of 12 investigated baseline variables retained independent significance for LM-0, of which only two (beta-2-microglobulin and age) extended out to LM-7; the remaining five comprised features of disease aggressiveness (lactate dehydrogenase, calcium, platelet count, C-reactive protein) and host co-morbidity (performance status). Our observations of LM dependency of PF can be exploited toward advancing myeloma therapy by stratifying patients according to whether early or late portions of the survival history are being targeted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21153898      PMCID: PMC3053415          DOI: 10.1007/s00277-010-1130-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Hematol        ISSN: 0939-5555            Impact factor:   3.673


  17 in total

Review 1.  Multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Robert A Kyle; S Vincent Rajkumar
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-10-28       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Standard chemotherapy compared with high-dose chemoradiotherapy for multiple myeloma: final results of phase III US Intergroup Trial S9321.

Authors:  Bart Barlogie; Robert A Kyle; Kenneth C Anderson; Philip R Greipp; Hillard M Lazarus; David D Hurd; Jason McCoy; Dennis F Moore; Shaker R Dakhil; Keith S Lanier; Robert A Chapman; Jeana N Cromer; Sydney E Salmon; Brian Durie; John C Crowley
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-01-23       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Hazard rate estimation under random censoring with varying kernels and bandwidths.

Authors:  H G Müller; J L Wang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  International staging system for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Philip R Greipp; Jesus San Miguel; Brian G M Durie; John J Crowley; Bart Barlogie; Joan Bladé; Mario Boccadoro; J Anthony Child; Herve Avet-Loiseau; Jean-Luc Harousseau; Robert A Kyle; Juan J Lahuerta; Heinz Ludwig; Gareth Morgan; Raymond Powles; Kazuyuki Shimizu; Chaim Shustik; Pieter Sonneveld; Patrizia Tosi; Ingemar Turesson; Jan Westin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-04-04       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Antitumor activity of thalidomide in refractory multiple myeloma.

Authors:  S Singhal; J Mehta; R Desikan; D Ayers; P Roberson; P Eddlemon; N Munshi; E Anaissie; C Wilson; M Dhodapkar; J Zeddis; B Barlogie
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-11-18       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  A randomized phase 2 study of lenalidomide therapy for patients with relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Paul G Richardson; Emily Blood; Constantine S Mitsiades; Sundar Jagannath; Steven R Zeldenrust; Melissa Alsina; Robert L Schlossman; S Vincent Rajkumar; K Raman Desikan; Teru Hideshima; Nikhil C Munshi; Kathleen Kelly-Colson; Deborah Doss; Mary L McKenney; Svetlana Gorelik; Diane Warren; Andrea Freeman; Rebecca Rich; Anfang Wu; Marta Olesnyckyj; Kenton Wride; William S Dalton; Jerome Zeldis; Robert Knight; Edie Weller; Kenneth C Anderson
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-07-13       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell rescue for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  J Anthony Child; Gareth J Morgan; Faith E Davies; Roger G Owen; Susan E Bell; Kim Hawkins; Julia Brown; Mark T Drayson; Peter J Selby
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-05-08       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  A clinical staging system for multiple myeloma. Correlation of measured myeloma cell mass with presenting clinical features, response to treatment, and survival.

Authors:  B G Durie; S E Salmon
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Thalidomide and hematopoietic-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Bart Barlogie; Guido Tricot; Elias Anaissie; John Shaughnessy; Erik Rasmussen; Frits van Rhee; Athanasios Fassas; Maurizio Zangari; Klaus Hollmig; Mauricio Pineda-Roman; Choon Lee; Giampaolo Talamo; Raymond Thertulien; Elias Kiwan; Somashekar Krishna; Michele Fox; John Crowley
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Single versus double autologous stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Michel Attal; Jean-Luc Harousseau; Thierry Facon; François Guilhot; Chantal Doyen; Jean-Gabriel Fuzibet; Mathieu Monconduit; Cyrille Hulin; Denis Caillot; Reda Bouabdallah; Laurent Voillat; Jean-Jacques Sotto; Bernard Grosbois; Regis Bataille
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-12-25       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  16 in total

1.  Retrospective matched-pairs analysis of bortezomib plus dexamethasone versus bortezomib monotherapy in relapsed multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Meletios A Dimopoulos; Robert Z Orlowski; Thierry Facon; Pieter Sonneveld; Kenneth C Anderson; Meral Beksac; Lotfi Benboubker; Huw Roddie; Anna Potamianou; Catherine Couturier; Huaibao Feng; Ozlem Ataman; Helgi van de Velde; Paul G Richardson
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 9.941

2.  A risk-based measure of time-varying prognostic discrimination for survival models.

Authors:  C Jason Liang; Patrick J Heagerty
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL) imaging of multiple myeloma: initial clinical efficiency results.

Authors:  Miyuki Takasu; Chihiro Tani; Yasuko Sakoda; Miho Ishikawa; Keizo Tanitame; Shuji Date; Yuji Akiyama; Akira Sakai; Hideki Asaoku; Toshio Kajima; Kazuo Awai
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-12-04       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Modeling Covariate-Adjusted Survival for Economic Evaluations in Oncology.

Authors:  Istvan M Majer; Jean-Gabriel Castaigne; Stephen Palmer; Lucy DeCosta; Marco Campioni
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Chromosome 1 abnormalities in elderly patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma treated with novel therapies.

Authors:  Simona Caltagirone; Marina Ruggeri; Simona Aschero; Milena Gilestro; Daniela Oddolo; Francesca Gay; Sara Bringhen; Caterina Musolino; Luca Baldini; Pellegrino Musto; Maria T Petrucci; Gianluca Gaidano; Roberto Passera; Benedetto Bruno; Antonio Palumbo; Mario Boccadoro; Paola Omedè
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 9.941

6.  Revised International Staging System for Multiple Myeloma: A Report From International Myeloma Working Group.

Authors:  Antonio Palumbo; Hervé Avet-Loiseau; Stefania Oliva; Henk M Lokhorst; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Laura Rosinol; Paul Richardson; Simona Caltagirone; Juan José Lahuerta; Thierry Facon; Sara Bringhen; Francesca Gay; Michel Attal; Roberto Passera; Andrew Spencer; Massimo Offidani; Shaji Kumar; Pellegrino Musto; Sagar Lonial; Maria T Petrucci; Robert Z Orlowski; Elena Zamagni; Gareth Morgan; Meletios A Dimopoulos; Brian G M Durie; Kenneth C Anderson; Pieter Sonneveld; Jésus San Miguel; Michele Cavo; S Vincent Rajkumar; Philippe Moreau
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  High levels of circulating CD34+ cells at autologous stem cell collection are associated with favourable prognosis in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  J Raschle; D Ratschiller; S Mans; B U Mueller; T Pabst
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  The prognostic impact of inflammatory factors in patients with multiple myeloma treated with thalidomide in Korea.

Authors:  Cheolsu Kim; Ho Sup Lee; Chang-Ki Min; Je Jung Lee; Kihyun Kim; Dok Hyun Yoon; Hyeon Seok Eom; Hyewon Lee; Won Sik Lee; Ho-Jin Shin; Ji Hyun Lee; Yong Park; Jae-Cheol Jo; Young Rok Do; Yeung-Chul Mun
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 2.884

9.  Myeloma prognostic index at diagnosis might be a prognostic marker in patients newly diagnosed with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Dae Sik Kim; Eun Sang Yu; Ka-Won Kang; Se Ryeon Lee; Yong Park; Hwa Jung Sung; Chul Won Choi; Byung Soo Kim
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 2.884

10.  Risk of Early Mortality in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Pei Hsu; Ting-Wei Lin; Jyh-Pyng Gau; Yuan-Bin Yu; Liang-Tsai Hsiao; Cheng-Hwai Tzeng; Po-Min Chen; Tzeon-Jye Chiou; Jin-Hwang Liu; Yao-Chung Liu; Chia-Jen Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.