Literature DB >> 21153862

Differences in gene expression amplitude overlie a conserved transcriptomic program occurring between the rapid and potent localized resistant reaction at the syncytium of the Glycine max genotype Peking (PI 548402) as compared to the prolonged and potent resistant reaction of PI 88788.

Vincent P Klink1, Parsa Hosseini, Prachi D Matsye, Nadim W Alkharouf, Benjamin F Matthews.   

Abstract

Glycine max L. Merr. (soybean) resistance to Heterodera glycines Ichinohe occurs at the site of infection, a nurse cell known as the syncytium. Resistance is classified into two cytologically-defined responses, the G. max ([Peking])- and G. max ([PI 88788])-types. Each type represents a cohort of G. max genotypes. Resistance in G. max ([Peking]) occurs by a potent and rapid localized response, affecting parasitic second stage juveniles (p-J2). In contrast, resistance occurs by a potent but more prolonged reaction in the genotype G. max ([PI 88788]) that affects nematode development at the J3 and J4 stages. Microarray analyses comparing these cytologically and developmentally distinct resistant reactions reveal differences in gene expression in pericycle and surrounding cells even before infection. The differences include higher relative levels of the differentially expressed in response to arachidonic acid 1 gene (DEA1 [Gm-DEA1]) (+224.19-fold) and a protease inhibitor (+68.28-fold) in G. max ([Peking/PI 548402]) as compared to G. max ([PI 88788]). Gene pathway analyses compare the two genotypes (1) before, (2) at various times during, (3) constitutively throughout the resistant reaction and (4) at all time points prior to and during the resistant reaction. The amplified levels of transcriptional activity of defense genes may explain the rapid and potent reaction in G. max ([Peking/PI 548402]) as compared to G. max ([PI 88788]). In contrast, the shared differential expression levels of genes in G. max ([Peking/PI 548402]) and G. max ([PI 88788]) may indicate a conserved genomic program underlying the G. max resistance on which the genotype-specific gene expression programs are built off.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21153862     DOI: 10.1007/s11103-010-9715-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Mol Biol        ISSN: 0167-4412            Impact factor:   4.076


  62 in total

1.  Cell surgery by laser micro-dissection: a preparative method.

Authors:  G Isenberg; W Bielser; W Meier-Ruge; E Remy
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 1.758

2.  Insertional mutagenesis of genes required for seed development in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  J McElver; I Tzafrir; G Aux; R Rogers; C Ashby; K Smith; C Thomas; A Schetter; Q Zhou; M A Cushman; J Tossberg; T Nickle; J Z Levin; M Law; D Meinke; D Patton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Syncytium gene expression in Glycine max([PI 88788]) roots undergoing a resistant reaction to the parasitic nematode Heterodera glycines.

Authors:  Vincent P Klink; Parsa Hosseini; Prachi D Matsye; Nadim W Alkharouf; Benjamin F Matthews
Journal:  Plant Physiol Biochem       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 4.270

4.  A Technique for Evaluating Heterodera glycines Development in Susceptible and Resistant Soybean.

Authors:  J M Halbrendt; S A Lewis; E R Shipe
Journal:  J Nematol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 1.402

5.  Optimization of the Heterodera glycines Race Test Procedure.

Authors:  R D Riggs; D P Schmitt
Journal:  J Nematol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 1.402

6.  A Revised Classification Scheme for Genetically Diverse Populations of Heterodera glycines.

Authors:  T L Niblack; P R Arelli; G R Noel; C H Opperman; J H Orf; D P Schmitt; J G Shannon; G L Tylka
Journal:  J Nematol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.402

7.  Eicosapentaenoic and Arachidonic Acids from Phytophthora infestans Elicit Fungitoxic Sesquiterpenes in the Potato.

Authors:  R M Bostock; J A Kuc; R A Laine
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-04-03       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Impact of phyto-oxylipins in plant defense.

Authors:  Elizabeth Blée
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 18.313

9.  Species-specific glucosylation of DIMBOA in larvae of the rice Armyworm.

Authors:  Hiroaki Sasai; Masahiro Ishida; Kenjiro Murakami; Naoko Tadokoro; Atsushi Ishihara; Ritsuo Nishida; Naoki Mori
Journal:  Biosci Biotechnol Biochem       Date:  2009-06-07       Impact factor: 2.043

10.  Rapid and dynamic subcellular reorganization following mechanical stimulation of Arabidopsis epidermal cells mimics responses to fungal and oomycete attack.

Authors:  Adrienne R Hardham; Daigo Takemoto; Rosemary G White
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2008-06-02       Impact factor: 4.215

View more
  14 in total

1.  Mapping cell fate decisions that occur during soybean defense responses.

Authors:  Prachi D Matsye; Ranjit Kumar; Parsa Hosseini; Christina M Jones; Arianne Tremblay; Nadim W Alkharouf; Benjamin F Matthews; Vincent P Klink
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 4.076

2.  The expression of a naturally occurring, truncated allele of an α-SNAP gene suppresses plant parasitic nematode infection.

Authors:  Prachi D Matsye; Gary W Lawrence; Reham M Youssef; Kyung-Hwan Kim; Katheryn S Lawrence; Benjamin F Matthews; Vincent P Klink
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 4.076

3.  Distinct Copy Number, Coding Sequence, and Locus Methylation Patterns Underlie Rhg1-Mediated Soybean Resistance to Soybean Cyst Nematode.

Authors:  David E Cook; Adam M Bayless; Kai Wang; Xiaoli Guo; Qijian Song; Jiming Jiang; Andrew F Bent
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Early transcriptional responses to soybean cyst nematode HG Type 0 show genetic differences among resistant and susceptible soybeans.

Authors:  Esmaeil Miraeiz; Usawadee Chaiprom; Alireza Afsharifar; Akbar Karegar; Jenny M Drnevich; Matthew E Hudson
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Whole-genome gene expression profiling revealed genes and pathways potentially involved in regulating interactions of soybean with cyst nematode (Heterodera glycines Ichinohe).

Authors:  Jinrong Wan; Tri Vuong; Yongqing Jiao; Trupti Joshi; Hongxin Zhang; Dong Xu; Henry T Nguyen
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  Engineered resistance and hypersusceptibility through functional metabolic studies of 100 genes in soybean to its major pathogen, the soybean cyst nematode.

Authors:  Benjamin F Matthews; Hunter Beard; Margaret H MacDonald; Sara Kabir; Reham M Youssef; Parsa Hosseini; Eric Brewer
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 4.116

7.  Genome wide comprehensive analysis and web resource development on cell wall degrading enzymes from phyto-parasitic nematodes.

Authors:  Krishan Mohan Rai; Vimal Kumar Balasubramanian; Cassie Marie Welker; Mingxiong Pang; Mei Mei Hii; Venugopal Mendu
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 4.215

8.  Aboveground feeding by soybean aphid, Aphis glycines, affects soybean cyst nematode, Heterodera glycines, reproduction belowground.

Authors:  Michael T McCarville; David H Soh; Gregory L Tylka; Matthew E O'Neal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  SCNProDB: A database for the identification of soybean cyst nematode proteins.

Authors:  Savithiry Natarajan; Mona Tavakolan; Nadim W Alkharouf; Benjamin F Matthews
Journal:  Bioinformation       Date:  2014-06-30

10.  Transcriptome Analysis of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Genotypes That Are Susceptible, Resistant, and Hypersensitive to Reniform Nematode (Rotylenchulus reniformis).

Authors:  Ruijuan Li; Aaron M Rashotte; Narendra K Singh; Kathy S Lawrence; David B Weaver; Robert D Locy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.