Literature DB >> 21153798

[Relevance of five core aspects of the pre-anesthesia visit: results of a patient survey].

H Aust1, L H J Eberhart, G Kalmus, M Zoremba, D Rüsch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Due to a variety of reasons (e.g. increase in outpatient surgery and legal restrictions related to working hours) it has become increasingly more difficult to have the pre-anesthesia visit and the anesthesia carried out by the same anesthetist. In the light of these organizational changes as well as increasing economical pressure it has become common practice to implement pre-anesthesia assessment clinics. It is unclear, however, if these changes in anesthetic patient care respect patient needs.
METHODS: By means of a survey using the willingness to pay method, the relative significance of five quality aspects (location of pre-anesthesia visit, waiting time, patient-physician relationship, use of multimedia and ambience) were studied. Participation during a 12-month study period was on a voluntary basis.
RESULTS: Of the 1,058 questionnaires, 1,014 were eligible for analysis. A pre-anesthesia visit performed by the anesthetist who would deliver anesthesia was the most important aspect for almost two thirds (624 out of 1,014) of the patients with on average more than one third of the money available spent on this item. Waiting time was the second most important factor with about one third of the patients rating this item as the most relevant factor and on average approximately one quarter of the total money available spent on it. Location of the pre-anesthesia visit, use of multimedia and ambience were considered least important. The order of these preferences was regardless of age and gender of subjects. However, there was a trend to age and gender-specific differences concerning the amount of money spent on these five items. For instance, with increasing age, patient-physician relationship and location of the pre-anesthesia visit become more important.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the integration of a pre-anesthesia assessment clinic in anesthetic patient care is not favorable from the patients' point of view because getting to know the anesthetist who will deliver anesthesia is of paramount importance to most patients. In cases where a pre-anesthetic assessment clinic is indispensable, other measures to build up confidence compensating for the lack of personal patient-physician relationship should be developed. In this respect, the promotion of a corporate identity of the whole anesthesia department may be beneficial. Furthermore, keeping the waiting time as short as possible should be a high priority as this item was rated the second most important factor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21153798     DOI: 10.1007/s00101-010-1828-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesist        ISSN: 0003-2417            Impact factor:   1.041


  17 in total

1.  Willingness to pay methods in health care: a sceptical view.

Authors:  Richard Cookson
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  [Premedication, preoperative and postoperative visits. Importance as reflected in anaesthesiology textbooks].

Authors:  W Witte
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Emotional and psychological preoperative preparation in adults.

Authors:  Jennie April Walker
Journal:  Br J Nurs       Date:  2002 Apr 25-May 8

4.  Information provision, patient involvement, and emotional support: prospective areas for improving anesthetic care.

Authors:  H D Hadjistavropoulos; J Dobson; J A Boisvert
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.063

5.  [Multimedia preoperative patient information].

Authors:  S Klima; W Hein; A Hube; R Hube
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  Beyond 'doctor and patient': developments in the study of healthcare interactions.

Authors:  Alison Pilnick; Jon Hindmarsh; Virginia Teas Gill
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2009-09

7.  Patient knowledge of operative care.

Authors:  O A Williams
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 8.  [Premedication visits. Economizing at the cost of the patient?].

Authors:  C D Kratz; M Christ; B Maisch; K M Kerwat; C Olt; A Zielke; A Hellinger; H Wulf; G Geldner
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.041

9.  Patient choice in general practice: the implications of patient satisfaction surveys.

Authors:  Ruth Robertson; Anna Dixon; Julian Le Grand
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2008-04

10.  Breast cancer patients' trust in physicians: the impact of patients' perception of physicians' communication behaviors and hospital organizational climate.

Authors:  Christoph Kowalski; Anika Nitzsche; Fueloep Scheibler; Petra Steffen; Ute-Susann Albert; Holger Pfaff
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-10-09
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  [Communication with children: practical hints and tools for the anesthesiology routine].

Authors:  N Zech; M Seemann; S Signer-Fischer; E Hansen
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  [Premedication visits in departments of anesthesiology in Hessen. Compilation of organizational and performance portfolios].

Authors:  H Aust; B Veltum; T Wächtershäuser; H Wulf; L Eberhart
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  The cost-effectiveness of an outpatient anesthesia consultation clinic before surgery: a matched Hong Kong cohort study.

Authors:  Anna Lee; Po Tong Chui; Chun Hung Chiu; Tony Gin; Anthony Mh Ho
Journal:  Perioper Med (Lond)       Date:  2012-06-27

4.  Coping strategies in anxious surgical patients.

Authors:  Hansjoerg Aust; Dirk Rüsch; Maike Schuster; Theresa Sturm; Felix Brehm; Yvonne Nestoriuc
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 2.655

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.