Literature DB >> 18416910

Patient choice in general practice: the implications of patient satisfaction surveys.

Ruth Robertson1, Anna Dixon, Julian Le Grand.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify factors that explain patient satisfaction with general practice physicians and hence that may drive patients' choice of practice.
METHODS: Logistic regression analysis of English National Health Service national patient survey data is used to identify the aspects of general practice care that are associated with high levels of overall satisfaction among patients.
RESULTS: Confidence and trust in the doctor is the most important factor in explaining the variation in overall patient satisfaction (predicting 82% of satisfaction levels accurately). The seven variables relating to the relationship between patient and doctor have stronger explanatory power than other aspects of the general practitioner (GP) experience. The variables with the lowest overall predictive power are whether the patient was told how long they would have to wait in the surgery (72%), the length of time they had to wait after their appointment time (74%) and ability to get through to the surgery on the phone (74%).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients value the quality of their relationship with their doctor more than the appearance of the surgery, accessibility of appointments and their experience in the waiting room. This suggests that, if current restrictions on choice of GP were removed, we would in theory expect a patient's choice to be driven by the quality of the doctor-patient relationship. Once a patient establishes a good relationship with a GP, however, we might expect them to be loyal and therefore unlikely to change practice unless the relationship with the doctor breaks down. Although relationship factors are important to the satisfaction of patients, it is not clear that they will lead large numbers of people to change their GP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18416910     DOI: 10.1258/jhsrp.2007.007055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy        ISSN: 1355-8196


  10 in total

1.  What patients say about their doctors online: a qualitative content analysis.

Authors:  Andrea López; Alissa Detz; Neda Ratanawongsa; Urmimala Sarkar
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  The economics of choice: lessons from the U.S. health-care market.

Authors:  Yaniv Hanoch; Thomas Rice
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Patient demographics as a predictive tool of consultation duration.

Authors:  Volha Pankevich
Journal:  London J Prim Care (Abingdon)       Date:  2014

4.  [Relevance of five core aspects of the pre-anesthesia visit: results of a patient survey].

Authors:  H Aust; L H J Eberhart; G Kalmus; M Zoremba; D Rüsch
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  Accessing primary care: a simulated patient study.

Authors:  John L Campbell; Mary Carter; Antoinette Davey; Martin J Roberts; Marc N Elliott; Martin Roland
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Patients' perspectives on providing a stool sample to their GP: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Donna M Lecky; Meredith K D Hawking; Cliodna A M McNulty
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Residents' Willingness to Maintain Contracts with Family Doctors: a Cross-sectional Study in China.

Authors:  Chao Wang; Shijiao Yan; Heng Jiang; Zhiqiang Nie; Mia Miller; Yan He; Yingying Guo; Yong Gan; Qingfeng Tian; Chuanzhu Lv; Zuxun Lu
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 8.  Determinants of patient choice of healthcare providers: a scoping review.

Authors:  Aafke Victoor; Diana M J Delnoij; Roland D Friele; Jany J D J M Rademakers
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 2.908

9.  Australians with osteoarthritis: satisfaction with health care providers and the perceived helpfulness of treatments and information sources.

Authors:  Martin Basedow; Peter Hibbert; Tamara Hooper; William Runciman; Adrian Esterman
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2016-08-22

10.  Does Quality Affect Patients' Choice of Doctor? Evidence from England.

Authors:  Rita Santos; Hugh Gravelle; Carol Propper
Journal:  Econ J (London)       Date:  2016-02-23
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.