AIM: To evaluate race differences in the pharmacodynamics of rosuvastatin in Western and Asian hypercholesterolemia patients using a population pharmacodynamic (PPD) model generated and validated using published clinical efficacy trials. METHODS: Published studies randomized trials with rosuvastatin treatment for at least 4 weeks in hypercholesterolemia patients were used for model building and validation. Population pharmacodynamic analyses were performed to describe the dose-response relationship with the mean values of LDL-C reduction (%) from dose-ranging trials using NONMEM software. Baseline LDL-C and race were analyzed as the potential covariates. Model robustness was evaluated using the bootstrap method and the data-splitting method, and Monte Carlo simulation was performed to assess the predictive performance of the PPD model with the mean effects from the one-dose trials. RESULTS: Of the 36 eligible trials, 14 dose-ranging trials were used in model development and 22 one-dose trials were used for model prediction. The dose-response of rosuvastatin was successfully described by a simple E(max) model with a fixed E(0), which provided a common E(max) and an approximate twofold difference in ED(50) for Westerners and Asians. The PPD model was demonstrated to be stable and predictive. CONCLUSION: The race differences in the pharmacodynamics of rosuvastatin are consistent with those observed in the pharmacokinetics of the drug, confirming that there is no significant difference in the exposure-response relationship for LDL-C reduction between Westerners and Asians. The study suggests that for a new compound with a mechanism of action similar to that of rosuvastatin, its efficacy in Western populations plus its pharmacokinetics in bridging studies in Asian populations may be used to support a registration of the new compound in Asian countries.
AIM: To evaluate race differences in the pharmacodynamics of rosuvastatin in Western and Asian hypercholesterolemiapatients using a population pharmacodynamic (PPD) model generated and validated using published clinical efficacy trials. METHODS: Published studies randomized trials with rosuvastatin treatment for at least 4 weeks in hypercholesterolemiapatients were used for model building and validation. Population pharmacodynamic analyses were performed to describe the dose-response relationship with the mean values of LDL-C reduction (%) from dose-ranging trials using NONMEM software. Baseline LDL-C and race were analyzed as the potential covariates. Model robustness was evaluated using the bootstrap method and the data-splitting method, and Monte Carlo simulation was performed to assess the predictive performance of the PPD model with the mean effects from the one-dose trials. RESULTS: Of the 36 eligible trials, 14 dose-ranging trials were used in model development and 22 one-dose trials were used for model prediction. The dose-response of rosuvastatin was successfully described by a simple E(max) model with a fixed E(0), which provided a common E(max) and an approximate twofold difference in ED(50) for Westerners and Asians. The PPD model was demonstrated to be stable and predictive. CONCLUSION: The race differences in the pharmacodynamics of rosuvastatin are consistent with those observed in the pharmacokinetics of the drug, confirming that there is no significant difference in the exposure-response relationship for LDL-C reduction between Westerners and Asians. The study suggests that for a new compound with a mechanism of action similar to that of rosuvastatin, its efficacy in Western populations plus its pharmacokinetics in bridging studies in Asian populations may be used to support a registration of the new compound in Asian countries.
Authors: Lawrence A Leiter; Robert S Rosenson; Evan Stein; John P D Reckless; Karl-Ludwig Schulte; Margo Schleman; Paul Miller; Michael Palmer; Froukje Sosef Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2007-01-16 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Alberico L Catapano; Michael H Davidson; Christie M Ballantyne; William E Brady; Russell A Gazzara; Joanne E Tomassini; Andrew M Tershakovec Journal: Curr Med Res Opin Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 2.580
Authors: Jaap W Mandema; David Hermann; Wenping Wang; Tim Sheiner; Mark Milad; Rebecca Bakker-Arkema; Daniel Hartman Journal: AAPS J Date: 2005-10-07 Impact factor: 4.009
Authors: Bela F Asztalos; Florence Le Maulf; Gerald E Dallal; Evan Stein; Peter H Jones; Katalin V Horvath; Fergus McTaggart; Ernst J Schaefer Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2007-01-04 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Sriram Naresh; Aparna R Bitla; P V L N Srinivasa Rao; Alok Sachan; Yadagiri Lakshmi Amancharla Journal: Endocrine Date: 2020-09-07 Impact factor: 3.633