Literature DB >> 21150798

Effects of direct-to-consumer advertising and clinical guidelines on appropriate use of human papillomavirus DNA tests.

Rebecca Anhang Price1, Richard G Frank, Paul D Cleary, Sue J Goldie.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Both clinical guidelines and direct-to-consumer (DTC) advertising influence the use of new health care technologies, but little is known about their relative effects. The introduction of a cervical cancer screening test in 2000 offered a unique opportunity to assess the 2 strategies.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of clinical guidelines and a targeted DTC advertising campaign on overall and appropriate use of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA tests. RESEARCH
DESIGN: Quasi-experimental study using difference-in-differences analysis. Data were MarketScan private insurance claims for 500,000 women aged 21 to 64 enrolled at least 12 consecutive months from January 2001 through December 2005.
RESULTS: Both clinical guidelines and DTC advertising were associated with increases in overall HPV DNA test use. DTC advertising was associated with a statistically significant increase in HPV DNA test use in 2 groups of DTC cities (+5.57%, P < 0.0001; +2.54%, P < 0.0001). DTC advertising was associated with comparable increases in the probability of appropriate and inappropriate use of the HPV DNA test in primary screening. Clinical guideline releases from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and by a cosponsored panel, were associated with greater increases in HPV DNA tests for appropriate primary screening than for inappropriate primary screening (β = 0.3347, P < 0.05 and β = 0.4175, P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: DTC advertising was associated with increased overall use of a cervical cancer screening test, whereas clinical guidelines were differentially associated with increased appropriate use. These findings suggest distinct influences of consumer marketing and professional guidelines on the use of health care products and services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21150798      PMCID: PMC3206730          DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181f81c63

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  17 in total

1.  Medscape's response to the Institute of Medicine Report: Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century.

Authors:  M Leavitt
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2001-03-05

2.  ACOG Practice Bulletin: clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. Number 45, August 2003. Cervical cytology screening (replaces committee opinion 152, March 1995).

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Direct-to-consumer advertising: a haphazard approach to health promotion.

Authors:  Matthew F Hollon
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-04-27       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  The emergence of clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  George Weisz; Alberto Cambrosio; Peter Keating; Loes Knaapen; Thomas Schlich; Virginie J Tournay
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.911

5.  Direct-to-consumer advertising of COX-2 inhibitors: effect on appropriateness of prescribing.

Authors:  Michele M Spence; Stephanie S Teleki; T Craig Cheetham; Stuart O Schweitzer; Mirta Millares
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.929

6.  Influence of patients' requests for direct-to-consumer advertised antidepressants: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Richard L Kravitz; Ronald M Epstein; Mitchell D Feldman; Carol E Franz; Rahman Azari; Michael S Wilkes; Ladson Hinton; Peter Franks
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-04-27       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Physicians report on patient encounters involving direct-to-consumer advertising.

Authors:  Joel S Weissman; David Blumenthal; Alvin J Silk; Michael Newman; Kinga Zapert; Robert Leitman; Sandra Feibelmann
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2004 Jan-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  Using a drug facts box to communicate drug benefits and harms: two randomized trials.

Authors:  Lisa M Schwartz; Steven Woloshin; H Gilbert Welch
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-02-16       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 9.  Interim guidance for the use of human papillomavirus DNA testing as an adjunct to cervical cytology for screening.

Authors:  Thomas C Wright; Mark Schiffman; Diane Solomon; J Thomas Cox; Francisco Garcia; Sue Goldie; Kenneth Hatch; Kenneth L Noller; Nancy Roach; Carolyn Runowicz; Debbie Saslow
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Direct-to-consumer advertising: physicians' views of its effects on quality of care and the doctor-patient relationship.

Authors:  Elizabeth Murray; Bernard Lo; Lance Pollack; Karen Donelan; Ken Lee
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Pract       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec
View more
  4 in total

1.  Update on Direct-to-Consumer Marketing in Oncology.

Authors:  Stacy W Gray; Gregory A Abel
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  Multilevel interventions: study design and analysis issues.

Authors:  Paul D Cleary; Cary P Gross; Alan M Zaslavsky; Stephen H Taplin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2012-05

3.  Health care providers and direct-to-consumer access and advertising of genetic testing in the United States.

Authors:  Melanie F Myers
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 15.266

4.  Evaluating whether direct-to-consumer marketing can increase demand for evidence-based practice among parents of adolescents with substance use disorders: rationale and protocol.

Authors:  Sara J Becker
Journal:  Addict Sci Clin Pract       Date:  2015-02-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.