Literature DB >> 21150757

Incidence of unintended durotomy in spine surgery based on 108,478 cases.

Brian J Williams1, Charles A Sansur, Justin S Smith, Sigurd H Berven, Paul A Broadstone, Theodore J Choma, Michael J Goytan, Hilali H Noordeen, D Raymond Knapp, Robert A Hart, Reinhard D Zeller, William F Donaldson, David W Polly, Joseph H Perra, Oheneba Boachie-Adjei, Christopher I Shaffrey.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Unintended durotomy is a common complication of spinal surgery. However, the incidences reported in the literature vary widely and are based primarily on relatively small case numbers from a single surgeon or institution.
OBJECTIVE: To provide spine surgeons with a reliable incidence of unintended durotomy in spinal surgery and to assess various factors that may influence the risk of durotomy.
METHODS: We assessed 108,478 surgical cases prospectively submitted by members of the Scoliosis Research Society to a deidentified database from 2004 to 2007.
RESULTS: Unintended durotomy occurred in 1.6% (1745 of 108 478) of all cases. The incidence of unintended durotomy ranged from 1.1% to 1.9% on the basis of preoperative diagnosis, with the highest incidence among patients treated for kyphosis (1.9%) or spondylolisthesis (1.9%) and the lowest incidence among patients treated for scoliosis (1.1%). The most common indication for spine surgery was degenerative spinal disorder, and among these patients, there was a lower incidence of durotomy for cervical (1.0%) vs thoracic (2.2%; P = .01) or lumbar (2.1%, P < .001) cases. Scoliosis procedures were further characterized by etiology, with the highest incidence of durotomy in the degenerative subgroup (2.2% vs 1.1%; P < .001). Durotomy was more common in revision compared with primary surgery (2.2% vs 1.5%; P < .001) and was significantly more common among elderly (> 80 years of age) patients (2.2% vs 1.6%; P = .006). There was a significant association between unintended durotomy and development of a new neurological deficit (P < .001).
CONCLUSION: Unintended durotomy occurred in at least 1.6% of spinal surgeries, even among experienced surgeons. Our data provide general benchmarks of durotomy rates and serve as a basis for ongoing efforts to improve safety of care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21150757     DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3181fcf14e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  20 in total

1.  Remote Cerebellar Hemorrhage Complicating Unintended Durotomy in Lumbar Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Yizhar Floman; Michael A Millgram; Ely Ashkenazi; Nahshon Rand
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-07-14

2.  Incidental durotomy in decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: incidence, risk factors and effect on outcomes in the Spine Tango registry.

Authors:  Christian Herren; Rolf Sobottke; Anne F Mannion; Thomas Zweig; Everard Munting; Philippe Otten; Tim Pigott; Jan Siewe; Emin Aghayev
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  What's new in spine surgery.

Authors:  Keith H Bridwell; Paul A Anderson; Scott D Boden; Alexander R Vaccaro; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 4.  Complications of surgical intervention in adult lumbar scoliosis.

Authors:  Peter A Christiansen; Michael LaBagnara; Durga R Sure; Christopher I Shaffrey; Justin S Smith
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-09

Review 5.  Spinal dura mater: biophysical characteristics relevant to medical device development.

Authors:  Sean J Nagel; Chandan G Reddy; Leonardo A Frizon; Matthieu K Chardon; Marshall Holland; Andre G Machado; George T Gillies; Matthew A Howard; Saul Wilson
Journal:  J Med Eng Technol       Date:  2018-03-23

6.  Incidental dural tear in spine surgery: analysis of a nationwide database.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Yoshihara; Daisuke Yoneoka
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Reliability Of A Surgeon-Reported Morbidity And Mortality Database: A Comparison Of Short-Term Morbidity Between The Scoliosis Research Society And National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Databases.

Authors:  Christopher T Martin; Andrew J Pugely; Yubo Gao; Branko Skovrlj; Nathan J Lee; Samuel K Cho; Sergio Mendoza-Lattes
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2016

8.  Safe Discharge of Patients From an Ambulatory Care Center After Incidental Durotomy During Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Thomas L Francavilla; Michael C Weiss; Reginald Davis
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-08-31

9.  Suitability of Administrative Databases for Durotomy Incidence Assessment: Comparison to the Incidence Associated With Bone-Removal Devices, Calculated Using a Systemic Literature Review and Clinical Data.

Authors:  Robert Pflugmacher; Angelo Franzini; Shaked Horovitz; Richard Guyer; Ely Ashkenazi
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-31

10.  Effectiveness of Repair Techniques for Spinal Dural Tears: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Elliot H Choi; Alvin Y Chan; Nolan J Brown; Brian V Lien; Ronald Sahyouni; Andrew K Chan; John Roufail; Michael Y Oh
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 2.104

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.