Literature DB >> 21149703

People believe they have more free will than others.

Emily Pronin1, Matthew B Kugler.   

Abstract

Four experiments identify a tendency for people to believe that their own lives are more guided by the tenets of free will than are the lives of their peers. These tenets involve the a priori unpredictability of personal action, the presence of multiple possible paths in a person's future, and the causal power of one's personal desires and intentions in guiding one's actions. In experiment 1, participants viewed their own pasts and futures as less predictable a priori than those of their peers. In experiments 2 and 3, participants thought there were more possible paths (whether good or bad) in their own futures than their peers' futures. In experiment 4, participants viewed their own future behavior, compared with that of their peers, as uniquely driven by intentions and desires (rather than personality, random features of the situation, or history). Implications for the classic actor-observer bias, for debates about free will, and for perceptions of personal responsibility are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21149703      PMCID: PMC3012523          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1012046108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  10 in total

1.  Conscious intention and motor cognition.

Authors:  Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Reasoning about social conflicts improves into old age.

Authors:  Igor Grossmann; Jinkyung Na; Michael E W Varnum; Denise C Park; Shinobu Kitayama; Richard E Nisbett
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Illusion and well-being: a social psychological perspective on mental health.

Authors:  S E Taylor; J D Brown
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Everyday magical powers: the role of apparent mental causation in the overestimation of personal influence.

Authors:  Emily Pronin; Daniel M Wegner; Kimberly McCarthy; Sylvia Rodriguez
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2006-08

Review 5.  The correspondence bias.

Authors:  D T Gilbert; P S Malone
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Feeling "holier than thou": are self-serving assessments produced by errors in self- or social prediction?

Authors:  N Epley; D Dunning
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2000-12

7.  The actor-observer asymmetry in attribution: a (surprising) meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bertram F Malle
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  Culture and development of everyday social explanation.

Authors:  J G Miller
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1984-05

9.  Alone in a crowd of sheep: asymmetric perceptions of conformity and their roots in an introspection illusion.

Authors:  Emily Pronin; Jonah Berger; Sarah Molouki
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2007-04

Review 10.  How we see ourselves and how we see others.

Authors:  Emily Pronin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 47.728

  10 in total
  10 in total

1.  A Proposal for a Scientifically-Informed and Instrumentalist Account of Free Will and Voluntary Action.

Authors:  Eric Racine
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-05-17

Review 2.  What is unrealistic optimism?

Authors:  Anneli Jefferson; Lisa Bortolotti; Bojana Kuzmanovic
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2016-11-01

3.  Free to help? An experiment on free will belief and altruism.

Authors:  Job Harms; Kellie Liket; John Protzko; Vera Schölmerich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Free Will and the Brain Disease Model of Addiction: The Not So Seductive Allure of Neuroscience and Its Modest Impact on the Attribution of Free Will to People with an Addiction.

Authors:  Eric Racine; Sebastian Sattler; Alice Escande
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-11-01

Review 5.  Are mental disorders related to disbelief in free will? A systematic review.

Authors:  Maria E Moreira-de-Oliveira; Gabriela B de Menezes; Samara Dos Santos-Ribeiro; Luana D Laurito; Ana P Ribeiro; Adrian Carter; Leonardo F Fontenelle
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2021-03-16

6.  The Weakness of Will: The Role of Free Will in Treatment Adherence.

Authors:  Fisseha Zewdu Amdie; Monakshi Sawhney; Kevin Woo
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 2.314

7.  Obligation or Desire: Variation in Motivation for Compliance With COVID-19 Public Health Guidance.

Authors:  Ting Ai; Glenn Adams; Xian Zhao
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-07-06

8.  It's not my fault: postdictive modulation of intentional binding by monetary gains and losses.

Authors:  Keisuke Takahata; Hidehiko Takahashi; Takaki Maeda; Satoshi Umeda; Tetsuya Suhara; Masaru Mimura; Motoichiro Kato
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  The psychology of volition.

Authors:  Chris Frith
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Laypersons' Beliefs and Intuitions About Free Will and Determinism: New Insights Linking the Social Psychology and Experimental Philosophy Paradigms.

Authors:  Gilad Feldman; Subramanya Prasad Chandrashekar
Journal:  Soc Psychol Personal Sci       Date:  2017-07-25
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.