Wilmer Tezara1, Rita Colombo, Ilsa Coronel, Oranys Marín. 1. Centro de Botánica Tropical, Instituto de Biología Experimental, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas 1041-A, Venezuela. wilmer.tezara@ciens.ucv.ve
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Calotropis procera and Calotropis gigantea, originally from warm parts of Africa and Asia, are now pan-tropical and in ecological terms considered an indicator of overgrazed, disturbed lands; they grow successfully in dry areas. Variations in water relations, morphology and photosynthesis of the two species growing in the same habitat were studied to assess possible mechanisms of tolerance to drought and how these relate to their ecophysiological success. Also the hypothesis that their photosynthetic rate (A) under drought would be affected by stomatal and non-stomatal limitations was tested. METHODS: Water relations, gas exchange, water use efficiency (WUE), fluorescence parameters, pubescence and specific leaf area (SLA) of Calotropis procera and C. gigantea plants growing in the field were evaluated during the wet (WS) and dry (DS) seasons. RESULTS: The xylem water potential (ψ) was similar in both species during the WS and DS; drought caused a 28 % decrease of ψ. In C. procera, A, stomatal conductance (g(s)) and carboxylation efficiency (CE) were higher in the WS with half the values of those during the DS, this species being more affected by drought than C. gigantea. A high δ(13)C of C. gigantea (-26·2 ‰) in the WS indicated a higher integrated WUE, in agreement with its lower g(s). Leaves of C. gigantea were more pubescent than C. procera. Relative stomatal and non-stomatal limitation of A increased with drought in both species; no changes in maximum quantum yield of photosystem II (PSII; F(v)/F(m)) were observed. The decrease in the relative quantum yield of PSII (ϕ(PSII)) and in the photochemical quenching coefficient (q(P)) was more pronounced in C. procera than in C. gigantea. CONCLUSIONS: The photosynthetic capacity of C. procera was higher than that of C. gigantea. During the DS, A was regulated by stomatal and non-stomatal factors in a coordinated manner and drought did not cause chronic photoinhibition. A higher density of trichomes and leaf angle in C. gigantea may contribute to the maintenance of A and confer more efficient protection of photochemical activity in the DS. Ecophysiological traits such as high photosynthetic rate throughout the year even during the DS, and high WUE, highly pubescent leaves and low SLA observed in both species contribute to the establishment and growth of Calotropis in dry conditions.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Calotropis procera and Calotropis gigantea, originally from warm parts of Africa and Asia, are now pan-tropical and in ecological terms considered an indicator of overgrazed, disturbed lands; they grow successfully in dry areas. Variations in water relations, morphology and photosynthesis of the two species growing in the same habitat were studied to assess possible mechanisms of tolerance to drought and how these relate to their ecophysiological success. Also the hypothesis that their photosynthetic rate (A) under drought would be affected by stomatal and non-stomatal limitations was tested. METHODS:Water relations, gas exchange, water use efficiency (WUE), fluorescence parameters, pubescence and specific leaf area (SLA) of Calotropis procera and C. gigantea plants growing in the field were evaluated during the wet (WS) and dry (DS) seasons. RESULTS: The xylem water potential (ψ) was similar in both species during the WS and DS; drought caused a 28 % decrease of ψ. In C. procera, A, stomatal conductance (g(s)) and carboxylation efficiency (CE) were higher in the WS with half the values of those during the DS, this species being more affected by drought than C. gigantea. A high δ(13)C of C. gigantea (-26·2 ‰) in the WS indicated a higher integrated WUE, in agreement with its lower g(s). Leaves of C. gigantea were more pubescent than C. procera. Relative stomatal and non-stomatal limitation of A increased with drought in both species; no changes in maximum quantum yield of photosystem II (PSII; F(v)/F(m)) were observed. The decrease in the relative quantum yield of PSII (ϕ(PSII)) and in the photochemical quenching coefficient (q(P)) was more pronounced in C. procera than in C. gigantea. CONCLUSIONS: The photosynthetic capacity of C. procera was higher than that of C. gigantea. During the DS, A was regulated by stomatal and non-stomatal factors in a coordinated manner and drought did not cause chronic photoinhibition. A higher density of trichomes and leaf angle in C. gigantea may contribute to the maintenance of A and confer more efficient protection of photochemical activity in the DS. Ecophysiological traits such as high photosynthetic rate throughout the year even during the DS, and high WUE, highly pubescent leaves and low SLA observed in both species contribute to the establishment and growth of Calotropis in dry conditions.
Authors: Maria R V Coêlho; Rebeca Rivas; José R C Ferreira-Neto; João P Bezerra-Neto; Valesca Pandolfi; Ana Maria Benko-Iseppon; Mauro G Santos Journal: Physiol Mol Biol Plants Date: 2021-02-20
Authors: A C Nölscher; A M Yañez-Serrano; S Wolff; A Carioca de Araujo; J V Lavrič; J Kesselmeier; J Williams Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2016-01-22 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Mohammed Z Mutwakil; Nahid H Hajrah; Ahmed Atef; Sherif Edris; Mernan J Sabir; Areej K Al-Ghamdi; Meshaal J S M Sabir; Charlotte Nelson; Rania M Makki; Hani M Ali; Fotouh M El-Domyati; Abdulrahman S M Al-Hajar; Yoann Gloaguen; Hassan S Al-Zahrani; Jamal S M Sabir; Robert K Jansen; Ahmed Bahieldin; Neil Hall Journal: BMC Plant Biol Date: 2017-12-04 Impact factor: 4.215