Literature DB >> 21148280

Molecular characterization of enterovirus 71 and coxsackievirus A16 using the 5' untranslated region and VP1 region.

Fei Zhou1,2, Fanrong Kong2, Bin Wang3, Kenneth McPhie2, Gwendolyn L Gilbert1,2, Dominic E Dwyer1,2.   

Abstract

Enterovirus 71 (EV71) and coxsackievirus A16 (CVA16) are members of the species Human enterovirus A, and are both major and independent aetiological agents of hand-foot-and-mouth disease. The human enterovirus (HEV) 5' untranslated region (UTR) is fundamentally important for efficient virus replication and for virulence, whilst the VP1 region correlates well with antigenic typing by neutralization, and can be used for virus identification and evolutionary studies. A comparison was undertaken of the 5'UTR and VP1 nucleotide sequences of five EV71 clinical isolates and 10 CVA16 clinical isolates from one laboratory with the 5'UTR and VP1 sequences of 104 EV71 strains and 45 CVA16 strains available in GenBank. The genetic relationships were analysed using standard phylogenetic methods. The EV71 phylogenetic analysis showed that the VP1 sequences were clustered into three genogroups, A, B and C, with genogroups B and C further divided into five subgenogroups, B1-B5 and C1-C5, respectively. All EV71 strains were clustered similarly in the 5'UTR and VP1 trees, except for one Taiwanese strain, which demonstrated different clustering in the two trees, suggesting a recombination event in the phylogeny. The CVA16 phylogenetic analysis showed that the VP1 sequences were clustered into two genogroups, A and B, with genogroup B further divided into B1 (B1a and B1b), B2 and a possible B3; and that a similar pattern and grouping of all strains were displayed in the 5'UTR tree. This study demonstrated that comparing the two regions provides evidence of epidemiological linkage of HEV-A strains, and that mutation in the two regions plays a vital role in the evolution of these viruses. The combination of molecular typing and phylogenetic sequence analysis will be beneficial in both individual patient diagnosis and public health measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21148280     DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.025056-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Microbiol        ISSN: 0022-2615            Impact factor:   2.472


  14 in total

1.  Clinical Features and Peripheral Blood T Lymphocyte Subsets in Hand, Foot, and Mouth Disease According to Different Pathogens.

Authors:  Jian-Fang Zhou; Zhi-Yong Chen; Shan-Ming Yang; Jia-Zhen Chen; Ling-Ye Zhou; Ya-Fen Wang; Gang Wang; Xia-Jian Yu; Wen-Hong Zhang
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 2.  Coxsackievirus A16: epidemiology, diagnosis, and vaccine.

Authors:  Qunying Mao; Yiping Wang; Xin Yao; Lianlian Bian; Xing Wu; Miao Xu; Zhenglun Liang
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Development and characterization of a clinical strain of Coxsackievirus A16 and an eGFP infectious clone.

Authors:  Chenglin Deng; Xiaodan Li; Siqing Liu; Linlin Xu; Hanqing Ye; Cheng-Feng Qin; Bo Zhang
Journal:  Virol Sin       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 4.327

4.  Genetic characteristics of the P1 coding region of Coxsackievirus A16 associated with hand, foot, and mouth disease in China.

Authors:  Li Xu; Dawei Cui; Lei Wang; Jun Cheng; Changgui Sun; Lanjuan Li; Hongcui Cao
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 2.316

5.  Development and evaluation of reverse transcription-loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for rapid detection of enterovirus 71.

Authors:  Weifeng Shi; Kun Li; Yun Ji; Qingbo Jiang; Mei Shi; Zuhuang Mi
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 3.090

Review 6.  Enterovirus 71 infection and vaccines.

Authors:  Eun-Je Yi; Yun-Ju Shin; Jeong-Hwan Kim; Tae-Gyun Kim; Sun-Young Chang
Journal:  Clin Exp Vaccine Res       Date:  2017-01-25

7.  A complex mosaic of enteroviruses shapes community-acquired hand, foot and mouth disease transmission and evolution within a single hospital.

Authors:  Joanna C A Cobbin; Philip N Britton; Rebecca Burrell; Deepali Thosar; Kierrtana Selvakumar; John-Sebastian Eden; Cheryl A Jones; Edward C Holmes
Journal:  Virus Evol       Date:  2018-07-13

8.  Seroprevalence of antibodies to enterovirus 71 and coxsackievirus A16 among people of various age groups in a northeast province of Thailand.

Authors:  Hatairat Lerdsamran; Jarunee Prasertsopon; Anek Mungaomklang; Chompunuch Klinmalai; Pirom Noisumdaeng; Kantima Sangsiriwut; Boonrat Tassaneetrithep; Ratigorn Guntapong; Sopon Iamsirithaworn; Pilaipan Puthavathana
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 4.099

9.  The highly conserved 5' untranslated region as an effective target towards the inhibition of Enterovirus 71 replication by unmodified and appropriate 2'-modified siRNAs.

Authors:  Jun-Xia Deng; Xiao-Jing Nie; Ying-Feng Lei; Chao-Feng Ma; Dong-Liang Xu; Biao Li; Zhi-Kai Xu; Guo-Cheng Zhang
Journal:  J Biomed Sci       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 8.410

10.  Precise genotyping and recombination detection of Enterovirus.

Authors:  Chieh-Hua Lin; Yu-Bin Wang; Shu-Hwa Chen; Chao Agnes Hsiung; Chung-Yen Lin
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.