Literature DB >> 21146469

Drug response profiles to experimental pain are opioid and pain modality specific.

Lindsay L Kindler1, Kimberly T Sibille, Toni L Glover, Roland Staud, Joseph L Riley, Roger B Fillingim.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Given our limited ability to predict analgesic efficacy, further research is needed to understand factors influencing analgesic response patterns. The aim of this study was to better understand the relationship between morphine and butorphanol analgesic efficacy tested against multiple pain modalities within the same individuals. Participants included healthy men (n = 72) and women (n = 67) who underwent thermal, pressure, and ischemic experimental pain testing before and after the double-blind administration of morphine and butorphanol during separate testing sessions. Factor analysis revealed 6 factors with analgesic effects grouped primarily by pain modality and specific to either morphine or butorphanol. Hierarchical cluster analysis of individual factor scores led to 4 distinct drug response profiles. Three groups displayed exceptional analgesic efficacy produced by 1 type of opioid on 1 pain stimulus modality, whereas the fourth drug response profile was characterized by average analgesic efficacy across all pain modalities for both opioids. These findings suggest that opioids with varying efficacy at the μ and κ receptors produce independent effects on unique pain mechanisms and that individual responsiveness for some is dependent on pain mechanism and opioid type, although a subset of the population is moderately responsive to opioids regardless of efficacy of receptor binding or predominant pain mechanism being activated. PERSPECTIVE: This investigation provides a foundation for understanding patterns of opioid efficacy in varying types of pain. Our findings suggest that opioid response patterns are more complex than originally thought with about half of individuals exhibiting opioid and pain modality specific analgesic response profiles.
Copyright © 2011 American Pain Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21146469      PMCID: PMC3052955          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.07.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain        ISSN: 1526-5900            Impact factor:   5.820


  47 in total

1.  Nociceptive responses to high and low rates of noxious cutaneous heating are mediated by different nociceptors in the rat: electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  David C Yeomans; Herbert K Proudfit
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 2.  Quantitative assessment of experimental pain perception: multiple domains of clinical relevance.

Authors:  Robert R Edwards; Eleni Sarlani; Ursula Wesselmann; Roger B Fillingim
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 6.961

3.  A comparative study of oxycodone and morphine in a multi-modal, tissue-differentiated experimental pain model.

Authors:  Camilla Staahl; Lona Louring Christrup; Søren Due Andersen; Lars Arendt-Nielsen; Asbjørn Mohr Drewes
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2006-04-04       Impact factor: 6.961

4.  Can personality traits and gender predict the response to morphine? An experimental cold pain study.

Authors:  Dorit Pud; David Yarnitsky; Elliot Sprecher; Zeev Rogowski; Rivka Adler; Elon Eisenberg
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.931

Review 5.  Butorphanol: effects of a prototypical agonist-antagonist analgesic on kappa-opioid receptors.

Authors:  Stephen Commiskey; Lir-Wan Fan; Ing K Ho; Rob W Rockhold
Journal:  J Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2005-06-08       Impact factor: 3.337

6.  Genetic variance in nociception and its relationship to the potency of morphine-induced analgesia in thermal and chemical tests.

Authors:  Gregory I Elmer; Jeanne O Pieper; Stevens S Negus; James H Woods
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  Testing factorial validity and gender invariance of the pain catastrophizing scale.

Authors:  Joyce L D'Eon; Cheryl A Harris; Jacqueline A Ellis
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2004-08

8.  Morphine responses and experimental pain: sex differences in side effects and cardiovascular responses but not analgesia.

Authors:  Roger B Fillingim; Timothy J Ness; Toni L Glover; Claudia M Campbell; Barbara A Hastie; Donald D Price; Roland Staud
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.820

9.  Morphine can produce analgesia via spinal kappa opioid receptors in the absence of mu opioid receptors.

Authors:  Hiroaki Yamada; Naohito Shimoyama; Ichiro Sora; George R Uhl; Yasuichiro Fukuda; Hideshige Moriya; Megumi Shimoyama
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Competition alters the perception of noxious stimuli in male and female athletes.

Authors:  W F Sternberg; D Bailin; M Grant; R H Gracely
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 6.961

View more
  7 in total

1.  Pain sensitivity subgroups in individuals with spine pain: potential relevance to short-term clinical outcome.

Authors:  Rogelio A Coronado; Joel E Bialosky; Michael E Robinson; Steven Z George
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2014-04-24

2.  Effects of Short-Term Oxycodone Maintenance on Experimental Pain Responses in Physically Dependent Opioid Abusers.

Authors:  Marion A Coe; Paul A Nuzzo; Michelle R Lofwall; Sharon L Walsh
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 5.820

3.  Effects of cold pressor pain on the abuse liability of intranasal oxycodone in male and female prescription opioid abusers.

Authors:  Michelle R Lofwall; Paul A Nuzzo; Sharon L Walsh
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 4.492

4.  Evaluation of Analgesia, Tolerance, and the Mechanism of Action of Morphine-6-O-Sulfate Across Multiple Pain Modalities in Sprague-Dawley Rats.

Authors:  Jai Shankar K Yadlapalli; Navdeep Dogra; Anqi W Walbaum; William D Wessinger; Paul L Prather; Peter A Crooks; Maxim Dobretsov
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 5.108

5.  Individual differences in morphine and butorphanol analgesia: a laboratory pain study.

Authors:  Kimberly T Sibille; Lindsay L Kindler; Toni L Glover; Ricardo D Gonzalez; Roland Staud; Joseph L Riley; Roger B Fillingim
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 3.750

6.  OPRM1, OPRK1, and COMT genetic polymorphisms associated with opioid effects on experimental pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  Kwo Wei David Ho; Margaret R Wallace; Roland Staud; Roger B Fillingim
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 3.550

Review 7.  Peripheral Mechanisms of Ischemic Myalgia.

Authors:  Luis F Queme; Jessica L Ross; Michael P Jankowski
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 5.505

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.