Literature DB >> 9539682

Genetic variance in nociception and its relationship to the potency of morphine-induced analgesia in thermal and chemical tests.

Gregory I Elmer1, Jeanne O Pieper, Stevens S Negus, James H Woods.   

Abstract

The perceived intensity of a painful stimulus is determined in part by the stimulus intensity and environmental conditions. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of genetic factors in nociception and its contribution to the potency of morphine to produce antinociception. Eight inbred strains of mice were tested across a range of stimulus intensities in thermal (hot plate) and chemical irritant (acetic acid) nociceptive tests. Stimulus intensities in the thermal test included hot plate temperatures of 51, 53, 55, 57 and 59 degrees C. Stimulus intensities in the chemical irritant test included acetic acid concentrations of 0.1, 0.3 and 0.6%. Linear interpolation of stimulus-effect curves revealed large genotype-dependent differences in the effective temperature resulting in a 10 s latency on the hot-plate (ET10") and the acetic acid concentration resulting in the same number of writhes as determined by the area under the curve (AUC50). There was no genetic correlation between sensitivity to thermal versus chemical stimuli. Morphine dose response curves were then determined at a fixed stimulus intensity in each test (55 degrees C and 0.6% acetic acid) to determine analgesic ED50 doses for each inbred strain. A significant effect of genotype on relative sensitivity to morphine-induced analgesia in both the thermal and chemical irritant tests was found, however there was no genetic correlation between the potency of morphine in each test. There was an inverse genetic correlation between sensitivity to thermal and chemical stimuli and morphine ED50 values in each respective test. In both tests, strains less sensitive to the nociceptive stimuli were more sensitive to the antinociceptive effects of morphine. Confirmation studies in a separate genetic population confirmed the inverse relationship between hot-plate sensitivity and antinociceptive potency. In summary, this study demonstrated (i) a large degree of genetically-determined variability in sensitivity to painful stimuli, (ii) sensitivity to thermal stimuli (hot-plate) is genetically unrelated to sensitivity to chemical (acetic acid) stimuli, (iii) the mechanism by which morphine produces its antinociceptive effects against thermal stimuli is largely genetically independent of the mechanism by which morphine produces its antinociceptive effects against chemical stimuli, and (iv) inherent differences in sensitivity to painful stimuli may be responsible, in part, for individual differences in the potency of morphine's antinociceptive effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9539682     DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3959(97)00215-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  32 in total

Review 1.  Mu opioids and their receptors: evolution of a concept.

Authors:  Gavril W Pasternak; Ying-Xian Pan
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 25.468

2.  HS014, a selective melanocortin-4 (MC4) receptor antagonist, modulates the behavioral effects of morphine in mice.

Authors:  N Eser Ercil; Ruggero Galici; Robert A Kesterson
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-02-18       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 3.  Pain complaints in patients with fibromyalgia versus chronic fatigue syndrome.

Authors:  L A Bradley; N L McKendree-Smith; G S Alarcón
Journal:  Curr Rev Pain       Date:  2000

4.  Age-dependent and strain-dependent influences of morphine on mouse social investigation behavior.

Authors:  Bruce C Kennedy; Jules B Panksepp; Jenny C Wong; Emily J Krause; Garet P Lahvis
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.293

5.  Functional interactions between tumor and peripheral nerve: morphology, algogen identification, and behavioral characterization of a new murine model of cancer pain.

Authors:  P W Wacnik; L J Eikmeier; T R Ruggles; M L Ramnaraine; B K Walcheck; A J Beitz; G L Wilcox
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  The genetic mediation of individual differences in sensitivity to pain and its inhibition.

Authors:  J S Mogil
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  4-Caffeoyl-1,5-quinide in roasted coffee inhibits [3H]naloxone binding and reverses anti-nociceptive effects of morphine in mice.

Authors:  Tomas de Paulis; Patricia Commers; Adriana Farah; Jiali Zhao; Michael P McDonald; Ruggero Galici; Peter R Martin
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2004-04-16       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Qualitative differences between C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice in morphine potentiation of brain stimulation reward and intravenous self-administration.

Authors:  Greg I Elmer; Jeanne O Pieper; Lindsey R Hamilton; Roy A Wise
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Identification of candidate genes and gene networks specifically associated with analgesic tolerance to morphine.

Authors:  Jenica D Tapocik; Noah Letwin; Cheryl L Mayo; Bryan Frank; Troung Luu; Ovokeraye Achinike; Carrie House; Russell Williams; Greg I Elmer; Norman H Lee
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Cannabinoid-mediated diversity of antinociceptive efficacy of parecoxib in Wistar and Sprague Dawley rats in the chronic constriction injury model of neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Axel Becker; Gerd Geisslinger; Radovan Murín; Gisela Grecksch; Volker Höllt; Andreas Zimmer; Helmut Schröder
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 3.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.