Literature DB >> 21146163

The ecological rationality of delay tolerance: insights from capuchin monkeys.

Elsa Addessi1, Fabio Paglieri, Valentina Focaroli.   

Abstract

Both human and non-human animals often face decisions between options available at different times, and the capacity of delaying gratification has usually been considered one of the features distinguishing humans from other animals. However, this characteristic can widely vary across individuals, species, and types of task and it is still unclear whether it is accounted for by phylogenetic relatedness, feeding ecology, social structure, or metabolic rate. To disentangle these hypotheses, we evaluated temporal preferences in capuchin monkeys, South-American primates that, despite splitting off from human lineage approximately 35 million years ago, show striking behavioural analogies with the great apes. Then, we compared capuchins' performance with that of the other primate species tested so far with the same procedure. Overall, capuchins showed a delay tolerance significantly higher than closely related species, such as marmosets and tamarins, and comparable to that shown by great apes. Capuchins' tool use abilities might explain their comparatively high preference for delayed options in inter-temporal choices. Moreover, as in humans, capuchin females showed a greater delay tolerance than males, possibly because of their less opportunistic foraging style. Thus, our results shed light on the evolutionary origins of self-control supporting explanations of delay tolerance in terms of feeding ecology.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21146163     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  33 in total

1.  Calculated reciprocity? A comparative test with six primate species.

Authors:  Federica Amici; Filippo Aureli; Roger Mundry; Alejandro Sánchez Amaro; Abraham Mesa Barroso; Jessica Ferretti; Josep Call
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 2.163

2.  Why has evolution not selected for perfect self-control?

Authors:  Benjamin Y Hayden
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Nonhuman rationality: a predictive coding perspective.

Authors:  Tzu-Wei Hung
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2021-01-06

4.  Personality structure in brown capuchin monkeys (Sapajus apella): comparisons with chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), orangutans (Pongo spp.), and rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  F Blake Morton; Phyllis C Lee; Hannah M Buchanan-Smith; Sarah F Brosnan; Bernard Thierry; Annika Paukner; Frans B M de Waal; Jane Widness; Jennifer L Essler; Alexander Weiss
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 2.231

Review 5.  After-effects of self-control: The reward responsivity hypothesis.

Authors:  Nicholas J Kelley; Anna J Finley; Brandon J Schmeichel
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Lack of prosociality in great apes, capuchin monkeys and spider monkeys: convergent evidence from two different food distribution tasks.

Authors:  Federica Amici; Elisabetta Visalberghi; Josep Call
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Evolutionary pressures on primate intertemporal choice.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Stevens
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Working and waiting for better rewards: self-control in two monkey species (Cebus apella and Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Theodore A Evans; Bonnie M Perdue; Audrey E Parrish; Michael J Beran
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 1.777

9.  Decision-making flexibility in New Caledonian crows, young children and adult humans in a multi-dimensional tool-use task.

Authors:  Rachael Miller; Romana Gruber; Anna Frohnwieser; Martina Schiestl; Sarah A Jelbert; Russell D Gray; Markus Boeckle; Alex H Taylor; Nicola S Clayton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) can wait, when they choose to: a study with the hybrid delay task.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Theodore A Evans; Fabio Paglieri; Joseph M McIntyre; Elsa Addessi; William D Hopkins
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.084

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.