Soham Roy1, Lee P Smith. 1. Pediatric Otolaryngology, University of Texas-Houston School of Medicine, United States. sohamroy0@gmail.com
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Airway fires are a well-described and potentially devastating complication of oropharyngeal surgery. However, the actual factors required to ignite the fire have never been well-delineated in the medical literature. In this study, we used a mechanical model to assess the oxygen parameters necessary to cause an oropharyngeal fire. METHODS: An electrosurgical unit (Bovie) was grounded to a whole raw chicken and a 6.0 endotracheal tube (ETT) was inserted into the cranial end of the degutted central cavity. Oxygen (O(2)) was then titrated through the ETT tube at varying concentrations, with flow rates varying from 10 to 15L/min. Electrocautery (at a setting of 15W) was performed on tissue in the central cavity of the chicken near the ETT. All trials were repeated twice to ensure accuracy. Positive test results were quantified by the time required to obtain ignition of any part of the mechanical setup and time required to produce a sustained flame. A test was considered negative if no ignition could be obtained after four minutes of direct electrocautery. RESULTS: At an O(2) concentration of 100% and a flow rate of 15L/min, ignition with a sustained flame was obtained between 15 and 30s after initiation of electrocautery. At 100% O(2) at 10L/min, ignition was obtained at 70s with immediate sustained flame. At an O(2) concentration of 60%, ignition occurred at 25s and sustained fire after 60s. At an O(2) concentration of 50% ignition with a sustained flame occurred between 128 and 184s. At an O(2) concentration of 45%, neither ignition nor sustained flames could be obtained in any trial. CONCLUSIONS: Operating room fires remain a genuine danger when performing oropharyngeal surgery where electrocautery is performed in an oxygen-enriched environment. In our study, higher O(2) flow rates with higher FiO(2) correlated with quicker ignition in the chicken cavity. A fire was easily obtained when using 100% O(2); as the O(2) concentration decreases, longer exposure to electrocautery is required for ignition. Below 50% O(2) we were unable to obtain ignition. Our study is the first to examine the relative risk of ignition and sustained fire in a mechanical model of oropharyngeal surgery. Decreasing the fraction of inspired O(2) (FiO(2)) to less than 50% may substantially decrease the risk of airway fire during oropharyngeal surgery. Copyright Â
INTRODUCTION: Airway fires are a well-described and potentially devastating complication of oropharyngeal surgery. However, the actual factors required to ignite the fire have never been well-delineated in the medical literature. In this study, we used a mechanical model to assess the oxygen parameters necessary to cause an oropharyngeal fire. METHODS: An electrosurgical unit (Bovie) was grounded to a whole raw chicken and a 6.0 endotracheal tube (ETT) was inserted into the cranial end of the degutted central cavity. Oxygen (O(2)) was then titrated through the ETT tube at varying concentrations, with flow rates varying from 10 to 15L/min. Electrocautery (at a setting of 15W) was performed on tissue in the central cavity of the chicken near the ETT. All trials were repeated twice to ensure accuracy. Positive test results were quantified by the time required to obtain ignition of any part of the mechanical setup and time required to produce a sustained flame. A test was considered negative if no ignition could be obtained after four minutes of direct electrocautery. RESULTS: At an O(2) concentration of 100% and a flow rate of 15L/min, ignition with a sustained flame was obtained between 15 and 30s after initiation of electrocautery. At 100% O(2) at 10L/min, ignition was obtained at 70s with immediate sustained flame. At an O(2) concentration of 60%, ignition occurred at 25s and sustained fire after 60s. At an O(2) concentration of 50% ignition with a sustained flame occurred between 128 and 184s. At an O(2) concentration of 45%, neither ignition nor sustained flames could be obtained in any trial. CONCLUSIONS: Operating room fires remain a genuine danger when performing oropharyngeal surgery where electrocautery is performed in an oxygen-enriched environment. In our study, higher O(2) flow rates with higher FiO(2) correlated with quicker ignition in the chicken cavity. A fire was easily obtained when using 100% O(2); as the O(2) concentration decreases, longer exposure to electrocautery is required for ignition. Below 50% O(2) we were unable to obtain ignition. Our study is the first to examine the relative risk of ignition and sustained fire in a mechanical model of oropharyngeal surgery. Decreasing the fraction of inspired O(2) (FiO(2)) to less than 50% may substantially decrease the risk of airway fire during oropharyngeal surgery. Copyright Â
Authors: Jason M Samuels; Heather Carmichael; Krzysztof J Wikiel; Thomas N Robinson; Carlton C Barnett; Teresa S Jones; Edward L Jones Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2019-06-20 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Tommaso Collarile; Nicola Di Girolamo; Giordano Nardini; Ivano Antonio Ciraci; Paolo Selleri Journal: BMC Vet Res Date: 2012-09-26 Impact factor: 2.741