Literature DB >> 23239908

Thinking in three's: changing surgical patient safety practices in the complex modern operating room.

Verna C Gibbs1.   

Abstract

The three surgical patient safety events, wrong site surgery, retained surgical items (RSI) and surgical fires are rare occurrences and thus their effects on the complex modern operating room (OR) are difficult to study. The likelihood of occurrence and the magnitude of risk for each of these surgical safety events are undefined. Many providers may never have a personal experience with one of these events and training and education on these topics are sparse. These circumstances lead to faulty thinking that a provider won't ever have an event or if one does occur the provider will intuitively know what to do. Surgeons are not preoccupied with failure and tend to usually consider good outcomes, which leads them to ignore or diminish the importance of implementing and following simple safety practices. These circumstances contribute to the persistent low level occurrence of these three events and to the difficulty in generating sufficient interest to resource solutions. Individual facilities rarely have the time or talent to understand these events and develop lasting solutions. More often than not, even the most well meaning internal review results in a new line to a policy and some rigorous enforcement mandate. This approach routinely fails and is another reason why these problems are so persistent. Vigilance actions alone have been unsuccessful so hospitals now have to take a systematic approach to implementing safer processes and providing the resources for surgeons and other stakeholders to optimize the OR environment. This article discusses standardized processes of care for mitigation of injury or outright prevention of wrong site surgery, RSI and surgical fires in an action-oriented framework illustrating the strategic elements important in each event and focusing on the responsibilities for each of the three major OR agents-anesthesiologists, surgeons and nurses. A Surgical Patient Safety Checklist is discussed that incorporates the necessary elements to bring these team members together and influence the emergence of a safer OR.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complex adaptive systems; Retained foreign bodies; Retained foreign objects; Retained surgical items; Safety checklist; Surgical fires; Surgical patient safety; Wrong site surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23239908      PMCID: PMC3520159          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i46.6712

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  20 in total

1.  Effectiveness of a radiofrequency detection system as an adjunct to manual counting protocols for tracking surgical sponges: a prospective trial of 2,285 patients.

Authors:  Christopher C Rupp; Mary J Kagarise; Stella M Nelson; Allison M Deal; Susan Phillips; Janet Chadwick; Tamara Petty; Anthony A Meyer; Hong Jin Kim
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  New recommendations for prevention of surgical fires.

Authors:  Donna S Watson
Journal:  AORN J       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 0.676

3.  What is value in health care?

Authors:  Michael E Porter
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Prevention of 3 "never events" in the operating room: fires, gossypiboma, and wrong-site surgery.

Authors:  Hamid R Zahiri; Jeffrey Stromberg; Hadas Skupsky; Erin K Knepp; Matthew Folstein; Ronald Silverman; Devinder Singh
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2010-12-27       Impact factor: 2.058

Review 5.  Preventable errors in the operating room: retained foreign bodies after surgery--Part I.

Authors:  Verna C Gibbs; Fergus D Coakley; H David Reines
Journal:  Curr Probl Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 6.  Achieving the National Quality Forum's "Never Events": prevention of wrong site, wrong procedure, and wrong patient operations.

Authors:  Robert K Michaels; Martin A Makary; Yasser Dahab; Frank J Frassica; Eugenie Heitmiller; Lisa C Rowen; Richard Crotreau; Henry Brem; Peter J Pronovost
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Practice advisory for the prevention and management of operating room fires.

Authors:  Robert A Caplan; Steven J Barker; Richard T Connis; Charles Cowles; Albert L de Richemond; Jan Ehrenwerth; David G Nickinovich; Donna Pritchard; David Roberson; Gerald L Wolf
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  Learning to live with complexity.

Authors:  Gökçe Sargut; Rita Gunther McGrath
Journal:  Harv Bus Rev       Date:  2011-09

9.  Crisis checklists for the operating room: development and pilot testing.

Authors:  John E Ziewacz; Alexander F Arriaga; Angela M Bader; William R Berry; Lizabeth Edmondson; Judith M Wong; Stuart R Lipsitz; David L Hepner; Sarah Peyre; Steven Nelson; Daniel J Boorman; Douglas S Smink; Stanley W Ashley; Atul A Gawande
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2011-06-11       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 10.  Wrong-site surgery: can we prevent it?

Authors:  John R Clarke; Janet Johnston; Mary Blanco; Denise P Martindell
Journal:  Adv Surg       Date:  2008
View more
  6 in total

1.  The effect of intraoral suction on oxygen-enriched surgical environments: a mechanism for reducing the risk of surgical fires.

Authors:  Andrea M VanCleave; James E Jones; James D McGlothlin; Mark A Saxen; Brian J Sanders; LaQuia A Vinson
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2014

2.  Position-related injury is uncommon in robotic gynecologic surgery.

Authors:  Michael A Ulm; Nicole D Fleming; Vijayashri Rallapali; Mark F Munsell; Pedro T Ramirez; Shannon N Westin; Alpa M Nick; Kathleen M Schmeler; Pamela T Soliman
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 3.  Factors involved in dental surgery fires: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Andrea M VanCleave; James E Jones; James D McGlothlin; Mark A Saxen; Brian J Sanders; LaQuia A Walker
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2014

4.  Implementation of minimal invasive gynaecological surgery certification will challenge gynaecologists with new legal and ethical issues.

Authors:  V Tanos; R Socolov; P Demetriou; M Kyprianou; A Watrelot; Y Van Belle; R Campo
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2016-06-27

5.  Compliance with a time-out procedure intended to prevent wrong surgery in hospitals: results of a national patient safety programme in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Steffie M van Schoten; Veerle Kop; Carolien de Blok; Peter Spreeuwenberg; Peter P Groenewegen; Cordula Wagner
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Experience of a Tertiary-Level Urology Center in the Clinical Urological Events of Rare and Very Rare Incidence. I. Surgical Never Events: 3. Urological Electrosurgical Never Events.

Authors:  Rabea A Gadelkareem
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2018-06-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.