Literature DB >> 21144509

Single-gene testing combined with single nucleotide polymorphism microarray preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy: a novel approach in optimizing pregnancy outcome.

Paul R Brezina1, Andrew Benner, Svetlana Rechitsky, Anver Kuliev, Ekaterina Pomerantseva, Dana Pauling, William G Kearns.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe a method of amplifying DNA from blastocyst trophectoderm cells (two or three cells) and simultaneously performing 23-chromosome single nucleotide polymorphism microarrays and single-gene preimplantation genetic diagnosis.
DESIGN: Case report.
SETTING: IVF clinic and preimplantation genetic diagnostic centers. PATIENT(S): A 36-year-old woman, gravida 2, para 1011, and her husband who both were carriers of GM(1) gangliosidosis. The couple wished to proceed with microarray analysis for aneuploidy detection coupled with DNA sequencing for GM(1) gangliosidosis. INTERVENTION(S): An IVF cycle was performed. Ten blastocyst-stage embryos underwent trophectoderm biopsy. Twenty-three-chromosome microarray analysis for aneuploidy and specific DNA sequencing for GM(1) gangliosidosis mutations were performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Viable pregnancy. RESULT(S): After testing, elective single embryo transfer was performed followed by an intrauterine pregnancy with documented fetal cardiac activity by ultrasound. CONCLUSION(S): Twenty-three-chromosome microarray analysis for aneuploidy detection and single-gene evaluation via specific DNA sequencing and linkage analysis are used for preimplantation diagnosis for single-gene disorders and aneuploidy. Because of the minimal amount of genetic material obtained from the day 3 to 5 embryos (up to 6 pg), these modalities have been used in isolation of each other. The use of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy coupled with testing for single-gene disorders via trophectoderm biopsy is a novel approach to maximize pregnancy outcomes. Although further investigation is warranted, preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy and single-gene testing seem destined to be used increasingly to optimize ultimate pregnancy success.
Copyright © 2011 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21144509     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.11.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  20 in total

1.  Twenty-four chromosome FISH in human IVF embryos reveals patterns of post-zygotic chromosome segregation and nuclear organisation.

Authors:  D Ioannou; K G L Fonseka; E J Meershoek; A R Thornhill; A Abogrein; M Ellis; D K Griffin
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) for Monogenic Disorders: the Value of Concurrent Aneuploidy Screening.

Authors:  Kara N Goldman; Taraneh Nazem; Alan Berkeley; Steven Palter; Jamie A Grifo
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 3.  Prenatal and pre-implantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Joris Robert Vermeesch; Thierry Voet; Koenraad Devriendt
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 4.  Recent advances in preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening.

Authors:  Lina Lu; Bo Lv; Kevin Huang; Zhigang Xue; Xianmin Zhu; Guoping Fan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  A review of, and commentary on, the ongoing second clinical introduction of preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) to routine IVF practice.

Authors:  Norbert Gleicher; David H Barad
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 6.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: state of the art 2011.

Authors:  Joyce C Harper; Sioban B Sengupta
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Comparison of array comparative genomic hybridization and quantitative real-time PCR-based aneuploidy screening of blastocyst biopsies.

Authors:  Antonio Capalbo; Nathan R Treff; Danilo Cimadomo; Xin Tao; Kathleen Upham; Filippo Maria Ubaldi; Laura Rienzi; Richard T Scott
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 8.  Genetic considerations in recurrent pregnancy loss.

Authors:  Kassie J Hyde; Danny J Schust
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 6.915

9.  New array approaches to explore single cells genomes.

Authors:  Evelyne Vanneste; Lilach Bittman; Niels Van der Aa; Thierry Voet; Joris Robert Vermeesch
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 10.  Methods for comprehensive chromosome screening of oocytes and embryos: capabilities, limitations, and evidence of validity.

Authors:  Nathan R Treff; Richard T Scott
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.