Literature DB >> 10805048

Influence of self-measurement of blood pressure on the responder rate in hypertensive patients treated with losartan: results of the SVATCH Study. Standard vs Automatic Treatment Control of COSAAR in Hypertension.

W Vetter1, L Hess, R Brignoli.   

Abstract

Home measurement of blood pressure (BP) can improve compliance. The aim of this study was to evaluate if the efficacy of losartan in hypertension could be enhanced by providing patients with a device for home BP measurement. In this open, randomised, prospective, multi-centre study in 244 Swiss practices, patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension were randomised to a group receiving a home BP measuring device (OMRON) (group 2), or to a group where this device was not provided (group 1). After 8 weeks of treatment with losartan, the responder rates between subjects performing home measurement of BP were compared with those without self-measurement, whereby exclusively sphygmomanometric office BP values were considered. A total of 622 subjects completed the study. Treatment with losartan significantly reduced diastolic (DBP) and systolic BP (SBP) (P < 0.0001). Overall, the group with home BP measurement showed an increased responder rate (DBP < or =90 mm Hg) by 6.4% (59.8% vs 66.2%; 0.05 < P < 0.1). This difference was mainly due to female patients (64.1% vs 73.2%), where it reached statistical significance (P < 0.01). Pretreated patients showed a 9.0% improvement of response in the home measurement group as well (0.05 < P < 0.1). The responder rate in newly treated subjects was relatively high, reaching 79.5% (DBP < or =90 mm Hg or reduction > or =10 mm Hg DBP from baseline). However, home measurement did not significantly improve BP control in these new patients (81.4% vs 77.7%). Overall, home measurement can lead to a slight improvement of BP control. This improvement was most evident in females, reaching significance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10805048     DOI: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1000977

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Hypertens        ISSN: 0950-9240            Impact factor:   3.012


  6 in total

Review 1.  Educational and organisational interventions used to improve the management of hypertension in primary care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Tom Fahey; Knut Schroeder; Shah Ebrahim
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  Self-monitoring and other non-pharmacological interventions to improve the management of hypertension in primary care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Liam G Glynn; Andrew W Murphy; Susan M Smith; Knut Schroeder; Tom Fahey
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Self-monitoring of blood pressure for improving adherence to antihypertensive medicines and blood pressure control: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Masumeh Hosseininasab; Zahra Jahangard-Rafsanjani; Abbas Mohagheghi; Amir Sarayani; Arash Rashidian; Mohammadreza Javadi; Alireza Ahmadvand; Molouk Hadjibabaie; Kheirollah Gholami
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 2.689

4.  Blood pressure control by home monitoring: meta-analysis of randomised trials.

Authors:  Francesco P Cappuccio; Sally M Kerry; Lindsay Forbes; Anna Donald
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-06-11

5.  Home blood pressure monitoring with nurse-led telephone support among patients with hypertension and a history of stroke: a community-based randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sally M Kerry; Hugh S Markus; Teck K Khong; Geoffrey C Cloud; Jenny Tulloch; Denise Coster; Judith Ibison; Pippa Oakeshott
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 6.  The applicability of home blood pressure measurement in clinical practice: a review of literature.

Authors:  Willem J Verberk; Abraham A Kroon; Heidi A Jongen-Vancraybex; Peter W de Leeuw
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2007
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.