| Literature DB >> 21144037 |
Robert Byamugisha1, James K Tumwine, Grace Ndeezi, Charles A S Karamagi, Thorkild Tylleskär.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: HIV testing rates have exceeded 90% among the pregnant women at Mbale Regional Referral Hospital in Mbale District, eastern Uganda, since the introduction of routine antenatal counselling and testing for HIV in June 2006. However, no documented information was available about opinions of pregnant women in eastern Uganda about this HIV testing approach. We therefore conducted a study to assess attitudes of antenatal attendees towards routine HIV counselling and testing at Mbale Hospital. We also assessed their knowledge about mother to child transmission of HIV and infant feeding options for HIV-infected mothers.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 21144037 PMCID: PMC3017012 DOI: 10.1186/1758-2652-13-52
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Int AIDS Soc ISSN: 1758-2652 Impact factor: 5.396
Predictors of knowledge of exclusive breastfeeding among 388 new antenatal attendees, Mbale, Uganda; logistic regression results
| Participants' characteristics | Number, n (%) | Exclusive breastfeeding knowledge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unadjusted OR (95% CI) | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | ||
| 15-24 | 220 (56.7) | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 25 or more | 168 (43.3) | 1.1 (0.7-1.7) | 1.5 (0.8-2.5) |
| Rural | 252 (64.9) | 1.0 | |
| Urban | 136 (35.1) | 1.5 (0.9-2.3) | 1.4 (0.9-2.3) |
| Single/divorced/separated | 35 (9.0) | 1.0 | |
| Married/cohabiting | 353 (91.0) | 1.4 (0.7-2.8) | |
| Not getting a salary | 337 (86.9) | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Salaried | 51 (13.1) | 2.6 (1.2-5.6) | 1.9 (0.8-4.5) |
| None or incomplete primary | 134 (34.5) | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Completed primary | 152 (39.2) | 1.5 (0.9-2.4) | 1.6 (1.0-2.7) |
| Completed secondary or more | 102 (26.3) | 2.5 (1.4-4.5) | |
| Christian | 234 (60.3) | 1.0 | |
| Muslim | 154 (39.7) | 1.2 (0.8-1-9) | |
| 1-2 | 201 (51.8) | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 3 or more | 187 (48.2) | 1.5 (1.0-2.3) | |
| Poorest (quintiles: 4th, 5th) | 159 (41.0) | 1.0 | |
| Least poor (quintiles: 1st-3rd) | 229 (59) | 1.3 (0.8-1.9) | |
| Bagisu | 247 (63.7) | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Non-Bagisu | 141 (36.3) | 1.6 (1.0-2.5) | |
| No | 2 (0.5) | ||
| Yes | 386 (99.5) | ||
| No | 6 (1.5) | 1.0 | |
| Yes | 282 (98.5) | 1.9 (0.4-9.8) | |
I. No unadjusted odds ratio was calculated since one of the cells had less than 5 cases.
II. P-value (P) < 0.05 was statistically significant.
III. The goodness-of-fit test (Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients) of the final model was significant [Chi-square statistic (χ2) = 28.249, degrees of freedom (df) = 7, p = 0.000] and the Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test was not significant [χ2 = 5.866, df = 8, p = 0.662] as indicators of model appropriateness.
Participants' opinions and experiences about routine HIV testing among 388 new antenatal attendees, Mbale, Uganda
| Participant's rating of | Responses | |
|---|---|---|
| Very good/good n (%) | Fair/bad/very bad n (%) | |
| the visit to antenatal clinic | 308 (79.4) | 80 (20.6) |
| the handling by clinic staff | 344 (88.7) | 44 (11.3) |
| the total waiting time in clinic | 286 (73.7) | 102 (26.3) |
| the clinic facilities | 322 (83.0) | 66 (17.0) |
| the health education talk | 350 (90.2) | 38 (9.8) |
| the pre-test HIV counselling | 335 (86.3) | 53 (13.7) |
| the post-test HIV counselling | 369 (95.1) | 19 (4.9) |
| the routine HIV testing | 382 (98.5) | 6 (1.5) |
Not long waiting time
Too long waiting time
Participants were asked, "Nowadays in this clinic, all mothers are tested for HIV unless they say no. What do you think about this system?" Responses included "very bad", "bad", "fair", "good" and "very good". The responses, "good" and "very good", were taken as positive attitudes towards routine HIV testing.
Predictors of positive attitude to pre-test HIV counselling among 388 new antenatal attendees, Mbale, Uganda
| Participants' characteristics | Number n (%) | Pre-test HIV counselling positive attitude | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unadjusted OR (95% CI) | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | ||
| 25 or more | 168 (43.3) | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 15-24 | 220 (56.7) | 1.2 (0.7-2.1) | |
| Rural | 252 (64.9) | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Urban | 136 (35.1) | 3.0 (1.4-6.3) | |
| No or incomplete primary | 134 (34.5) | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Completed primary | 152(39.2) | 0.9 (0.5-1.9) | 0.7 (0.4-1.5) |
| Completed secondary or more | 102 (26.3) | 1.8 (0.8-4.2) | 1.3 (0.5-3.5) |
| Non-Bagisu | 141 (36.3) | 1.0 (0.6-1.9) | |
| Bagisu | 247 (63.7) | 1.0 | |
| Poorest (quintiles: 4th-5th) | 159 (41.0) | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Least poor (quintiles: 1st-3rd) | 229 (59.0) | 2.3 (1.3-4.1) | |
| Salaried | 51 (13.1) | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Not getting a salary | 337 (86.9) | 2.8 (0.8-9.3) | 1.8 (0.5-7.0) |
| 1-2 | 201 (51.8) | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 3 or more | 187 (48.2) | 1.5 (0.8-2.3) | |
I. P-value: ‡ = p < 0.05, * = p < 0.01
II. Marital status and religion were not significantly associated with positive attitude to pre- and post-test HIV counselling.
III. The goodness-of-fit test (Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients) of the final model for pre-test counselling positive attitude was significant [Chi-square statistic (χ2) = 17.219, degrees of freedom (df) = 7, p = 0.016] and the Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test was not significant [χ2 = 9.620, df = 8, p = 0.293] as indicators of model appropriateness.
Predictors of male partner permission to test for HIV and positive attitude to HIV testing among 388 new antenatal attendees, Mbale, Uganda
| Participants' characteristics | Number n (%) | Male partner permission to test for HIV | Positive attitude to HIV-testing† | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unadj.OR (95% CI) | Adj.OR (95% CI) | Unadj.OR (95% CI) | Adj.OR (95% CI) | ||
| 15-24 | 220 (56.7) | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.7 (0.5-14.7) | 2.5 (0.3-22.3) |
| 25 or more | 168 (43.3) | 1.2 (0.8-1.8) | 1.0 (0.7-1.6) | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| No or incomplete primary | 134 (34.5) | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||
| Completed primary | 152 (39.2) | 1.2 (0.8-1.9) | 1.2 (0.7-2.0) | ||
| Completed secondary or more | 102 (26.3) | 2.7 (1.5-4.7) | |||
| Poorest (quintiles: 4th-5th) | 159 (41.0) | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Least poor (quintiles: 1st-3rd) | 229 (59.0) | 1.5 (1.0-2.2) | 1.2 (0.7-1.9) | 2.9 (0.5-16.2) | 1.9 (0.3-12.6) |
| Bagisu | 247 (63.7) | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Non-Bagisu | 141 (36.3) | 1.6 (1.0-2.4) | 1.6 (1.0-2.5) | 2.9 (0.3-25.0) | 2.6 (0.3-23.9) |
| Single/divorced/separated | 35 (9.0) | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Married/cohabiting | 353 (91.0) | 4.6 (2.0-10.5) | 2.0 (0.3-18.0) | 5.4 (0.4-73.1) | |
| Christian | 234 (60.3) | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Moslem | 154 (39.7) | 1.3 (0.9-2.0) | 1.4 (0.9-2.2) | 1.3 (0.2-7.3) | 1.2 (0.2-7.0) |
| Not getting a salary | 337 (86.9) | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||
| Salaried | 51 (13.1) | 1.9 (1.0-3.6) | 1.1 (0.5-2.3) | ||
| No or incomplete primary | 134 (34.5) | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||
| Completed primary or more | 254 (65.5) | 3.9 (0.7-21.4) | 2.9 (0.4-19.7) | ||
I. Unadj. OR: Unadjusted Odds Ratio, Adj. OR: Adjusted Odds Ratio, CI: Confidence Interval
II. P-value: *p < 0.01, ‡p < 0.00. P-value < 0.05 was statistically significant.
III. †Pregnant women who had a positive attitude to routine antenatal HIV testing were 98.5%. Hence there were too few cases in some cells giving rise to the wide confidence intervals of the odds ratios and inability to calculate the odds ratio for occupation.
IV. The goodness-of-fit test (Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients) of the final model for male partner permission to test for HIV was significant [Chi-square statistic (χ2) = 41.434, degrees of freedom (df) = 8, p = 0.000] and the Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test was not significant [χ2 = 5.563, df = 8, p = 0.696] as indicators of model appropriateness.
V. The goodness-of-fit test (Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients) of the final model for HIV testing was significant [χ2 = 11.025, df = 8, p = 0.000] and the Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test was not significant [χ2 = 5.637, df = 8, p = 0.688] as indicators of model appropriateness.
Participants' knowledge about mother-to-child transmission of HIV and infant feeding options (N = 388), Mbale, Uganda
| Questions to participants | Correct answer | Correct responses n (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Yes | 296 (76.3) | |
| (2) | ||
| - during pregnancy | Yes | 239 (61.6) |
| - during labour | Yes | 328 (84.5) |
| - through breastfeeding | Yes | 344 (88.7) |
| - other | Yes | 129 (33.2) |
| 1-4 | 226 (58.2) | |
| 1-3 | 147 (37.9) | |
| - taking antiretroviral drugs | Yes | 323 (83.2) |
| - having protected sex with her partner (condom use) | Yes | 177 (45.6) |
| - other ways | Yes | 83 (21.4) |
| Yes | 335 (86.3) | |
| - exclusively breastfeed for 6 months | Yes | 244 (62.9) |
| - not breastfeeding, give infant formula | Yes | 240 (61.9) |
| - not breastfeeding, give diluted cow's milk | Yes | 268 (69.1) |
| - good breast care (no sore or cracked nipples) | Yes | 139 (35.8) |
| - other ways | Yes | 76 (19.6) |
| (8) If you were HIV positive, which infant feeding option would be | ||
| feasible to you? (Give only one answer) | ||
| (a) - infant formula, no breast milk | 45 (11.6) | |
| (b) - cow's milk, no breast milk | 233 (60.1) | |
| (c) - breast milk only for 6 months | 94 (24.2) | |
| (d) - other | 13 (3.4) |
- sharing sharp instruments like needles and injection needles with the baby
- abstaining from sexual intercourse, being faithful to your partner
- using drugs to prevent HIV through breast milk
- breastfeeding for 3 months, then giving either cow's milk or porridge (from soya/millet flour)