OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of a change in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing policy on HIV testing rates in an urban maternity clinic population. METHODS: Since 1995, our institution has provided pretest counseling and voluntary HIV testing to all pregnant women. After the 1999 Institute of Medicine recommendation of HIV testing with patient notification as a routine component of prenatal care, we conducted a prospective study to determine whether this policy would increase our HIV screening rates. The intervention incorporated HIV testing into the routine battery of tests drawn at antenatal care. Not to be tested required active refusal. The intervention group was comprised of all women receiving an initial antenatal visit in one of our eight maternity clinics between August 1, 1999, and July 30, 2000. The control group was comprised of all women presenting for prenatal care in the same clinics during the year before the intervention. RESULTS: The 3415 women in the intervention group and 3778 controls were similar with respect to most demographic and risk factors. After the intervention, HIV testing increased from 75% to 88% (P <.001). Among all women in both years of the study, women who were in the intervention group, less than 20 years of age, or who had a history of substance abuse, were more likely not to refuse testing. CONCLUSION: After implementation of a policy of routine HIV testing with active patient refusal, HIV testing rates increased among pregnant women in our large, urban obstetric clinic population.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of a change in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing policy on HIV testing rates in an urban maternity clinic population. METHODS: Since 1995, our institution has provided pretest counseling and voluntary HIV testing to all pregnant women. After the 1999 Institute of Medicine recommendation of HIV testing with patient notification as a routine component of prenatal care, we conducted a prospective study to determine whether this policy would increase our HIV screening rates. The intervention incorporated HIV testing into the routine battery of tests drawn at antenatal care. Not to be tested required active refusal. The intervention group was comprised of all women receiving an initial antenatal visit in one of our eight maternity clinics between August 1, 1999, and July 30, 2000. The control group was comprised of all women presenting for prenatal care in the same clinics during the year before the intervention. RESULTS: The 3415 women in the intervention group and 3778 controls were similar with respect to most demographic and risk factors. After the intervention, HIV testing increased from 75% to 88% (P <.001). Among all women in both years of the study, women who were in the intervention group, less than 20 years of age, or who had a history of substance abuse, were more likely not to refuse testing. CONCLUSION: After implementation of a policy of routine HIV testing with active patient refusal, HIV testing rates increased among pregnant women in our large, urban obstetric clinic population.
Authors: Alexander C Tsai; David R Bangsberg; Nneka Emenyonu; Jude K Senkungu; Jeffrey N Martin; Sheri D Weiser Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2011-10-10 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Christopher S Krawczyk; Ellen Funkhouser; J Michael Kilby; Richard A Kaslow; Amita K Bey; Sten H Vermund Journal: South Med J Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 0.954
Authors: Michael S Lyons; Christopher J Lindsell; Carl J Fichtenbaum; Carlos A Camargo Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2007 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Winfreda Chandisarewa; Lynda Stranix-Chibanda; Elizabeth Chirapa; Anna Miller; Micah Simoyi; Agnes Mahomva; Yvonne Maldonado; Avinash K Shetty Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 9.408