Literature DB >> 21141429

A re-examination of ambient air ozone monitor interferences.

Chester W Spicer1, Darrell W Joseph, Will M Ollison.   

Abstract

Attaining the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for ozone (O3) could cost billions of dollars nationwide. Attainment of the NAAQS is judged on O3 measurements made by the Federal Reference Method (FRM), ethylene chemiluminescence, or a Federal Equivalent Method (FEM), predominantly ultraviolet (UV) absorption. Starting in the 1980s, FRM monitors were replaced by FEMs so that today virtually all monitoring in the United States uses the UV methodology. This report summarizes a laboratory and collocated ambient air monitoring study of interferences in O3 monitors. Potential interferences examined in the laboratory included water vapor, mercury, o-nitrophenol, naphthalene, p-tolualdehyde, and mixed reaction products from smog chamber simulations of urban atmospheric photochemistry. UV absorption O3 monitors modified for humidity equilibration were also collocated with UV FEM O3 monitors at six sites in Houston, TX, during the 2007 summer O3 season. The results suggest that humidity and interfering species can positively bias (overestimate) O3 measured by FEM monitors used to determine compliance with the O3 standards. The results also suggest that humidity equilibration can mitigate this bias.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21141429     DOI: 10.3155/1047-3289.60.11.1353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc        ISSN: 1096-2247            Impact factor:   2.235


  4 in total

1.  Multi-pollutant mobile platform measurements of air pollutants adjacent to a major roadway.

Authors:  Erin A Riley; Lyndsey Banks; Jonathan Fintzi; Timothy R Gould; Kris Hartin; LaNae Schaal; Mark Davey; Lianne Sheppard; Timothy Larson; Michael G Yost; Christopher D Simpson
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 4.798

2.  Influence of temperature changes on ambient air NOx chemiluminescence measurements.

Authors:  Marta Doval Miñarro; Enrique González Ferradás; Francisco J Marzal Martínez
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Comparison of ozone measurement methods in biomass burning smoke: an evaluation under field and laboratory conditions.

Authors:  Russell W Long; Andrew Whitehill; Andrew Habel; Shawn Urbanski; Hannah Halliday; Maribel Colón; Surender Kaushik; Matthew S Landis
Journal:  Atmos Meas Tech       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  The impact of the 2016 Fort McMurray Horse River Wildfire on ambient air pollution levels in the Athabasca Oil Sands Region, Alberta, Canada.

Authors:  Matthew S Landis; Eric S Edgerton; Emily M White; Gregory R Wentworth; Amy P Sullivan; Ann M Dillner
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-11-04       Impact factor: 7.963

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.