Literature DB >> 21139706

The need for validation of large administrative databases: Veterans Health Administration ICD-9CM coding of exudative age-related macular degeneration and ranibizumab usage.

Paul Latkany, Mona Duggal, Joseph Goulet, Hyung Paek, Michael Rambo, Philip Palmisano, Woody Levin, Joseph Erdos, Amy Justice, Cynthia Brandt.   

Abstract

We performed a validation study by chart review of data for exudative age-related macular degeneration (eAMD) and, because of the Veterans Administration (VA) therapy policy, ranibizumab usage in the largest electronic medical record system in the USA. We reviewed 5,854 distinct patients who visited an ophthalmology clinic within VA Connecticut from January 2006-December 2008. We randomly selected 98 of 138 distinct eAMD patients and 265 of 5,588 non-eAMD patients who did not receive ranibizumab. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification coding of eAMD had an excellent positive predictive value of 97.8% (95% confidence interval (CI), 93.5-99.4%). The national Decision Support System (DSS) had an excellent positive predictive value of 100% (95% CI, 79.9-100%) for ranibizumab. However, the negative predictive value of the DSS dispensed ranibizumab decreased to 67.5 (95% CI, 62.1-72.4) because of a change in the way local values were stored that led to errors. Therefore, validation of clinical information over time in large databases is necessary.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age-related macular degeneration; Informatics; Ranibizumab; Validation study

Year:  2010        PMID: 21139706      PMCID: PMC2956455          DOI: 10.1007/s12177-010-9052-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ocul Biol Dis Infor        ISSN: 1936-8437


  17 in total

1.  Veteran's affairs hospital discharge databases coded serious bacterial infections accurately.

Authors:  Sebastian Schneeweiss; Ari Robicsek; Richard Scranton; Dan Zuckerman; Daniel H Solomon
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2006-12-18       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 2.  Age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Rama D Jager; William F Mieler; Joan W Miller
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Use of insurance claims databases to evaluate the outcomes of ophthalmic surgery.

Authors:  A L Coleman; H Morgenstern
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.048

4.  Risk factors for retinal detachment after cataract surgery. A population-based case-control study.

Authors:  J M Tielsch; M W Legro; S D Cassard; O D Schein; J C Javitt; A E Singer; E B Bass; E P Steinberg
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Measuring diagnoses: ICD code accuracy.

Authors:  Kimberly J O'Malley; Karon F Cook; Matt D Price; Kimberly Raiford Wildes; John F Hurdle; Carol M Ashton
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  A state-of-the-art conference on databases pertaining to veterans' health. A resource for research and decision making.

Authors:  C M Ashton; T J Menke; D Deykin; L C Camberg; M P Charns
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Veterans Aging Cohort Study (VACS): Overview and description.

Authors:  Amy C Justice; Elizabeth Dombrowski; Joseph Conigliaro; Shawn L Fultz; Deborah Gibson; Tamra Madenwald; Joseph Goulet; Michael Simberkoff; Adeel A Butt; David Rimland; Maria C Rodriguez-Barradas; Cynthia L Gibert; Kris Ann K Oursler; Sheldon Brown; David A Leaf; Matthew B Goetz; Kendall Bryant
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Accuracy of coding in Medicare part B claims. Cataract as a case study.

Authors:  J C Javitt; A M McBean; S S Sastry; F DiPaolo
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-05

9.  Economic evaluation of blind rehabilitation for veterans with macular diseases in the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Authors:  Kevin T Stroupe; Joan A Stelmack; X Charlene Tang; Domenic J Reda; D'Anna Moran; Stephen Rinne; Rickilyn Mancil; Yongliang Wei; Roger Cummings; Gary Mancil; Nancy Ellis; Robert W Massof
Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.648

10.  Age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Hanna R Coleman; Chi-Chao Chan; Frederick L Ferris; Emily Y Chew
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-11-22       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  3 in total

1.  Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy increase the risk of developing neovascular age-related macular degeneration in later life.

Authors:  Karen Curtin; Lauren H Theilen; Alison Fraser; Ken R Smith; Michael W Varner; Gregory S Hageman
Journal:  Hypertens Pregnancy       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 2.108

Review 2.  Use of health care claims data to study patients with ophthalmologic conditions.

Authors:  Joshua D Stein; Flora Lum; Paul P Lee; William L Rich; Anne L Coleman
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  Gout and the risk of age-related macular degeneration in the elderly.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; John D Cleveland
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.