| Literature DB >> 21139693 |
Takashi Kojima1, Yukihiro Matsumoto, Murat Dogru, Kazuo Tsubota.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the applicability of in vivo laser scanning confocal microscopy as a tool of conjunctival cytology in a prospective case-control study.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 21139693 PMCID: PMC2994731
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Vis ISSN: 1090-0535 Impact factor: 2.367
Comparisons of tear function tests, vital staining scores and squamous metaplasia grades between SS patients and control subjects.
| BUT (s) | 3.1±1.1* | 12.0±2.8 |
| Schirmer test-1 (mm) | 2.8±1.9* | 17.5±1.4 |
| Fluorescein score (pts) | 4.7±2.6* | 0.5±0.9 |
| Rose Bengal score (pts) | 4.3±1.7* | 0.2±0.4 |
| IC squamous metaplasia grade (Nelson’s) | 1.9±0.9* | 0.3±0.4 |
| BUT, tear film break up time; SS, Sjogren syndrome; IC, impression cytology | ||
*p< 0.0001
Figure 1Impression cytology imprints and in vivo confocal microscopy scans from representative Sjogren syndrome patients and control subjects. A: Conjunctival impression cytology imprint showing sheets of epithelial cells with scanty cytoplasm and large nuclei in a 42 year old female control subject. Nelson’s squamous metaplasia grade: 0 Mean MIECA: 308 μm2 Mean N/C: 0.52. B: Imprint from a 38 year old female SS patient shows consistently large epithelial cells with abundant cytoplasm and pyknotic nuclei. Nelson’s squamous metaplasia grade: 2. Mean MIECA: 1799 μm2 Mean N/C: 0.18. C: Confocal microscopy scan showing sheets of densely packed small epithelial cells with large nuclei and scanty cytoplasm in the same control subject. Mean MIECA: 266 μm2 Mean N/C: 0.55. D: Confocal microscopy scan showing enlargement of individual superficial epithelial cells with pyknotic nuclei. Red arrow shows an area of cellular drop out. Mean MIECA: 1490 μm2 Mean N/C: 0.22.
Figure 2Impression cytology imprint and in vivo confocal microscopy scans from a representative Sjogren syndrome patient showing nuclear changes. A: Impression cytology imprint showing nuclear fragmentation and clumping(red arrows). B, C: Confocal microscopy scans showing these nuclear changes (red arrows).
Comparisons of N/C ratios and MIECA values assessed by impression cytology and confocal microscopy between SS patients and control subjects.
| MIECA (μm) | 945±574* | 329±102 | 880±508* | 378±119 |
| N/C ratio | 0.34±0.10* | 0.45±0.05 | 0.34±0.11* | 0.47±0.06 |
| MIECA, mean individual epithelial cell area; N/C, nucleocytoplasmic | ||||
*p< 0.0001
Figure 3The correlation of nucleocytoplasmic (N/C) ratio assessed by impression cytology and in vivo confocal microscopy. Note the linear positive correlation for N/C ratio assessed by both examination techniques.
Figure 4The correlation of mean individual epithelial cell area(MIECA) assessed by impression cytology and in vivo confocal microscopy. Note the linear positive correlation for MIECA assessed by both examination techniques.