Y Qazi1, A Kheirkhah1, C Blackie2, A Cruzat1, M Trinidad1, C Williams1, D R Korb2, P Hamrah1. 1. Ocular Surface Imaging Center, Cornea Service, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 2. Korb Associates, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The utility of in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) in the investigation of palpebral conjunctival and corneal inflammation in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD)-associated refractory dry eye symptoms following gland expression, despite objective clinical improvement. METHODS: A retrospective, observational pilot study was conducted evaluating five patients with MGD-associated refractory dry eye symptoms and three control groups: symptomatic untreated MGD patients (n=3), treatment-responsive MGD patients with improved symptoms (n=3) and asymptomatic healthy normals (n=11). Ocular surface disease index (OSDI) scores, tear break-up time (TBUT), the number of meibomian glands yielding liquid secretion (MGYLS), palpebral conjunctival epithelial and substantia propria immune cell (EIC, SIC), and corneal dendritic cell (DC) densities were measured. RESULTS: Despite clinical improvement (TBUT: 6.4±1.2 s to 10.1±2.1 s, P=0.03; MGYLS: 3.5±0.8 glands to 7.0±1.1 glands, P=0.13) and a normal clinical examination post treatment, MGD patients remained symptomatic. IVCM revealed increased immune cells in the palpebral conjunctiva (refractory MGD EIC=592.6±110.1 cells/mm2 untreated MGD EIC=522.6±104.7 cells/mm2, P=0.69; responsive MGD EIC=194.9±119.4 cells/mm2, P<0.01; normals EIC=123.7±19.2 cells/mm2, P< 0.001), but not the cornea (refractory MGD DC=60.9±28.3 cells/mm2; normals DC=25.9±6.3 cells/mm2; P=0.43). EIC did not correlate with TBUT (Rs=-0.26, P=0.33). OSDI scores correlated with both EIC (Rs=0.76, P<0.001) and TBUT (Rs=-0.69, P<0.01) but not SIC. Intraglandular immune cells were also seen. CONCLUSION: MGD-associated refractory symptoms and the symptom-sign disparity may be explained by clinically non-apparent, active inflammation of the palpebral conjunctiva as detected by IVCM. These patients may benefit from anti-inflammatory therapy.
PURPOSE: The utility of in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) in the investigation of palpebral conjunctival and corneal inflammation in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD)-associated refractory dry eye symptoms following gland expression, despite objective clinical improvement. METHODS: A retrospective, observational pilot study was conducted evaluating five patients with MGD-associated refractory dry eye symptoms and three control groups: symptomatic untreated MGD patients (n=3), treatment-responsive MGD patients with improved symptoms (n=3) and asymptomatic healthy normals (n=11). Ocular surface disease index (OSDI) scores, tear break-up time (TBUT), the number of meibomian glands yielding liquid secretion (MGYLS), palpebral conjunctival epithelial and substantia propria immune cell (EIC, SIC), and corneal dendritic cell (DC) densities were measured. RESULTS: Despite clinical improvement (TBUT: 6.4±1.2 s to 10.1±2.1 s, P=0.03; MGYLS: 3.5±0.8 glands to 7.0±1.1 glands, P=0.13) and a normal clinical examination post treatment, MGD patients remained symptomatic. IVCM revealed increased immune cells in the palpebral conjunctiva (refractory MGD EIC=592.6±110.1 cells/mm2 untreated MGD EIC=522.6±104.7 cells/mm2, P=0.69; responsive MGD EIC=194.9±119.4 cells/mm2, P<0.01; normals EIC=123.7±19.2 cells/mm2, P< 0.001), but not the cornea (refractory MGD DC=60.9±28.3 cells/mm2; normals DC=25.9±6.3 cells/mm2; P=0.43). EIC did not correlate with TBUT (Rs=-0.26, P=0.33). OSDI scores correlated with both EIC (Rs=0.76, P<0.001) and TBUT (Rs=-0.69, P<0.01) but not SIC. Intraglandular immune cells were also seen. CONCLUSION: MGD-associated refractory symptoms and the symptom-sign disparity may be explained by clinically non-apparent, active inflammation of the palpebral conjunctiva as detected by IVCM. These patients may benefit from anti-inflammatory therapy.
Authors: Pedram Hamrah; Afsun Sahin; Mohammad H Dastjerdi; Bashar M Shahatit; Hasan A Bayhan; Reza Dana; Deborah Pavan-Langston Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2012-05-16 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Stephen S Lane; Harvey B DuBiner; Randy J Epstein; Paul H Ernest; Jack V Greiner; David R Hardten; Edward J Holland; Michael A Lemp; James E McDonald; David I Silbert; Caroline A Blackie; Christy A Stevens; Raman Bedi Journal: Cornea Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 2.651
Authors: Carlos Belmonte; Jason J Nichols; Stephanie M Cox; James A Brock; Carolyn G Begley; David A Bereiter; Darlene A Dartt; Anat Galor; Pedram Hamrah; Jason J Ivanusic; Deborah S Jacobs; Nancy A McNamara; Mark I Rosenblatt; Fiona Stapleton; James S Wolffsohn Journal: Ocul Surf Date: 2017-07-20 Impact factor: 5.033
Authors: Fen Ye; Feng Jiang; Yan Lu; Chun Yan Xue; Xiao Min Zhu; Yan Wu; Zhen Ping Huang Journal: Indian J Ophthalmol Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 1.848