Literature DB >> 21139171

Beyond the abstract-concrete dichotomy: mode of acquisition, concreteness, imageability, familiarity, age of acquisition, context availability, and abstractness norms for a set of 417 Italian words.

Pasquale A Della Rosa1, Eleonora Catricalà, Gabriella Vigliocco, Stefano F Cappa.   

Abstract

The main objective of this study is to investigate the abstract-concrete dichotomy by introducing a new variable: the mode of acquisition (MoA) of a concept. MoA refers to the way in which concepts are acquired: through experience, through language, or through both. We asked 250 participants to rate 417 words on seven dimensions: age of acquisition, concreteness, familiarity, context availability, imageability, abstractness, and MoA. The data were analyzed by considering MoA ratings and their relationship with the other psycholinguistic variables. Distributions for concreteness, abstractness, and MoA ratings indicate that they are qualitatively different. A partial correlation analysis revealed that MoA is an independent predictor of concreteness or abstractness, and a hierarchical multiple regression analysis confirmed MoA as being a valid predictor of abstractness. Strong correlations with measures for the English translation equivalents in the MRC database confirmed the reliability of our norms. The full database of MoA ratings and other psycholinguistic variables may be downloaded from http://brm.psychonomic-journals.org/content/supplemental or www.abstract-project.eu.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21139171     DOI: 10.3758/BRM.42.4.1042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  40 in total

1.  Understanding of action-related and abstract verbs in comparison: a behavioral and TMS study.

Authors:  Alessandro Innocenti; Elisa De Stefani; Mariateresa Sestito; Maurizio Gentilucci
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2013-10-11

2.  Is justice grounded? How expertise shapes conceptual representation of institutional concepts.

Authors:  Caterina Villani; Stefania D'Ascenzo; Anna M Borghi; Corrado Roversi; Mariagrazia Benassi; Luisa Lugli
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-03-07

3.  A new statistical model for analyzing rating scale data pertaining to word meaning.

Authors:  Felipe Munoz-Rubke; Karen Kafadar; Karin H James
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-04-25

Review 4.  Moving beyond the distinction between concrete and abstract concepts.

Authors:  Lawrence W Barsalou; Léo Dutriaux; Christoph Scheepers
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-08-05       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  How to assess abstract conceptual knowledge: construction, standardization and validation of a new battery of semantic memory tests.

Authors:  Pasquale Anthony Della Rosa; Eleonora Catricalà; Silvia De Battisti; David Vinson; Gabriela Vigliocco; Stefano F Cappa
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2014 Jan-Mar

Review 6.  Evidence of semantic processing impairments in behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia and Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Katheryn A Q Cousins; Murray Grossman
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 5.710

7.  Iconicity ratings for 10,995 Spanish words and their relationship with psycholinguistic variables.

Authors:  J A Hinojosa; J Haro; S Magallares; J A Duñabeitia; P Ferré
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2020-10-09

8.  Semantic similarity and associated abstractness norms for 630 French word pairs.

Authors:  Dounia Lakhzoum; Marie Izaute; Ludovic Ferrand
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2020-10-01

9.  Perceptual Experience Norms for 506 Russian Nouns: Modality Rating, Spatial Localization, Manipulability, Imageability and Other Variables.

Authors:  Alex Miklashevsky
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2018-06

10.  An Italian battery for the assessment of semantic memory disorders.

Authors:  Eleonora Catricalà; Pasquale A Della Rosa; Valeria Ginex; Zoe Mussetti; Valentina Plebani; Stefano F Cappa
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2012-09-09       Impact factor: 3.307

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.